|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does our arrival in the Mahomes era affect your interest in Chiefs history? | |||
| I’m less interested in the Chiefs’ history, because the future is forward. |
   
|
25 | 35.71% |
| I’m more interested in the Chiefs’ history, because it makes me appreciate where we’re at more. |
  
|
22 | 31.43% |
| The Mahomes era is not impacting my interest in Chiefs history, because I compartmentalize my emotions. |
  
|
16 | 22.86% |
| I don’t really follow the Chiefs. I’m just here for the ice cream and off-topic discussions. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| I still think we should change the team name to Ermines. |
  
|
2 | 2.86% |
| Per the Fifth Amendment, I am not required to share this information with you. |
  
|
5 | 7.14% |
| Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-03-2018, 05:36 PM
|
Topic Starter |
|
Seize life. Be an ermine.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $-762449
 VARSITY
|
Is anyone else now uninterested in the Chiefs' past?
As I bask in the sunshine of the Mahomes era, I find myself far less interested in the past. I don't care about past playoff losses, I don't fret about past quarterbacks, and Herman Edwards can talk about whatever he wants. The current Chiefs have no relation to the past, and I find myself living in the present and looking forward to the future. I like this new life of mine.
I realize now that nearly every playoff game in my memory has been mid-level teams squabbling for table scraps. We lost to the Colts? Who cares? Neither team was going anywhere anyway. I have released my anger. Matt Cassel? Who cares? It's the past. He's gone. We have a franchise quarterback. Does anyone else feel the same way? |
|
Posts: 145,597
  |
|
|
|
Is anyone else now uninterested in the Chiefs' past?
Threaded Mode