A few Chiefs' draft questions

[milkman]

Originally Posted by BossChief

I never said he was, matter of fact I said he wasnt if you would read the damn post instead of looking to criticize first.

I was 10 years old at the time, I had no idea what a 5 tec was at the time. Im going off what I read in the supplied links.

So, essentially you linked us to sites of people that wanted to shed Bruce Smith in the best possible light?

That wanted to make a case for him as a better DE than Reggie White, without actually having a ****ing clue?

Bruce Smith's sacks came in a 43 set.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by milkman

So, essentially you linked us to sites of people that wanted to shed Bruce Smith in the best possible light?

That wanted to make a case for him as a better DE than Reggie White, without actually having a ****ing clue?

Bruce Smith's sacks came in a 43 set.

no I just remember nowing they ran a 3-4 and when asked I simply punched in Bruce Smith 3-4 defense and then linked the page so you guys could choose which one to go off of.

I had no dog in this fight

this was zilla arguement, I simply posted that there were in fact a handfull of players that did reach the benchmarks he threw out there.

I even said I didnt agree with his side of it, but I guess I got it somehow pined to me, its cool though I have thick skin and its really not that big a deal.

I even went as far as to state clearly that both players never played the 5tec, but that evidently wasnt good enough not to get hazed, so Ill take it like a man and move on. No sweat off my nuts.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by milkman

So, essentially you linked us to sites of people that wanted to shed Bruce Smith in the best possible light?

That wanted to make a case for him as a better DE than Reggie White, without actually having a ****ing clue?

Bruce Smith's sacks came in a 43 set.

http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/story/757310.html

"Most guys that are able to get a tremendous amount of sacks are in a 4-3 defense, where they don't always get double teamed as much as I did," said Smith, who played in a 4-3 with the Redskins. "A lot of the great pass rushers usually had another dominant pass rusher along with them. Reggie White had Clyde Simmons (121 sacks, 13th all-time). You look at Deacon Jones, he had (Hall of Fame defensive tackle) Merlin Olson, the Fearsome Foursome, 4-3 defense.

"There were a number of other defensive ends and pass rushers that were dominant players. But when you accomplish what I did in a 3-4 defense you have to sit back, shake your head and say that's pretty damn impressive."

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by BossChief

http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/story/757310.html

"Most guys that are able to get a tremendous amount of sacks are in a 4-3 defense, where they don't always get double teamed as much as I did," said Smith, who played in a 4-3 with the Redskins. "A lot of the great pass rushers usually had another dominant pass rusher along with them. Reggie White had Clyde Simmons (121 sacks, 13th all-time). You look at Deacon Jones, he had (Hall of Fame defensive tackle) Merlin Olson, the Fearsome Foursome, 4-3 defense.

"There were a number of other defensive ends and pass rushers that were dominant players. But when you accomplish what I did in a 3-4 defense you have to sit back, shake your head and say that's pretty damn impressive."

He wasn't a ****ing 5 tech, Dumbass

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

He wasn't a ****ing 5 tech, Dumbass

I think I already said I made a mistake earlier didn't I? If I didn't or you feel it wasn't adequate enough, "I ****ed up and while reading about a few players, and I got my facts mixed up."

that make you feel better?

Now if you are a big enough man, you can admit you were wrong about the whole ****ing defense they lined up in because I was right on that much of the whole argument.

I don't expect you to though.

have a good one!

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by BossChief

I think I already said I made a mistake earlier didn't I? If I didn't or you feel it wasn't adequate enough, "I ****ed up and while reading about a few players, and I got my facts mixed up."

that make you feel better?

Now if you are a big enough man, you can admit you were wrong about the whole ****ing defense they lined up in because I was right on that much of the whole argument.

I don't expect you to though.

have a good one!

Go **** yourself, Dipshit.

NO ONE denies that the Chiefs of the early 90's or the Bills of that same era ran a 3-4, you ****ing reerun. As a matter of fact, I was friends with the Bills nose tackle, Jeff Wright, who played at Coffeyville with a bunch of my friends.

BUT, you tried to claim that Bruce and Neil Smith were 5 technique players, which is not only blatantly incorrect, but ****ing stupid to boot.

You'd be wise to shut the **** up but clearly, that's not your strong point.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Go **** yourself, Dipshit.

NO ONE denies that the Chiefs of the early 90's or the Bills of that same era ran a 3-4, you ****ing reerun. As a matter of fact, I was friends with the Bills nose tackle, Jeff Wright, who played at Coffeyville with a bunch of my friends.

BUT, you tried to claim that Bruce and Neil Smith were 5 technique players, which is not only blatantly incorrect, but ****ing stupid to boot.

You'd be wise to shut the **** up but clearly, that's not your strong point.

You love putting words in my mouth, I understand...

Go read the post I quoted of Milkmans that was the one I chose to go off of because you reped it as in wrong leaving "your a football reerun".

the last line says clear as day "bruce smiths sacks came in a 4-3 set"

I understand you want to act all high and mighty and don't want to admit you were wrong, like I did when I actually was.

Going back and reading my posts, I never even said Bruce played the 5-tec. I said (mistakenly and said it once before correcting myself) Neil Smith did.

My cousin in North Dakota played with Phil Hanson in college too, that is why I said he played in the 3-4 before providing a link.

Get over yourself.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by BossChief

You love putting words in my mouth, I understand...

I'm not going to go back and read shit.

You're just trying to cover your tracks after talking out of your ass. You clearly have NO knowledge of the players involved, hence your "Google".

Again, you'd be wise to shut the **** up but of course, you'll continue to make yourself look even more foolish.