Stallworth released

[Garcia Bronco]

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

He was drunk, not high, and even if he wasn't the man would have gotten hit anyway. Thats why he got such a light sentence. The man was walking where he shouldn't have been.

The found THC in his system. Now whether he was under the influence of THC at the time is impossible to say. But it was in his system.

Either way the dirt bag flashed his lights at a guy and proceeded to run him down.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

The found THC in his system. Now whether he was under the influence of THC at the time is impossible to say. But it was in his system.

Either way the dirt bag flashed his lights at a guy and proceeded to run him down.

What don't you understand about that even a sober person would have ran him over?
Posted via Mobile Device

[banyon]

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

What don't you understand about that even a sober person would have ran him over?
Posted via Mobile Device

How was that established?

I think it was just that prosecutors couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Stallworth's drunk driving was the main cause of the accident. That is different than saying they know it did not cause the accident.

Courts rarely get to prove someone innocent, usually just that it's not certain enough.

[Mr. Flopnuts]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

The found THC in his system. Now whether he was under the influence of THC at the time is impossible to say. But it was in his system.

Either way the dirt bag flashed his lights at a guy and proceeded to run him down.

Dude. Pot is not going to make you hit someone. Driving too fast will, but not pot.

Being stoned is NOWHERE near the same as being drunk. It's not even close.

I'm not advocating that people should drive around high, I'm just sayin'.

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Dude. Pot is not going to make you hit someone. Driving too fast will, but not pot.

Being stoned is NOWHERE near the same as being drunk. It's not even close.

I'm not advocating that people should drive around high, I'm just sayin'.

for me it is ... pot makes me dizzy just like being drunk


smoking even a little bit after drinking will just send me flying

[Tango&Cash]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

The found THC in his system. Now whether he was under the influence of THC at the time is impossible to say. But it was in his system.

Either way the dirt bag flashed his lights at a guy and proceeded to run him down.

You know what the half life is of THC and how long it can stay in your "system"?

I'm completely sober right now, I could get in my car right now, run over and kill someone, they could draw blood from me and I'd have THC in my system. I havent smoked pot in 4-5 days.


And responding to Flopnuts post. Driving drunk is A LOT different than driving drunk, that is unless you get so high you want to pass out.

[BWillie]

Bring him in. He's gonna be cheap.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by BWillie007

Bring him in. He's gonna be cheap.

Contract value isn't an issue in an uncapped year

[doomy3]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Contract value isn't an issue in an uncapped year

No, but Stallworth wouldn't be worth anything more than a cheap deal, even if money isn't an obstacle. He has been out of football for a year, and was completely ineffective the year before all that happened.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by doomy3

No, but Stallworth wouldn't be worth anything more than a cheap deal, even if money isn't an obstacle. He has been out of football for a year, and was completely ineffective the year before all that happened.

As I stated earlier, sign him to an incentive laden contract. He averages 42 catches a season and would definitely be an upgrade over the current wide receiving personnel.

[RippedmyFlesh]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Contract value isn't an issue in an uncapped year

True
But where would you roughly rank KC as far as willingness/means to spend in an uncapped enviroment? I don't know enough about big $$$ to know who's a heavy hitter and who is a light weight. Is the dallas kc gap as big as the yankees and royals gap as far as spending capabilities are concerned?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by RippedmyFlesh

True
But where would you roughly rank KC as far as willingness/means to spend in an uncapped enviroment? I don't know enough about big $$$ to know who's a heavy hitter and who is a light weight. Is the dallas kc gap as big as the yankees and royals gap as far as spending capabilities are concerned?

A-gain, sign him to an incentive laden contract.

I don't think it'll take much to get him in KC and Pioli does have a history with the "player".

[RippedmyFlesh]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

A-gain, sign him to an incentive laden contract.

I don't think it'll take much to get him in KC and Pioli does have a history with the "player".

I agree sign him asap.
He would be a bargain when he first comes back.
The thought of no salary cap beyond next year is what troubles me.
The cap prevented jones .snyder and god forbid davis from spending 3X as much as jax. With a cap you have to watch your spending so you paid for mistakes with no cap bad owners could just spend their way out of their mistakes.

[Mr. Flopnuts]

I doubt anyone is coming to KC unless either A. they have too, or B. we pay them better than anyone else.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

I doubt anyone is coming to KC unless either A. they have too, or B. we pay them better than anyone else.

Spoiler