Chiefs Chiefs trade 34th pick for Cassel and Vrabel - Page 35

**chiefforlife** · 01:21 PM

Chiefs just got Cassel, ON NFLN!

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2009/02...with_patriots/

Quote:

The Kansas City Chiefs announced on Saturday that the club has acquired QB Matt Cassel and LB Mike Vrabel from New England in exchange for the Chiefs second-round pick (34th overall) in the 2009 NFL Draft. The agreement is contingent on both players reporting and passing their physicals.

“I have a long history with both players,” said Kansas City Chiefs General Manager Scott Pioli. “Mike and Matt are men that I respect both personally and professionally. I look forward to having them as new members of the Chiefs family.”

htismaqe · 02-28-2009, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I'll be honest.

I wanted no part of Brees.

Same here.

And it took 3 seasons for him to prove me wrong. They had to handle him with kid gloves for a long time before he would actually throw the ball downfield.

ChiefsCountry · 02-28-2009, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

if stafford is available at three we could make out like bandits trading down

Smart move there would just take Stafford especially if Cassell wasnt signed to a long term deal. We have the cap room to take both and then auction one of them off next year.

rad · 02-28-2009, 01:36 PM

Damn....I go out for a few hours and all hell breaks loose....Pioli obviously did not like what he saw from Jesus Sanchez at the combine.

**wazu** · 02-28-2009, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTG#10

Im pretty sure that turned out to be an impostor.

I thought we got confirmation via his facebook page.

Valiant · 02-28-2009, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

All this says to me is that Pioli didn't want anything to do with Sanchez/Stafford...

And I say who gives a shit...he knows more about Cassel than anyone.

Yeah I hoped he remembered Cassel had Moss and Welker at the Patriots and a top ten defense..

milkman · 02-28-2009, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81

You're right, I would have much rather had someone like Michael Johnson over Cassel and Vrabel.

I would rather have Mark Sanchez and Jamon Merideth than Cassel and Vrabel.

Pioli Zombie · 02-28-2009, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81

You're right, I would have much rather had someone like Michael Johnson over Cassel and Vrabel.

Who gives a crap what round Cassel was drafted? He's good now. If they got Brady would you pissing and moaning they got a sixth round qb?
Posted via Mobile Device

htismaqe · 02-28-2009, 01:37 PM

I wouldn't automatically assume Curry is the #3 pick.

Pioli isn't stupid, he knows what the value of inside LB's are. I could see us trading down and taking a more workman-like guy over taking somebody with limited game-breaking credentials at #3.

milkman · 02-28-2009, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebrad84

I certainly agree with you that Cassel has a lot to prove still. He had tons of weapons in NE that the Chiefs certainly don't have..at least with WR and O-line. But at least he's only a second round pick experiment, and if he pans out, great, if not then we look at Bradford next year maybe..

OK, I'd rather have Cassel than Bradford.

**SAUTO** · 02-28-2009, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Smart move there would just take Stafford especially if Cassell wasnt signed to a long term deal. We have the cap room to take both and then auction one of them off next year.

we could but i have a hard time not believing that we wont sign him long term.

BWillie · 02-28-2009, 01:38 PM

I don't like the fact that there is no longevity in this deal. We only get Cassel for one year. Two things could happen. What if Cassel is the next Tom Brady, how are we going to keep him? What kind of rights would the Chiefs have for him after next year?

HC_Chief · 02-28-2009, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant

Yeah I hoped he remembered Cassel had Moss and Welker at the Patriots and a top ten defense..

Steps are being taken to shore up those areas as well.

Vrabel = excellent leadership & mentor as well as player.

We still have the draft & FA to address WR and other defensive needs.

Sending Jared Allen packing instead of LJ will go down as Carl Peterson's most braindead move.....

**doomy3** · 02-28-2009, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I would rather have Mark Sanchez and Jamon Merideth than Cassel and Vrabel.

I would rather have Matt Cassel, Vrabel, and Aaron Curry/Crabtree/Eugene Monroe than Mark Sanchez and Jamon Merideth.

MTG#10 · 02-28-2009, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

I thought we got confirmation via his facebook page.

Nahh Im pretty sure I remember the guy claiming to be Thigpen apologizing to everyone and saying it was fun while it lasted.

**SAUTO** · 02-28-2009, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I would rather have Mark Sanchez and Jamon Merideth than Cassel and Vrabel.

but that would cost us #3 AND another pick

02-28-2009, 01:37 PM	#518
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $8149900	I wouldn't automatically assume Curry is the #3 pick. Pioli isn't stupid, he knows what the value of inside LB's are. I could see us trading down and taking a more workman-like guy over taking somebody with limited game-breaking credentials at #3.
Posts: 104,304

02-28-2009, 01:38 PM	#521
BWillie Are you ready to Rumble? Join Date: Apr 2006 Casino cash: $-1398759	I don't like the fact that there is no longevity in this deal. We only get Cassel for one year. Two things could happen. What if Cassel is the next Tom Brady, how are we going to keep him? What kind of rights would the Chiefs have for him after next year?
Posts: 52,747