Official Draft Travone Boykin Thread

[KC native]

Look up highlights on your own.

Draft him, Dorsey.

[duncan_idaho]

Bleeeeccccccccch.

Draft a QB. But Boykin? No thanks.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho

Bleeeeccccccccch.

Draft a QB. But Boykin? No thanks.

U R Dumb.

Boykin makes reads, has great arm strength, and can run (only runs when he needs to as well).

Boykin is legit.

[duncan_idaho]

Originally Posted by KC native

U R Dumb.

Boykin makes reads, has great arm strength, and can run (only runs when he needs to as well).

Boykin is legit.

And is...

Undersized
A spread-offense product
Struggled mightily with making the limited reads required for a college offense as a younger player

UR R A HOMER

He's a poverty version of RGIII, who did everything better than Boykin at the college level.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho

And is...

Undersized
A spread-offense product
Struggled mightily with making the limited reads required for a spread offense as a younger player

UR R A HOMER

He's a poverty version of RGIII, who did everything better than Boykin at the college level.

What the **** are you talking about?

He sucked when we ran a more traditional offense. He only became a QB because Paschall ****ed up. He was a RB/WR prior to that (and by prior to that, I mean during the offseason that year).

When we went to the spread offense, he flourished. He ran a similar offense in high school. He has increased the amount of reads that he makes from when we went to the spread offense.

He's a better prospect than RG3 because he can actually take a hit.

[duncan_idaho]

Originally Posted by KC native

What the **** are you talking about?

He sucked when we ran a more traditional offense. He only became a QB because Paschall ****ed up. He was a RB/WR prior to that (and by prior to that, I mean during the offseason that year).

When we went to the spread offense, he flourished. He ran a similar offense in high school. He has increased the amount of reads that he makes from when we went to the spread offense.

He's a better prospect than RG3 because he can actually take a hit.

I wrote "spread" instead of "college."

I was trying to say that he looks like a spread product. He struggled with reads and accuracy before TCU went to the spread.

Even making "reads" in a spread offense is very different from making them in an NFL offense. Sorry, but dual-threat spread guys are just not reliable things to hitch NFL hopes to.

He is not a better prospect than RGIII at this point. Griffin was bigger, has a stronger arm, and was more dynamic as a run threat at QB.

[Rudy tossed tigger's salad]

Originally Posted by KC native

What the **** are you talking about?

He sucked when we ran a more traditional offense. He only became a QB because Paschall ****ed up. He was a RB/WR prior to that (and by prior to that, I mean during the offseason that year).

When we went to the spread offense, he flourished. He ran a similar offense in high school. He has increased the amount of reads that he makes from when we went to the spread offense.

He's a better prospect than RG3 because he can actually take a hit.

Lol. This reads like a negative scouting report

[Prison Bitch]

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho

And is...

Undersized
A spread-offense product
Struggled mightily with making the limited reads required for a college offense as a younger player

UR R A HOMER

He's a poverty version of RGIII, who did everything better than Boykin at the college level.

All this. But recall this next time you're eager to defend Aaron Crow or the litany of MU garbage that's played for the Chiefs lately, like when you wanted to start Daniel.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

All this. But recall this next time you're eager to defend Aaron Crow or the litany of MU garbage that's played for the Chiefs lately, like when you wanted to start Daniel.

You expect anyone to believe that you've ever watched TCU play?

You don't watch the Royals games, yet still try to have an opinion on them. I wouldn't be surprised if you don't even watch Chiefs games.

[duncan_idaho]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

All this. But recall this next time you're eager to defend Aaron Crow or the litany of MU garbage that's played for the Chiefs lately, like when you wanted to start Daniel.

I would prefer to start Chase Daniel at QB over Alex Smith because, while he does have physical limitations, he's less of a ****ing coward when it comes to throwing the ball. He can make any throw Alex Smith will actually attempt, and he will get the ball out quickly and decisively.

I don't want him long-term as the answer and have no delusions about him (he's not Drew Brees). Not have I ever said he is... just that he can provide 90 percent of what Alex Smith does, bar minimum, at a much lower price.

I didn't defend Aaron Crow because he went to Mizzou. I simply have pointed out that he is less of a bust at this point than many guys in his class, and I consider him less of a bust compared to Chris Colon.

[Prison Bitch]

You misspelled his name.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

You misspelled his name.

no1curr.

[Prison Bitch]

You don't even know the name of your schools best player. Damn, you're stupid.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

You don't even know the name of your schools best player. Damn, you're stupid.

I care about how he plays. I don't give a **** about how he spells his name.

Not surprising that a ku fan cares more about spelling someone's name than what that player actually does.

[Bowser]

I do not ever want to see a highly touted college spread option QB on my pro team, ever. Boykin is great at TCU and will garner Heisman consideration, but he will fail in the NFL if he stays at QB just likely nearly every other spread option QB has (Mariota looks like he might have a future, as well as Tannehill, but that's it).

Give me a quarterback from a pro set offense.