Chiefs Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 01:57 PM

Found this on Patsfans.com, don't know where it came from, but it would be f**king hilarious...

http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-...done-deal.html

Post #5:

They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.

corandval · 09-07-2009, 01:59 PM

That would be great!

Dante84 · 09-07-2009, 02:00 PM

man... can you imagine?

This offseason has already been the best ever... but dear god...

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:02 PM

Hey, why not.

Belichick likes Pioli.

The Chiefs have cap space.

The Chiefs could use Seymour.

Seymour would probably rather play in KC, for Pioli, with Vrabel and Cassel, where he has a better chance to win.

Seymour would probably work out a new contract to stay in KC, as opposed to wanting to run screaming from Oakland at the first opportunity.

Last but not least, it would allow Patriots fans to root for Seymour, since almost no one hates the Chiefs but almost everyone hates the Raiders.

BradyFTW! · 09-07-2009, 02:02 PM

That would absolutely slay all of these Oakland fans who have already worked themselves into a frenzy over how they got a bargain by getting him for a first :P

Hell, even if the Chiefs don't trade for Seymour, I bet they sign him as a FA in 2010.

Titty Meat · 09-07-2009, 02:02 PM

Why would the Chiefs trade a 2nd for a D-end when they already got 2 D-ends that were first round picks?

**OnTheWarpath15** · 09-07-2009, 02:02 PM

What am I missing here?

Is the Seymour trade not final?

And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradyFTW!

That would absolutely slay all of these Oakland fans who have already worked themselves into a frenzy over how they got a bargain by getting him for a first :P

Oh my God, it would be worth it just to see all the shellshocked faces wearing masks and makeup, LOL.

DBOSHO · 09-07-2009, 02:03 PM

idk if id give up a 2 for him

MMXcalibur · 09-07-2009, 02:03 PM

Oakland has to give up their #1 in 2011 for Seymour but we dish out one of our #2's? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be faaaaaaaaaaaantastic

acesn8s · 09-07-2009, 02:04 PM

When did Seymour start playing on the o-line?

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

What am I missing here?

Is the Seymour trade not final?

And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?

Why am I not surprised by this post? Some of you, man, you're unbelievable. Mention a rumor that the Chiefs might get Seymour for a 2nd-rounder, which would be a pretty good deal for them, and not five minutes later it's already labeled as a stupid move. I swear, if Pioli traded for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, someone here would complain that the #3 QB sucks ass, LOL...

**RealSNR** · 09-07-2009, 02:05 PM

Why? He wouldn't play NT. That's what we need is a nose.

Besides, as mediocre as Tank is, we should give him a season at his new position. After we go 1-15, THEN we'll figure stuff out.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 09-07-2009, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corandval

That would be great!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84

man... can you imagine?

This offseason has already been the best ever... but dear god...

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCtotheSB

Oakland has to give up their #1 in 2011 for Seymour but we dish out one of our #2's? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be faaaaaaaaaaaantastic

I'd love to know what is great about spending the 3rd overall pick, the 5th overall pick, a 2nd round pick and a high 3rd round pick on the same goddamn position, which isn't even that ****ing important in a 3-4 defense?

**RealSNR** · 09-07-2009, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367

Why am I not surprised by this post? Some of you, man, you're unbelievable. Mention a rumor that the Chiefs might get Seymour for a 2nd-rounder, which would be a pretty good deal for them, and not five minutes later it's already labeled as a stupid move. I swear, if Pioli traded for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, someone here would complain that the #3 QB sucks ass, LOL...

Tyson Jackson- #3 overall
Glenn Dorsey- #5 overall

Are we spending a 2nd rounder on a backup or what? That would be stupid, especially a 30+ year old backup.

09-07-2009, 01:57 PM
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour Found this on Patsfans.com, don't know where it came from, but it would be f**king hilarious... http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-...done-deal.html Post #5: They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.
Posts: 12,916

09-07-2009, 02:02 PM	#4
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	Hey, why not. Belichick likes Pioli. The Chiefs have cap space. The Chiefs could use Seymour. Seymour would probably rather play in KC, for Pioli, with Vrabel and Cassel, where he has a better chance to win. Seymour would probably work out a new contract to stay in KC, as opposed to wanting to run screaming from Oakland at the first opportunity. Last but not least, it would allow Patriots fans to root for Seymour, since almost no one hates the Chiefs but almost everyone hates the Raiders.
Posts: 12,916

09-07-2009, 02:02 PM	#6
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $-982442	Why would the Chiefs trade a 2nd for a D-end when they already got 2 D-ends that were first round picks?
Posts: 78,086

09-07-2009, 02:02 PM	#7
OnTheWarpath15 MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Casino cash: $2231115	What am I missing here? Is the Seymour trade not final? And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?
Posts: 60,746

09-07-2009, 02:03 PM	#9
DBOSHO trap champ Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	idk if id give up a 2 for him __________________ Orginator of the group repost
Posts: 5,445

09-07-2009, 01:59 PM	#2
corandval Chief fan 4 life! Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Hastings, Minnesota Casino cash: $10004900	That would be great!
Posts: 130

09-07-2009, 02:00 PM	#3
Dante84 Tossed Salad & Scrambled Eggs Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: ATX & OPKS Casino cash: $-1838004 VARSITY	man... can you imagine? This offseason has already been the best ever... but dear god...
Posts: 20,446

09-07-2009, 02:02 PM	#5
BradyFTW! Starter Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	That would absolutely slay all of these Oakland fans who have already worked themselves into a frenzy over how they got a bargain by getting him for a first :P Hell, even if the Chiefs don't trade for Seymour, I bet they sign him as a FA in 2010.
Posts: 124

09-07-2009, 02:03 PM	#10
MMXcalibur Pessimistically optimistic. Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Denver, CO Casino cash: $-144914	Oakland has to give up their #1 in 2011 for Seymour but we dish out one of our #2's? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be faaaaaaaaaaaantastic
Posts: 16,747

09-07-2009, 02:04 PM	#11
acesn8s MVP Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Here Casino cash: $10007119	When did Seymour start playing on the o-line? __________________ Let's not take another 50 years.
Posts: 5,711

09-07-2009, 02:05 PM	#13
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $-1304792	Why? He wouldn't play NT. That's what we need is a nose. Besides, as mediocre as Tank is, we should give him a season at his new position. After we go 1-15, THEN we'll figure stuff out.
Posts: 93,278