Devil's advocate-Chiefs shouldn't have signed Cassel & should've waited & signed Vick

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Then your whole opening post is reeruned.

wow. reading comprehension must be difficult. I said they shouldn't have done this and should have done this.

I know that in reality they will do none of it. I am looking at a hypothetical situation. lighten up a little.

Here's the deal. Almost everyone thinks Vick could be a great wild cat QB. I think he could have been great in the spread that Gailey ran last year. He would have been ideal for it. They patterned the offense around Thigpen's strengths and made it work with this weaknesses. Those strengths and weaknesses line up pretty close with Vicks. But Vick probably has more potential.

I also think that chiefs fan quickly forget how good the defense was in 2007. The offense SUCKED and the chiefs defense was still almost in the top 10. Look it up. Look at the offensive stats and defensive stats.

The chiefs should have tried to get their defense back to the 2007 form and then build on that. Instead they just blew the whole thing up and now the team is years away.

I think if the chiefs would have drafted a few defensive players that fit the 4-3 and a few o-lineman and picked up Vick, and kept the offense and defense the same, that the Chiefs would be much closer to being in the playoffs than they are now.

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

wow. reading comprehension must be difficult. I said they shouldn't have done this and should have done this.

I know that in reality they will do none of it. I am looking at a hypothetical situation. lighten up a little.

Here's the deal. Almost everyone thinks Vick could be a great wild cat QB. I think he could have been great in the spread that Gailey ran last year. He would have been ideal for it. They patterned the offense around Thigpen's strengths and made it work with this weaknesses. Those strengths and weaknesses line up pretty close with Vicks. But Vick probably has more potential.

I also think that chiefs fan quickly forget how good the defense was in 2007. The offense SUCKED and the chiefs defense was still almost in the top 10. Look it up. Look at the offensive stats and defensive stats.

The chiefs should have tried to get their defense back to the 2007 form and then build on that. Instead they just blew the whole thing up and now the team is years away.

I think if the chiefs would have drafted a few defensive players that fit the 4-3 and a few o-lineman and picked up Vick, and kept the offense and defense the same, that the Chiefs would be much closer to being in the playoffs than they are now.

They were ranked #13 in total yards and #14 in scoring defense. You say almost top 10. I say almost middle of the pack.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

wow. reading comprehension must be difficult.

No. No it is not.

I know that in reality they will do none of it. I am looking at a hypothetical situation. lighten up a little.

Okee day then.

Here's the deal. Almost everyone thinks Vick could be a great wild cat QB.

Who cares? That is the question. Can the Chiefs quit playing college ball now, and go back to being a Professional Team again?

I also think that chiefs fan quickly forget how good the defense was in 2007.

The choices are,

a) I most certainly forgot and with good reason. Or,

b) Don't you mean 1997? Cause that's the last year this team had a defense.

The chiefs should have tried to get their defense back to the 2007 form and then build on that. Instead they just blew the whole thing up and now the team is years away.

First, No.

Second, "blowing it up" got rid of Carl and Herm. HOORAY for Blowing It Up!

I think if the chiefs would have drafted a few defensive players that fit the 4-3 and a few o-lineman and picked up Vick, and kept the offense and defense the same, that the Chiefs would be much closer to being in the playoffs than they are now.

The Great Haoli does not "do" 4-3. Pioli knows how to draft for 3-4 Defense( God we hope ), and Haley prefers the scheme as well; you're promulgating a hypothetical fantasy that had no chance in Hell of ever happening. And as for Vick; we've already got one of those and I can't stand the little son of a bitch. Why the **** would I want a 2nd?

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

wow. reading comprehension must be difficult. I said they shouldn't have done this and should have done this.

I know that in reality they will do none of it. I am looking at a hypothetical situation. lighten up a little.

Here's the deal. Almost everyone thinks Vick could be a great wild cat QB. I think he could have been great in the spread that Gailey ran last year. He would have been ideal for it. They patterned the offense around Thigpen's strengths and made it work with this weaknesses. Those strengths and weaknesses line up pretty close with Vicks. But Vick probably has more potential.

I also think that chiefs fan quickly forget how good the defense was in 2007. The offense SUCKED and the chiefs defense was still almost in the top 10. Look it up. Look at the offensive stats and defensive stats.

The chiefs should have tried to get their defense back to the 2007 form and then build on that. Instead they just blew the whole thing up and now the team is years away.

I think if the chiefs would have drafted a few defensive players that fit the 4-3 and a few o-lineman and picked up Vick, and kept the offense and defense the same, that the Chiefs would be much closer to being in the playoffs than they are now.

Sadly, reading comprehension is very easy for me. I wish that I hadn't understood your post. Had I not understood it, I'd not have felt subjected to such utter stupidity.