Paging Exoter - Page 3

Direckshun · 10-19-2014, 12:33 PM

Exoter believes the Chiefs will either let Houston walk, sign him longterm, or will tender him at the 1st & 3rd round draft pick tender.

I do not believe this. I think there's no way the Chiefs let Houston walk or sign him longterm this offseason. He's too valuable and maddingly difficult to sign.

I am betting the Chiefs have to franchise tag him. Let's bet on it, since you were comfortable doing so in another thread.

If Houston is on the tag (either playing or holding out) by Week 1 in 2015, I get to determine your username, avatar, and signature until Week 16. I'll let you back to normalcy by Week 17 and any playoff run the Chiefs might have.

If Houston is not on the tag, you can name your terms.

Direckshun · 11-01-2014, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

Which is public information, yet somehow running around calling me a fraud and tossing out insults and namecalling in every.....single......post.....is ok?

Alright, sound logic there.

It actually is okay.

It's not against the rules. Posting personal information is.

Sorter · 11-01-2014, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

It actually is okay.

It's not against the rules. Posting personal information is.

YOU KNOW NOTHING!!!!!

/Exoter

Sorter · 11-01-2014, 09:19 PM

Additionally sweet Exoter, nearly everyone's called you a fraud. You probably shouldn't get so worked up over it.

Direckshun · 11-02-2014, 05:29 AM

Testing.

**SAUTO** · 11-02-2014, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

How does this guy not get a ban, and I do? Honestly.

Prove to me that I've ever been fraudulent, otherwise shut up with your ignorance already. Your level of comprehension leaves a serious case for misinterpretation at every post in this entire forum. Do yourself the favor and go ACTUALLY READ what I was talking about, instead of assuming to "know".

Furthermore, get THE **** out of this thread. We do not need to sidetrack YET ANOTHER thread because of you.

.

Rasing hours and telling customers that's what it actually calls for is fraud. And I don't know what you want me to read. The map program? The one that never steps foot in the door? You pay them and they back you.

Really proves something there...

Exoter175 · 11-02-2014, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

It actually is okay.

It's not against the rules. Posting personal information is.

So you're telling me that I can call him a cumguzzling gutterslut who is both a reerun, a fraud, and a poser, and get in zero trouble? Saweeeeeeet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter

YOU KNOW NOTHING!!!!!

/Exoter

Calm your tits fatty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter

Additionally sweet Exoter, nearly everyone's called you a fraud. You probably shouldn't get so worked up over it.

I think there's been three whole people who called me a fraud on this website, Sauto, some random and you or someone else from a year or so ago, meanwhile I got several PM's from members asking me about the situation, and asking me on advice as well, from the post. So that's a little less than "nearly everyone" lol.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

.

Rasing hours and telling customers that's what it actually calls for is fraud. And I don't know what you want me to read. The map program? The one that never steps foot in the door? You pay them and they back you.

Really proves something there...

You still lack comprehension and fail to understand context. I was explaining how the system is applied at the dealership/large scale shop level, and you just assumed that (and you claimed this word for word) that I could just adjust the hours as I see fit when some little old lady came in so I could fleece her, which I could not, nor would I. But hey, you ignored the facts and just believed what you would, because you're a sheep in this life, no wonder you're worried about getting fleeced.

Say what you will about MAP, Sauto, but its a lot like getting a high school diploma, of which I doubt you have, or a degree from an accredited college institute, of which I know you don't have. Its about "paid dues" not in the sense of false security paying them for them to give you a sign on your door saying "hey you can trust me" but more of a "coming of age" situation, meaning "I'm either big enough, serious enough, or reputable enough to have this sign on my door". I wouldn't hold it against you with your shadetree mechanics operation, with your unpaved parking and 8 dollar an hour mechanics to to knock such a "place" but believe it or not, its a lot more than just a sticker. in B2B situations, a lot of times its something that a shop MUST have to qualify.

You'd know nothing about B2B situations, as I doubt heavily that you've ever taken on a major client for their fleets before, as you live in the sticks with a very small customer footprint.

I can see why you say that you have plenty of work, too, considering you have such a small shop and so few employees, and yet you talk down on me like you've ever managed 40+ employees in a dealership setting.

Get out of here kid.

Sorter · 11-02-2014, 08:41 PM

Sully called you a fraud.

I think you have an exceptionally high football IQ. You demonstrated this in the Bob Sutton thread.

Exoter175 · 11-02-2014, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter

Sully called you a fraud.

I think you have an exceptionally high football IQ. You demonstrated this in the Bob Sutton thread.

The fact that you know who it was, when that shit was like 6 months to a year or more ago, is testament to the fact that you need to get off the computer or eat fewer Twinkies and enjoy the sunlight, what little we have left of it.

Sorter · 11-02-2014, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

The fact that you know who it was, when that shit was like 6 months to a year or more ago, is testament to the fact that you need to get off the computer or eat fewer Twinkies and enjoy the sunlight, what little we have left of it.

Sully called you a fraud in the Bob Sutton thread.

I have no idea who called you one prior to that. I also don't eat Twinkies. Since you gave me such an excellent recommendation though, I'd encourage you to learn about fronts and coverages, since it seems you really struggle with that. Surprising, given your "very, very high football IQ".

Exoter175 · 11-02-2014, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter

Sully called you a fraud in the Bob Sutton thread.

I have no idea who called you one prior to that. I also don't eat Twinkies. Since you gave me such an excellent recommendation though, I'd encourage you to learn about fronts and coverages, since it seems you really struggle with that. Surprising, given your "very, very high football IQ".

Considering you failed to discern the alignment I called in my hypothetically named play call, I think you've got a lot more to learn about the game, to be calling someone who actually played it for half is life, out on his own knowledge.

But that's cool, keep trolling fatty.

Sorter · 11-02-2014, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

Considering you failed to discern the alignment I called in my hypothetically named play call, I think you've got a lot more to learn about the game, to be calling someone who actually played it for half is life, out on his own knowledge.

But that's cool, keep trolling fatty.

.

You didn't list an alignment. You didn't list what techniques the DL was playing. You didn't state whether the front was aligned to passing or run strength. There was nothing to discern. Basically, you're a ****ing mongoloid with a "football IQ" that is the worst I've witnessed on this board.

You didn't post anything that even remotely resembled a description of a front or a coverage. It was the most bizarre, nonsensical rambling that didn't resemble anything remotely related to adequately describing football. The fact that another person who's a pretty respected coach on here shared the exact same sentiments I did regarding your terrible post speaks much more than your "I played football, I am smart" comments do.

I even provided you examples of how that would look. Would you like me to bump it for you so that you can see what an actual front looks like and is described?

Exoter175 · 11-02-2014, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter

.

You didn't list an alignment. You didn't list what techniques the DL was playing. You didn't state whether the front was aligned to passing or run strength. There was nothing to discern. Basically, you're a ****ing mongoloid with a "football IQ" that is the worst I've witnessed on this board.

You didn't post anything that even remotely resembled a description of a front or a coverage. It was the most bizarre, nonsensical rambling that didn't resemble anything remotely related to adequately describing football. The fact that another person who's a pretty respected coach on here shared the exact same sentiments I did regarding your terrible post speaks much more than your "I played football, I am smart" comments do.

I even provided you examples of how that would look. Would you like me to bump it for you so that you can see what an actual front looks like and is described?

Bump it all you want, I'm not posting in a thread where 50% of the posts are from Sauto on my ignore list and you trolling.

As for my nonsensical rambling for you, bearcat 52 mike is a hybrid defensive front/alignment spawning from the original "bear" front, in case you had no ****ing clue because you probably never actually played football. The play calls for a Middle Linebacker blitz with a single high safety. Its a very, very basic play ran from Pop Warner through some Junior Colleges, and you rarely see it in Division 1 football, but hey, what do I know, right?

Sorter, I get that you "have" to be right, and for some reason don't believe I'm right about Sutton and how he's been doing things, and somehow that insults you because you have that attitude and personality of "always being right", that's cool, but as a player who has played for ****ing god knows how long in football, and been a lifelong fan who has likely played about a few hundred thousand snaps more than you have, perhaps you just need to take what I said with a grain of salt and understand that everyone is entitled to their opinions.

Believe it or not, whether you are captain of the Armchairs on CP or not, there's going to be opposition to ideas and idioms on this forum, and there's always going to be someone with more experience, more information, or more intelligence opposing or agreeing with you, so get over it.

Its clear that you are a basic forum troll, living in your mothers basement, stuffed full of Twinkies, so I'll grant you that, but don't hassle me nonsensical drama when every argument you make is going to boil down to semantics, I require more substance than that.

Now run along before you join Sauto on the Ignore list

Sorter · 11-02-2014, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

Bump it all you want, I'm not posting in a thread where 50% of the posts are from Sauto on my ignore list and you trolling.

Tapout acknowledged.

Quote:

As for my nonsensical rambling for you, bearcat 52 mike is a hybrid defensive front/alignment spawning from the original "bear" front, in case you had no ****ing clue because you probably never actually played football. The play calls for a Middle Linebacker blitz with a single high safety. Its a very, very basic play ran from Pop Warner through some Junior Colleges, and you rarely see it in Division 1 football, but hey, what do I know, right?

Okay, that's great. That isn't what you called the front in your lengthy and horrific breakdown. You listed that as an example of a different play.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

Right now, its as if this Defense's ability for adjustment is about 50% installed. Sutton's calling these things into Mauga and saying, "Hey, I'm sending in your guys, the call is Bearcat 52 Mike, if they shift the TE, adjust your coverage to X or Y, if they motion the slot, have the strong side drop into zone and you give support to Sean", shit like that is being said.

Are you now stating that the Chiefs were playing your hybrid bear during the 49ers game? It's a pretty recognizable front and personnel grouping, so I shouldn't have any problem taking screen shots of it for you in A22.

Quote:

Sorter, I get that you "have" to be right, and for some reason don't believe I'm right about Sutton and how he's been doing things, and somehow that insults you because you have that attitude and personality of "always being right", that's cool, but as a player who has played for ****ing god knows how long in football, and been a lifelong fan who has likely played about a few hundred thousand snaps more than you have, perhaps you just need to take what I said with a grain of salt and understand that everyone is entitled to their opinions.

It's really irritating to have mongos come on here, post things that aren't even close to being accurate, then get extremely defensive when they're corrected. The fact you tried to boast about your supposed "High Football IQ" makes it enjoyable to me to provide corrections. Your opinions are absolutely ****ing worthless. You have posted nothing that makes any sense to the people on this board that do have a slight understanding of football. One of us made posts that the Chiefs were using a popwarner/JC play. The other recently broke down a game and provided the actual playcalls, fronts, and techniques used by the Jets from their own playbook. Sorry if I don't immediately bow to your superior football intellect.

Quote:

Believe it or not, whether you are captain of the Armchairs on CP or not, there's going to be opposition to ideas and idioms on this forum, and there's always going to be someone with more experience, more information, or more intelligence opposing or agreeing with you, so get over it.

Is this an apology for your stupidity? If so, I decline.

Quote:

Its clear that you are a basic forum troll, living in your mothers basement, stuffed full of Twinkies, so I'll grant you that, but don't hassle me nonsensical drama when every argument you make is going to boil down to semantics, I require more substance than that.

. Once again dear Exoter, you remain truly delusional.

Quote:

Now run along before you join Sauto on the Ignore list

I can't tell you how sad it will be for me to be put on ignore by somebody who doesn't know anything remotely insightful about football.

Exoter175 · 11-02-2014, 11:52 PM

I like your back and forth there. "okay that's great" to, "But that wasn't what you said here".

Cliffs notes Sorter, in a "hypothetical" situation, giving two examples, one might not match the other because its both hypothetical and an example.

You have a serious issue with grasping context here, no wonder you're butt buddies with Sauto, but I digress, you have an issue with comprehension where I'm describing a breakdown of a play, and then describing what the conversation might sound like between the mic'd linebacker and the coordinator. ***NOT THE CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MICD LINEBACKER, COORDINATOR, AND WHAT HAPPENED ON THE PLAY DESCRIPTION***

And of course, you're arguing semantics of the two because in a post I wrote over a whole 5 minutes at most, you're mad because I didn't match the defensive break down from one point, with the play call from the other?

Get real fatty, not only have you never played football IRL, but you're showing a serious case of trollism with your falter for semantics arguing and lack of context and comprehension.

Exoter175 · 11-02-2014, 11:58 PM

Matter of fact, Troll, lets stop the bullshit semantics for the moment, and get down to brass tacks.

Name one thing about Bob Sutton and this Defense that I've been wrong about that wasn't a typo (GOTCHA).

I'll wait. No other arguments please, just this one.

10-19-2014, 12:33 PM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4183447	Paging Exoter Exoter believes the Chiefs will either let Houston walk, sign him longterm, or will tender him at the 1st & 3rd round draft pick tender. I do not believe this. I think there's no way the Chiefs let Houston walk or sign him longterm this offseason. He's too valuable and maddingly difficult to sign. I am betting the Chiefs have to franchise tag him. Let's bet on it, since you were comfortable doing so in another thread. If Houston is on the tag (either playing or holding out) by Week 1 in 2015, I get to determine your username, avatar, and signature until Week 16. I'll let you back to normalcy by Week 17 and any playoff run the Chiefs might have. If Houston is not on the tag, you can name your terms.
Posts: 59,314

11-02-2014, 05:29 AM	#34
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4183447	Testing.
Posts: 59,314

11-02-2014, 11:52 PM	#44
Exoter175 Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $10003166	I like your back and forth there. "okay that's great" to, "But that wasn't what you said here". Cliffs notes Sorter, in a "hypothetical" situation, giving two examples, one might not match the other because its both hypothetical and an example. You have a serious issue with grasping context here, no wonder you're butt buddies with Sauto, but I digress, you have an issue with comprehension where I'm describing a breakdown of a play, and then describing what the conversation might sound like between the mic'd linebacker and the coordinator. *NOT THE CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MICD LINEBACKER, COORDINATOR, AND WHAT HAPPENED ON THE PLAY DESCRIPTION* And of course, you're arguing semantics of the two because in a post I wrote over a whole 5 minutes at most, you're mad because I didn't match the defensive break down from one point, with the play call from the other? Get real fatty, not only have you never played football IRL, but you're showing a serious case of trollism with your falter for semantics arguing and lack of context and comprehension.
Posts: 2,327

11-02-2014, 11:58 PM	#45
Exoter175 Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $10003166	Matter of fact, Troll, lets stop the bullshit semantics for the moment, and get down to brass tacks. Name one thing about Bob Sutton and this Defense that I've been wrong about that wasn't a typo (GOTCHA). I'll wait. No other arguments please, just this one.
Posts: 2,327