Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck.

[Hammock Parties]

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Stafford is 8-14

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho

It's usually on the one who questions the stat to disprove it, but I'll help you out. I won't even look at elite guys. I'll just pick some guys whom many have disputed are better than Alex Smith:

Tony Romo is 7-15 over the past three years. Better.

Philip Rivers is 5-19. Better.

Joe Flacco is 6-8. Better.

Matt Ryan is 5-10. Better (and before this disaster of a season, was 3-2).

Matt Schaub is 5-9. Better.

If Alex had this many chances he might be better then them. Why would you look up elite QB's? No one here is calling Alex Elite

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

If Alex had this many chances he might be better then them.

[jd1020]

I'd like to thank Huard, Thigpen, Croyle, Palko, Cassel, and Quinn for this broken ass fanbase that wants to believe someone marginally better can win it all.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I'm not yet sold he can pull this kind of performance off against a defense that isn't as terrible as San Diego's and isn't as beat up as Denver's.

If Alex Smith is truly on the upswing, the Redskins are in for rape.

There should be 0 reason he doesn't ball the **** out Sunday.

[Pablo]

better then them

better then them

better then them

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace

Incorrect. It was actually Kerry Collins

really? Collins was signed on AUG 24. let that sink in.


and reggie wayne and other teammates were pissed because he didn't know the plays. they wanted painter to start.

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

really? Collins was signed on AUG 24. let that sink in.


and reggie wayne and other teammates were pissed because he didn't know the plays. they wanted painter to start.

Don't waste your time with that guy.

jd took care of him earlier.

[Sandy Vagina]

Originally Posted by jd1020

I'd like to thank Huard, Thigpen, Croyle, Palko, Cassel, and Quinn for turning we the fans into gaping vaginas that can do nothing but spread our doom and gloom menstruation here.

FYP

[duncan_idaho]

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

If Alex had this many chances he might be better then them.

All right, then. Let's adjust for chances.

In 22 chances, at his current rate, Alex Smith would have 4.88 wins. Round it up to 5, and that's still 2 games worse than Romo.

He'd have 3.11 in 14 chances, nearly 3 games worse than Flacco and nearly 2 games worse than Matt Schaub.

He'd have 3.33 wins in 15 chances, nearly 2 games worse than Ryan.

Rivers is the only one he beats when adjusting for opportunities.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by jd1020

I'd like to thank Huard, Thigpen, Croyle, Palko, Cassel, and Quinn for this broken ass fanbase that wants to believe someone marginally better can win it all.

Thigpen had this fanbase all aflutter in 2008.

If we ever draft a first rounder and he's even decent, like Flacco or Ryan, they are going to be so ****ing in love.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho

All right, then. Let's adjust for chances.

In 22 chances, at his current rate, Alex Smith would have 4.88 wins. Round it up to 5, and that's still 2 games worse than Romo.

He'd have 3.11 in 14 chances, nearly 3 games worse than Flacco and nearly 2 games worse than Matt Schaub.

He'd have 3.33 wins in 15 chances, nearly 2 games worse than Ryan.

Rivers is the only one he beats when adjusting for opportunities.

We know that throwing the ball more has certainly helped Alex's completion percentage and yards per attempt.

I am sure throwing more against teams who are scoring more will be awesome for him!

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead

If Alex Smith is truly on the upswing, the Redskins are in for rape.

There should be 0 reason he doesn't ball the **** out Sunday.

The 2 juggernauts going at it. The 20 point scoring offense vs the 30 points given a game defense.

Classic scenario of the Unstoppable Force vs the Immovable Object.

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead

So you basically want to compare the only good period of Alex's career against Ben's lean years.

That's bullshit, son.

At the very least you need to compare Alex's good seasons against Ben's entire career.

But even that is questionable.

Waaaaaaa Alex played on bad teams. Waaaaaaaa.

That still doesn't excuse ZERO wins in that situation.

I guess Ben needs a elite D to win. Last 3 years Steelers D not the same and he's 1-9 when other teams score 24.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

I guess Ben needs a elite D to win. Last 3 years Steelers D not the same and he's 1-9 when other teams score 24.

Take away the 2 SB rings and he's Alex Smith LOLOLO!L!LOL!OL!