Chiefs Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour - Page 3

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradyFTW!

That would absolutely slay all of these Oakland fans who have already worked themselves into a frenzy over how they got a bargain by getting him for a first :P

Oh my God, it would be worth it just to see all the shellshocked faces wearing masks and makeup, LOL.

Titty Meat · 09-07-2009, 02:02 PM

Why would the Chiefs trade a 2nd for a D-end when they already got 2 D-ends that were first round picks?

DBOSHO · 09-07-2009, 02:03 PM

idk if id give up a 2 for him

MMXcalibur · 09-07-2009, 02:03 PM

Oakland has to give up their #1 in 2011 for Seymour but we dish out one of our #2's? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be faaaaaaaaaaaantastic

**OnTheWarpath15** · 09-07-2009, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corandval

That would be great!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84

man... can you imagine?

This offseason has already been the best ever... but dear god...

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCtotheSB

Oakland has to give up their #1 in 2011 for Seymour but we dish out one of our #2's? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be faaaaaaaaaaaantastic

I'd love to know what is great about spending the 3rd overall pick, the 5th overall pick, a 2nd round pick and a high 3rd round pick on the same goddamn position, which isn't even that ****ing important in a 3-4 defense?

acesn8s · 09-07-2009, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I'd love to know what is great about spending the 3rd overall pick, the 5th overall pick, a 2nd round pick and a high 3rd round pick on the same goddamn position, which isn't even that ****ing important in a 3-4 defense?

BPA!!!

acesn8s · 09-07-2009, 02:04 PM

When did Seymour start playing on the o-line?

**RealSNR** · 09-07-2009, 02:05 PM

Why? He wouldn't play NT. That's what we need is a nose.

Besides, as mediocre as Tank is, we should give him a season at his new position. After we go 1-15, THEN we'll figure stuff out.

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay

Why would the Chiefs trade a 2nd for a D-end when they already got 2 D-ends that were first round picks?

Quote:

Originally Posted by acesn8s

When did Seymour start playing on the o-line?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Why? He wouldn't play NT. That's what we need is a nose.

Besides, as mediocre as Tank is, we should give him a season at his new position. After we go 1-15, THEN we'll figure stuff out.

Well done, all!

I swear, if some of you got a reach-around from Megan Fox, you'd complain that she didn't lick your bunghole at the same time.

**The Bad Guy** · 09-07-2009, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367

Well done, all!

I swear, if some of you got a reach-around from Megan Fox, you'd complain that she didn't lick your bunghole at the same time.

Billay would rather get his hole licked by Michael J. Fox instead of Megan.

acesn8s · 09-07-2009, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367

Well done, all!

I swear, if some of you got a reach-around from Megan Fox, you'd complain that she didn't lick your bunghole at the same time.

Why the **** is she behind me!

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acesn8s

Why the **** is she behind me!

Damn... that's actually a good point. I stand corrected!

EyePod · 09-07-2009, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Why? He wouldn't play NT. That's what we need is a nose.

Besides, as mediocre as Tank is, we should give him a season at his new position. After we go 1-15, THEN we'll figure stuff out.

Tank looked a lot better last game....

**The Bad Guy** · 09-07-2009, 02:07 PM

This would mean Dorsey would never see the field. I don't know how I'd feel about it. Seymour and Jackson as DE's would be nice. Dorsey would have to gain 30 pounds and just clog the middle.

keg in kc · 09-07-2009, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

This would mean Dorsey would never see the field. I don't know how I'd feel about it. Seymour and Jackson as DE's would be nice. Dorsey would have to gain 30 pounds and just clog the middle.

Maybe Dorsey's about to be traded.

09-07-2009, 02:03 PM	#3
DBOSHO trap champ Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	idk if id give up a 2 for him __________________ Orginator of the group repost
Posts: 5,445

09-07-2009, 02:03 PM	#4
MMXcalibur Pessimistically optimistic. Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Denver, CO Casino cash: $-144914	Oakland has to give up their #1 in 2011 for Seymour but we dish out one of our #2's? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be faaaaaaaaaaaantastic
Posts: 16,747

09-07-2009, 02:04 PM	#7
acesn8s MVP Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Here Casino cash: $10007119	When did Seymour start playing on the o-line? __________________ Let's not take another 50 years.
Posts: 5,711

09-07-2009, 02:05 PM	#8
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $-1314792	Why? He wouldn't play NT. That's what we need is a nose. Besides, as mediocre as Tank is, we should give him a season at his new position. After we go 1-15, THEN we'll figure stuff out.
Posts: 93,279

09-07-2009, 02:07 PM	#14
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9283645	This would mean Dorsey would never see the field. I don't know how I'd feel about it. Seymour and Jackson as DE's would be nice. Dorsey would have to gain 30 pounds and just clog the middle. __________________
Posts: 23,216

09-07-2009, 02:02 PM	#2
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $-992442	Why would the Chiefs trade a 2nd for a D-end when they already got 2 D-ends that were first round picks?
Posts: 78,087

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode