|
12-30-2015, 09:55 PM | ||
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $865208
|
Star Trek fans: Want another reason to hate Paramount?
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/12/30...r-trek-lawsuit
Quote:
While you're at it, why not lobby Congress to just put an ax to fanfiction and other fan projects that rely on funding from independent sources and don't seek to produce these works as a venture to make a profit? If I didn't love this franchise so much, I'd end all associations with any new movies and the TV series that I just know I'm going to get stuck paying the monthly fee for. |
|
Posts: 91,833
|
12-30-2015, 10:09 PM | #2 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Denver, CO. USA
Casino cash: $8664993
|
I haven't seen the project. Are they making profit, or just using the funds to produce it? I could see Paramount locking that down if they weren't going to just put it on Youtube for free. Maybe that's just the Jew in me, but that's why the laws exist. Sadly.
|
Posts: 3,642
|
12-30-2015, 10:23 PM | #3 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $865208
|
As far as I know, it's just going to go on youtube for free.
|
Posts: 91,833
|
12-30-2015, 10:26 PM | #4 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $865208
|
For those who haven't seen it... no, it's not the same thing as an official Star Trek movie, even some of the shittier ones. But it's brand new and innovative development of the universe that at least doesn't TOTALLY smell like shitty fan-made crap that usually gets put out there.
Somebody like Chris Conley could stand to learn a lot from the team working on this project. |
Posts: 91,833
|
12-30-2015, 10:28 PM | #5 | ||
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $865208
|
Quote:
http://www.axanarproductions.com/faq/ Quote:
|
||
Posts: 91,833
|
12-30-2015, 10:48 PM | #6 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Confusion, USA
Casino cash: $8540503
|
It doesn't matter if they're distributing it for the purpose of making money or not. If they're infringing then they're infringing and proving damages doesn't require the infringing party to make a profit of you can prove that the infringement impairs the rightful holder's ability to profit. Paramount can choose to turn a blind eye (and if these people really wanted to defend it they could use every instance of Paramount not enforcing their marks in support of their POV) but in the law (for the reason just stated) there is an obligation in certain situations to affirmatively pursue infringement of your mark lest the legal system conclude that you have abandoned your interest in those marks.
To fans it is a douchey thing to do, but I've had to send nasty letters to protect marks that I have an interest in many times and it usually illicits the same "what an asshole" response. |
Posts: 46,969
|
12-30-2015, 11:15 PM | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Denver, CO. USA
Casino cash: $8664993
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 3,642
|
12-31-2015, 12:31 AM | #8 | |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $865208
|
Quote:
In what POSSIBLE circumstance is Axanar in some way, shape, or form, siphoning off $150,000 worth of damages to Paramount? Shouldn't it be up to the prosecuting party (Paramount) to prove in what way their material is being used to cost them money on their brand? I don't know the circumstances of when you had to make such a call, nor is it really any of my business to judge whether or not you were doing the right thing. All I can judge is the application of this particular law in this particular case, and the answer always comes up the same for me. Paramount, through this little brouhaha, isn't being harmed with this Axanar movie... all they're doing is being a bunch of dicks. |
|
Posts: 91,833
|
12-31-2015, 06:09 PM | #9 |
Oh yeah..... you like that
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Casino cash: $10014832
|
reminds me of that movie that was illegally shot in disneyland. Disney chose not to give it unwanted attention with a lawsuit.
__________________
“You think Denver has the greatest fans? Well, they aren’t.” -- Jake Plummer Don't believe me? http://deadspin.com/sports/nfl/plummer-asks-the-world-who-wants-some-131609.php |
Posts: 1,811
|
12-31-2015, 07:55 PM | #10 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Casino cash: $-11497
|
I'm guessing that CBS and Paramount suddenly care about this because of the new Star Trek series. It's going to be streaming, so Axanar is perceived as competition now.
|
Posts: 1,429
|
12-31-2015, 08:13 PM | #11 |
Kind of a mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Donkey Land
Casino cash: $516899
|
I guess I have trouble being upset over a copyright holder going after someone who is clearly violating their copyright.
|
Posts: 52,332
|
01-03-2016, 02:13 AM | #12 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $865208
|
They have just as much of a right to go after fanfiction writers or people who have produced other fan-made Star Trek films. Why don't they? Is it because their brand actually isn't being harmed?
|
Posts: 91,833
|
01-03-2016, 03:41 AM | #13 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Casino cash: $-11497
|
I've seen it explained elsewhere that the difference is that they built a studio, and openly planned to use it to make other things after Axanar was finished. Essentially they used Star Trek to get the startup capital for a business.
|
Posts: 1,429
|
01-03-2016, 11:04 AM | #14 |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2003
Casino cash: $7737309
|
While I was rooting for Axanar, I'm only surprised it took this long. There is a difference between fanfic and a professional offering. Hell, they've got professional actors who've played parts in the Star Trek TV shows.
Horizon is probably next, but the actors actually look like fans and not pros (the captain is horrible), so they may be ignored.
__________________
|
Posts: 10,620
|
01-03-2016, 11:07 AM | #15 |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
Casino cash: $2081616
|
Let's be honest...they're afraid Axanar will be better received than the new streaming show or possibly the movie. Or at the very least, they don't want to have competition not completely under their control for both entities. That's not to say that Paramount doesn't have a legal leg to stand on, of course.
|
Posts: 103,223
|
|
|