Chiefs Meet With Otah

[Mecca]

In fairness to Rodgers he's looked good in his limited playing time.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Mecca

In fairness to Rodgers he's looked good in his limited playing time.

I know.

But the point is that there are people who are going to bitch, regardless.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by milkman

I know.

But the point is that there are people who are going to bitch, regardless.

I hear ya, I think the part of this that does grind my nerves is that every one of these OT's has a pretty substantial physical flaw even Jake Long.

Now I could point out some guys at other positions considered top 5 players that don't have any......to me you don't take a guy who has a flaw in the top 5 when other players have none. Especially at OT to me OT's aren't worth top 10 picks unless they are damn near perfect at everything.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by Mecca

I hear ya, I think the part of this that does grind my nerves is that every one of these OT's has a pretty substantial physical flaw even Jake Long.

Now I could point out some guys at other positions considered top 5 players that don't have any......to me you don't take a guy who has a flaw in the top 5 when other players have none. Especially at OT to me OT's aren't worth top 10 picks unless they are damn near perfect at everything.

But Dorsey's physical flaws are forgiveable? I wouldn't want to take a guy at #5 who has had leg problems in the past. By you're logic anyway, that is what I should think isn't it?

But I'll be happy with anyone we do or do not take, any scenario, except for Matt Ryan. I think there is talent to be had at QB in later rounds. If we were going to draft one, I personally like Flacco, not b/c of what I've read on him, but b/c of what I saw when I watched him play.

The way I see it, if the defense improves, not only will it be less stress on the offense, but more opportunities for them as well. I can see our O-line being better next year if only by subtraction. Probably not, but I like the possibility of these young guys coming in. I do think McIntosh would be a much better RT, I know he may have been fighting that injury all year, but he did allow something like 7 sacks, and left something to be desired in the run game. Which is kind of our offensive bread and butter right now.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by aturnis

But Dorsey's physical flaws are forgiveable? I wouldn't want to take a guy at #5 who has had leg problems in the past. By you're logic anyway, that is what I should think isn't it?

But I'll be happy with anyone we do or do not take, any scenario, except for Matt Ryan. I think there is talent to be had at QB in later rounds. If we were going to draft one, I personally like Flacco, not b/c of what I've read on him, but b/c of what I saw when I watched him play.

The way I see it, if the defense improves, not only will it be less stress on the offense, but more opportunities for them as well. I can see our O-line being better next year if only by subtraction. Probably not, but I like the possibility of these young guys coming in. I do think McIntosh would be a much better RT, I know he may have been fighting that injury all year, but he did allow something like 7 sacks, and left something to be desired in the run game. Which is kind of our offensive bread and butter right now.

You think moving a LT who isn't a particularly good run blocker to RT is a good idea?

[Raiderh8ter77]

if we get otah i am gonna kill myself

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Raiderh8ter77

if we get otah i am gonna kill myself

Good luck with that.