Check this out: [8.4.2010 5792261] Notice of Copyright Infringement

[Reerun_KC]

Okay this is funny.. My son and I downloaded this movie about 3 months ago and watched it... Nice to see they are on top of things...

Dear Customer,
This message is to advise that Cox Communications has received a notice claiming that you are using your Cox High Speed Internet service to post or transmit material in violation of U.S. Copyright law. We have included a copy of the complaint, which identifies the party raising it and the material claimed to be infringing.
We ask that you review the complaint and, if it is valid, promptly remove or disable access to the infringing material. If you disagree with the claims in the notice, you should contact the sender, and not Cox, to resolve the matter.
As an Internet Service Provider, Cox is responsible, under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"), to advise when we receive a notice asserting infringement by you. We are also required to take appropriate action if further claims are received that you do not resolve.
The material that you post or share online is your responsibility. Cox encourages responsible Internet use, but we do not monitor nor control the information you share. We have a duty, however, to take progressive steps when we received complaints of infringement.
If we continue to receive infringement claims such as this one, concerning your use of our service, we will suspend your account and disable your Internet connection until you confirm you have removed the infringing material.
To learn more about your responsibilities concerning copyrighted material, please refer to our help article at:
http://support.cox.com/sdccommon/asp...a-4c6448f22d05
http://www.respectcopyrights.org/
http://www.riaa.com/ispnoticefaq.php - (General information about DMCA notices)
If you would like to reply to this email, please keep the subject line intact for tracking purposes.
Sincerely,
Cox Customer Security
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Notice ID: 22-94125217
Notice Date: 4 Aug 2010 20:33:17 GMT
Cox Communications Inc.
Dear Sir or Madam:
BayTSP, Inc. ("BayTSP") swears under penalty of perjury that Paramount Pictures Corporation/Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. ("Paramount/Dreamworks") has authorized BayTSP to act as its non-exclusive agent for copyright infringement notification. BayTSP's search of the protocol listed below has detected infringements of Paramount/Dreamworks' copyright interests on your IP addresses as detailed in the below report.
BayTSP has reasonable good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of in the below report is not authorized by Paramount/Dreamworks, its agents, or the law. The information provided herein is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, this letter is an official notification to effect removal of the detected infringement listed in the below report. The below documentation specifies the exact location of the
We hereby request that you immediately remove or block access to the infringing material, as specified in the copyright laws, and insure the user refrains from using or sharing with others unauthorized Paramount/Dreamworks' materials in the future (see, 17 U.S.C. 512).
Further, we believe that the entire Internet community benefits when these matters are resolved cooperatively. We urge you to take immediate action to stop this infringing activity and inform us of the results of your actions. We appreciate your efforts toward this common goal.
Please respond indicating the actions you have taken to resolve this matter. The provided link has been assigned to this matter. http://webreply.baytsp.com/webreply/...20a281a16c618a
For email correspondence, please reference the above Notice ID in the subject line. mailtoaramount@copyright-compliance.com?subject=RE%3A%20Notice%20ID%3A%2022%2D94125217%20Notice%20of%20Unauthorized%20Use%20o f%20Paramount%20Pictures%20Corporation%2FDreamworks%20Animation%20SKG%2C%20Inc%2E%20Property
Nothing in this letter shall serve as a waiver of any rights or remedies of Paramount/Dreamworks with respect to the alleged infringement, all of which are expressly reserved. Should you need to contact me, I may be reached at the below address.
Regards,
Mark Ishikawa
Chief Executive Officer
BayTSP, Inc.
PO Box 1314
Los Gatos, CA 95031
v: 408-341-2305
f: 408-341-2399
paramount@copyright-compliance.com
*pgp public key is available on the key server at http://pgp.mit.edu
Note: The information transmitted in this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
This infringement notice contains an XML tag that can be used to automate the processing of this data. If you would like more information on how to use this tag please contact BayTSP.
Evidentiary Information:
Notice ID: 22-94125217
Initial Infringement Timestamp: 4 Aug 2010 18:15:32 GMT
Recent Infringement Timestamp: 4 Aug 2010 18:15:32 GMT
Infringers IP Address: 68.12.209.193
Protocol: BitTorrent
Infringed Work: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Infringing File Name: Transformers 2 Revenge Of The Fallen DVDRip XviD-MAXSPEED
Infringing File Size: 1469734654
Bay ID: 19abc3ebf9ca970b72520f4eb430d93e340b368e|1469734654
Port ID: 52080
Infringer's DNS Name: ip68-12-209-193.ok.ok.cox.net
Infringer's User Name:
http://www.movielabs.com/ACNS http://www.movielabs.com/ACNS/ACNS2v1.xsd" xmlns="http://www.movielabs.com/ACNS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
94125217
Open
BayTSP, Inc. on behalf of Paramount Pictures
Compliance Manager, Compliance Team
P.O. Box 1314, Los Gatos, California 95031 United States of America
(408) 341-2300,(408) 341-2399
paramount@copyright-compliance.com>
Cox Communications Inc.
abuse@cox.net>
2010-08-04T18:15:32.000Z
68.12.209.193
52080
ip68-12-209-193.ok.ok.cox.net
BitTorrent

1
No
2010-08-04T18:15:32.000Z

Transformers 2 Revenge Of The Fallen DVDRip XviD-MAXSPEED
1469734654
- ---End ACNS XML
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 8.0
iEYEARECAAYFAkxZzxEACgkQ9Y9NMGKi0WhvEQCeN7/8TIrklJQ04IkYTUgHP0Au
2UcAn1i0ZZq/yE5ThlDiDUvEhJI/cPNA
=Dygc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by UCFGoldenKnight

This is gonna be the only thing I ever agree with you on.

How can you possibly believe Nirvana killed music? They killed hair metal which was stale and boring at the time. Please explain.

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Omaha

You must not be looking. What kind of music do you like?

You're right, I'm not, I don't have time to spend sifting through 100 songs just to find one I like. As far as what I like, mostly classic style rock; Styx, Eric Clapton, Moody Blues, early REO Speedwagon, etc. I'm convinced there simply isn't that type of music being made today.

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Radiohead was from the 90's, as was Muse. And Muse is hardly "indie", especially outside of the US.

Regardless, "Indie" bands aren't what's push mainstream movies, film and advertising.

More to the point, there isn't a Led Zeppelin, Who, Eagles, Beatles, Boston, Foreigner, AC/DC, Rolling Stones, Aerosmith, Guns 'N' Roses, David Bowie, Eagles, Doobie Brothers, Allmans, Foo Fighters, Journey, Iron Maiden, Kiss, Joe Satriani, Van Halen, Metallica, Pearl Jam, The Cars, The Wallflowers, Yes, ZZ Top or even a Stevie Ray Vaughn spurned from this decade.

It's been lackluster. There are very, very, very few bands and artists that will be around in five years that originated from this decade, let alone 20 years.

Many of those bands didn't make it out of their own decade. The Wallflowers???? Do we need another Wallflowers?????

During the last 10 years, we've gotten KOL, The Kooks, The White Stripes, Raconteurs, Spoon, Ryan Adams, Silversun Pickups, The Gaslight Anthem, The Fratellis, MGMT, Arcade Fire, Airborn Toxic Event, Stereophonics, Arctic Monkeys and several other bands that could end up being classics. It's hard to have that legacy when they're new.

Personally, I can't stand some of the bands you named, but that's bound to happen with any list of musicians.

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by Guru

My oldest has become a big fan of Franz Ferdinand and Arctic Monkeys. I don't really care for their music though.

FF has put out some good stuff, but Arctic Monkeys are GREAT. I love those guys!

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by Bugeater

You're right, I'm not, I don't have time to spend sifting through 100 songs just to find one I like. As far as what I like, mostly classic style rock; Styx, Eric Clapton, Moody Blues, early REO Speedwagon, etc. I'm convinced there simply isn't that type of music being made today.

OK, that's not really my cup of tea, but I do like a lot of stuff Clapton has done over the years. You might like The Gaslight Anthem. They have a very "classic rock" sound that reminds me a lot of early Springsteen but better IMO.

I don't have as much time as I did when I was younger, but I listen to Sirius & that introduces me to a lot of new artists that I like.

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by Inspector

Their website is at the bottom of my posts. Again, sorry to lash out at you - I know it's a much larger issue than one guy.

Hey, I just checked them out. Very cool! Not what I was expecting. Cool sound. Are they from KC?

[Reerun_KC]

Omaha, how old are you? nothing personal, just cuirous. Its about genre's...

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Omaha, how old are you? nothing personal, just cuirous. Its about genre's...

It's about genres to a point...although I think for the most part people like what they grew up listening to. Music evolves, but generally someone's taste in music doesn't. Although I am curious to see if some of today's young people are still listening to the same hip-hop music when they're in their 40s.

[Reerun_KC]

Originally Posted by Bugeater

It's about genres to a point...although I think for the most part people like what they grew up listening to. Music evolves, but generally someone's taste in music doesn't. Although I am curious to see if some of today's young people are still listening to the same hip-hop music when they're in their 40s.

would be quite interesting to explain that to you kids wouldnt....

At least we only had to explain lots of hairspray, sex, drugs (why they are bad) and broken hearts....

I couldnt imagine trying to explain to my kids or grandkids why it was cool to beat up women, shoot cops, sell drugs and respect... "you know waht I am saying?'

[Demonpenz]

well if you like classic rock. The strokes-last nite...would be where i would start.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Omaha

Many of those bands didn't make it out of their own decade. The Wallflowers???? Do we need another Wallflowers?????

While you may not care for The Wallflowers, Jakob Dylan is a very respected musician and songwriter. Their breakthrough record can still be featured some of music's finest players, including Matt Chamberlain and on guitar, Mike Campbell.

And they have a new album coming out soon.

Originally Posted by Omaha

During the last 10 years, we've gotten KOL, The Kooks, The White Stripes, Raconteurs, Spoon, Ryan Adams, Silversun Pickups, The Gaslight Anthem, The Fratellis, MGMT, Arcade Fire, Airborn Toxic Event, Stereophonics, Arctic Monkeys and several other bands that could end up being classics. It's hard to have that legacy when they're new.

The White Stripes broke through in the 90's. As for the rest, longevity is something that's rarely experienced by any band. Any of those bands could break up tomorrow and even if they don't, it's tenuous at best to say that they'll have an excellent body of work when their careers are over.

Originally Posted by Omaha

Personally, I can't stand some of the bands you named, but that's bound to happen with any list of musicians.

That's not the point. The point is that those bands have stood the test of time. Their music saturates the airwaves to this day. Their music appears in commercials, films and television on a daily basis. Who can ever think of the last episode of the Sopranos without associating Journey with the final scene?

The bands I've listed have transcended time and trends. It's still relevant today. It's difficult to state that the bands you've listed will be mentioned in the same breath in 20 years.

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

That's not the point. The point is that those bands have stood the test of time. Their music saturates the airwaves to this day. Their music appears in commercials, films and television on a daily basis. Who can ever think of the last episode of the Sopranos without associating Journey with the final scene?

The bands I've listed have transcended time and trends. It's still relevant today. It's difficult to state that the bands you've listed will be mentioned in the same breath in 20 years.

Iron Maiden is still relevant today? Um, no. Most all of the bands you've listed struggle with that outside of classic riock stations.

The White Stripes debut was released in June 1999, but that certainly wasn't the CD that broke them. Either way, I say they still make the cut.

I actually like the Wallflowers.

It's just as easy to say that the bands I've listed will stand the test of time as it is to say they won't. Some will, some won't. They're still putting out great music.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

While you may not care for The Wallflowers, Jakob Dylan is a very respected musician and songwriter. Their breakthrough record can still be featured some of music's finest players, including Matt Chamberlain and on guitar, Mike Campbell.

And they have a new album coming out soon.



The White Stripes broke through in the 90's. As for the rest, longevity is something that's rarely experienced by any band. Any of those bands could break up tomorrow and even if they don't, it's tenuous at best to say that they'll have an excellent body of work when their careers are over.



That's not the point. The point is that those bands have stood the test of time. Their music saturates the airwaves to this day. Their music appears in commercials, films and television on a daily basis. Who can ever think of the last episode of the Sopranos without associating Journey with the final scene?

The bands I've listed have transcended time and trends. It's still relevant today. It's difficult to state that the bands you've listed will be mentioned in the same breath in 20 years.

But dane, to my previous pt, good bands can't breakthrough to the airwaves bc of radio conglomerates. The good news is you're seeing a growing gap between horrible mainstream pop like nickelback and popular indie bands like radiohead (while they were around in the 90s, they didn't reinvent themselves until the 2000s to the sound they have today). No, you will never hear of nickelback or fallout boy 5 years from now. I know where you're coming from. For 5 yrs, I went to blink 182, everclear, and kings of leon concerts and I hated them--they played right out of a script and the first two were embarrasingly bad live. I've really gotten into indie over the past year bc the bands are becoming better and the live shows are terrific.

But there are several really good indie bands that are getting huge followings and their music is getting better. Band of horses, the shins, the black keys, and the arcade fire immediately come to mind. other really talented older bands like spoon, modest mouse, and wilco are becoming insanely popular. These bands will never be mainstream, but I guarantee that they stand the test of time bc people don't watch these concerts bc they kind of like them. They watch bc they love and follow the band. As for translation to movies, there are plenty of movies that use indie sounds very well and I could easily see them continue to use the same sound. Check out any of those bands--terrific music. I'd also say that music has shifted from musicians shredding solos. Its built more on interesting guitar riffs and hooks, and experimental sound--you should see some of the crazy instruments the arcade fire uses. Takes talent to make thos all work, but a totally different type of talent.

Is that all that different? I love led zeppelin and classic rock, but they're not mainstream popular. Instead, only people who appreciate music followed them and still do.

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

But dane, to my previous pt, good bands can't breakthrough to the airwaves bc of radio conglomerates. The good news is you're seeing a growing gap between horrible mainstream pop like nickelback and popular indie bands like radiohead (while they were around in the 90s, they didn't reinvent themselves until the 2000s to the sound they have today). No, you will never hear of nickelback or fallout boy 5 years from now. I know where you're coming from. For 5 yrs, I went to blink 182, everclear, and kings of leon concerts and I hated them--they played right out of a script and the first two were embarrasingly bad live. I've really gotten into indie over the past year bc the bands are becoming better and the live shows are terrific.

But there are several really good indie bands that are getting huge followings and their music is getting better. Band of horses, the shins, the black keys, and the arcade fire immediately come to mind. other really talented older bands like spoon, modest mouse, and wilco are becoming insanely popular. These bands will never be mainstream, but I guarantee that they stand the test of time bc people don't watch these concerts bc they kind of like them. They watch bc they love and follow the band. As for translation to movies, there are plenty of movies that use indie sounds very well and I could easily see them continue to use the same sound. Check out any of those bands--terrific music. I'd also say that music has shifted from musicians shredding solos. Its built more on interesting guitar riffs and hooks, and experimental sound--you should see some of the crazy instruments the arcade fire uses. Takes talent to make thos all work, but a totally different type of talent.

Is that all that different? I love led zeppelin and classic rock, but they're not mainstream popular. Instead, only people who appreciate music followed them and still do.

Great post. I'd like to point out that I don't think indie music has necessarily gotten better over the years as much as it's become more available over the last 10 years.

I was an indie musician throughout the '90s and we didn't have myspace, youtube, internet radio, satelite radio, or anything to get our music out. We had to beg people to come to our shows, book studio time & spend everything we had to have CDs printed. It was much more difficult to get our music out there & fewer bands were able to do it.

Now I can do it all in my office at my house. Record an entire CD, mix & master it, & burn several copies for friends. |The biggest difference is that there are so many more bands doing it these days because it's so easy.

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by Demonpenz

well if you like classic rock. The strokes-last nite...would be where i would start.

The Strokes have some good stuff. They're a little punky for my taste, but I like them. I've never seen them live. I'll have to check them out.