If you were an EMMY voter, what would be your nominations?

[irishjayhawk]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

The actors from Lost can eat a dick. They weren't convincing, at all.

If you want to argue they aren't worthy because they have given the performance before, that's a fair argument.

But saying they weren't convincing (those nominated) is rubbish. Their performances, by the way, should be independent of a writing failure - ie. religious bs.

[Red Brooklyn]

Originally Posted by irishjayhawk

If you want to argue they aren't worthy because they have given the performance before, that's a fair argument.

But saying they weren't convincing (those nominated) is rubbish. Their performances, by the way, should be independent of a writing failure - ie. religious bs.

Exactly.

And I'm sorry, but Matthew Fox has been earning Emmy nods for 6 years. Consistently. It's a shame it took him this long to be recognized.

But independent of how I feel about Foxy's work on LOST as a whole, he really did some nice work in S6. Does he deserve to beat out the other noms? I don't know. I haven't watched any of those other shows. But Matthew Fox at least deserves to be a part of the conversation.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by irishjayhawk

If you want to argue they aren't worthy because they have given the performance before, that's a fair argument.

That was my point about the cast and I said as much earlier.