Chiefs Chiefs tried to trade Charles

01-04-2010, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Baseless accusation.

I worked with Athan for 365 days. I say he makes stuff up. He embarrassed me repeatedly during my tenure and then squashed the legitimate information we had because A) it wasn't his story. B) the Chiefs didn't like the tone of the story.

Baseless from Billay? Perhaps.

Baseless from me? Not a chance. Where are the best reporters to ever work for WPI, gochiefs? The Mike & Mike team were the only hope for that organization. Why did they leave?

Titty Meat · 01-04-2010, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I worked with Athan for 365 days. I say he makes stuff up. He embarrassed me repeatedly during my tenure and then squashed the legitimate information we had because A) it wasn't his story. B) the Chiefs didn't like the tone of the story.

Baseless from Billay? Perhaps.

Baseless from me? Not a chance. Where are the best reporters to ever work for WPI, gochiefs? The Mike & Mike team were the only hope for that organization. Why did they leave?

Quit acting like you're better than everyone for ****s sakes I met you once you're a fat slob.

01-04-2010, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay

Quit acting like you're better than everyone for ****s sakes I met you once you're a fat slob.

I suggest you read the response again without all the nagging feelings of inferiority and the need to lash out at somebody else.

Hammock Parties · 01-04-2010, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I worked with Athan for 365 days. I say he makes stuff up.

I've worked with him for four years. I say he doesn't.

tk13 · 01-04-2010, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

I've worked with him for four years. I say he doesn't.

There's an unbiased source.

Hammock Parties · 01-04-2010, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13

There's an unbiased source.

And you think Phil is unbiased? Phil has 500 reasons to be far more biased than I do.

**chiefforlife** · 01-04-2010, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

And you think Phil is unbiased? Phil has 500 reasons to be far more biased than I do.

I dont care who is more biased. I would like to know why this wasnt reported until now? Thats all.

Hammock Parties · 01-04-2010, 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife

I dont care who is more biased. I would like to know why this wasnt reported until now? Thats all.

I'm not sure it wasn't.

**chiefforlife** · 01-04-2010, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

I'm not sure it wasn't.

I am.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-04-2010, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife

I dont care who is more biased. I would like to know why this wasnt reported until now? Thats all.

And I'll say it again:

Are uncompleted trades reported on often?

And when they are, aren't they usually well after the fact?

It wasn't news 10 weeks ago, because the coaching staff buried Charles on the depth chart.

It has a bit more relevance now that the kid finally got a chance (Thanks, LJ!) and has put up 1000 yards in 8 games.

**chiefforlife** · 01-04-2010, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

And I'll say it again:

Are uncompleted trades reported on often?

And when they are, aren't they usually well after the fact?

It wasn't news 10 weeks ago, because the coaching staff buried Charles on the depth chart.

It has a bit more relevance now that the kid finally got a chance (Thanks, LJ!) and has put up 1000 yards in 8 games.

Uncompleted trades often go unreported, yes. If this news has recently come to light, how, from where?
I dont like it when people just make statements and then dont produce a source.
If another poster on here said this, would you not ask for a source? Or would you say, "see Pioli is an idiot."

Titty Meat · 01-04-2010, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

And I'll say it again:

Are uncompleted trades reported on often?

And when they are, aren't they usually well after the fact?

It wasn't news 10 weeks ago, because the coaching staff buried Charles on the depth chart.

It has a bit more relevance now that the kid finally got a chance (Thanks, LJ!) and has put up 1000 yards in 8 games.

Heres the thing Warpath, I've asked Claythan to be a little more specific about where he got this information and nothing has been posted. How would Wipe know? I recall Claythan talking about how Pioli being secretive about info and not giving Wipe press credentials hurt the business. Why was this information not talked about until now? How can I believe a business that doesn't even have credentials?

01-04-2010, 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

And you think Phil is unbiased? Phil has 500 reasons to be far more biased than I do.

That's not true. Nick came through in the end. He paid me far more than $500. Still wasn't near what I was lead to believe but he proved himself to have some character when he could have just as easily walked away completely. I've forgiven him for that slight and have moved on. My situation is far better now because I'm no longer affiliated with Nick than it ever would have been with him.

I'm commenting strictly based on my experience while there and I say the guy is more fraud than legit.

Hammock Parties · 01-04-2010, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

That's not true. Nick came through in the end. He paid me far more than $500.

Yeah, but the bridge was burned.

01-04-2010, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Yeah, but the bridge was burned.

Yes it was, which is why I respect Nick's actions and have been able to forgive him. That bridge was torched but he paid me anyway. I never expected him to come up with a nickel more than the $500 but he did. It doesn't excuse him for everything and it doesn't buy my silence but it enabled me to move on and feel better about Nick as a person.