***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

From what I've heard - the opinion around here is that if you've had Covid the first dose hits hard. If you haven't had covid, the second dose hits you.

Just rumors & speculation, just found it interesting if true.

Mine was J&J, so just one dose. Never had COVID. Regardless, hit me like a truck, but I'm perfectly fine today.

[Monticore]

First double lung transplant in Canada on covid patient

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/corona...nada-1.5383468

[PutQuinnIn]

Originally Posted by O.city

Starting to see a lot of stuff that the new variants are a lot rougher on younger people. Hopefully it’s just noise

Oh look at that, just in time for those 16 and older to be eligible for vaccines in CA.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by PutQuinnIn

Oh look at that, just in time for those 16 and older to be eligible for vaccines in CA.

Take the tinfoil off , you need more sun or something.

[Chiefnj2]

The Feds are pausing the J&J vaccine.

[Sure-Oz]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

The Feds are pausing the J&J vaccine.

@kaitlancollins: The CDC and FDA are recommending that the U.S. pause the use of Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine over “six reported U.S. cases of a rare and severe type of blood clot," per a release. More than 6.8 million doses of the J&J vaccine have been administered in the U.S.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

6 out of 7 million...

[AussieChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother

6 out of 7 million...

Statistically, I feel like it's more dangerous to go to the toilet or something.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan

Statistically, I feel like it's more dangerous to go to the toilet or something.

You're actually more statistically likely to just randomly get a blood clot or DVT WITHOUT a vaccine

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by loochy

You're actually more statistically likely to just randomly get a blood clot or DVT WITHOUT a vaccine

Exactly

[AussieChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by loochy

You're actually more statistically likely to just randomly get a blood clot or DVT WITHOUT a vaccine

Right? Like is this just to appease anti-vaxxers or something. Usually governments don't seem to care about them so what gives.

[Rainbarrel]

The loss of work time after getting the shot(s). Has got to be pissing management off. An inconvenience at the least.

[ChiliConCarnage]

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan

Right? Like is this just to appease anti-vaxxers or something. Usually governments don't seem to care about them so what gives.

There are plenty of non anti-vaxxers at least somewhat hesitant. It doesn't hurt much to take a look. We pulled certification for their US manufacturing plant to make anymore already so shipments were going to drop 86% this week compared to last week.

Johnson & Johnson said it would take them a few weeks to get recertified (hopefully).

[AussieChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by ChiliConCarnage

There are plenty of non anti-vaxxers at least somewhat hesitant. It doesn't hurt much to take a look.

It's not mandatory to get the vaccine at the moment though is it?

Johnson & Johnson said it would take them a few weeks to get recertified (hopefully). We pulled certification for their US manufacturing plant to make anymore already so shipments were going to drop 86% this week compared to last week.

So does that mean that they got decertified just because of the 6 out of 7 million thing?

Probably an ignorant question but I haven't been paying too much attention to vaccines as of late since we (regular folk) probably won't be getting them down under until bloody next year.

[R Clark]

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan

It's not mandatory to get the vaccine at the moment though is it?
So does that mean that they got decertified just because of the 6 out of 7 million thing?

Probably an ignorant question but I haven't been paying too much attention to vaccines as of late since we (regular folk) probably won't be getting them down under until bloody next year.

What are cases per day looking like down under?