Football This hit is illegal? Foster v Ocho - Page 3

**pr_capone** · 08-18-2011, 11:13 PM

I may be wrong but it looks like Foster lit him up square in the chest well after Ocho had caught the ball.

I understand protecting a WR with this defenseless receiver rule but this looks clean. Does the NFL expect defenders to concede the catch? If so, prepare for the NFL equivalent of a soccer flop, basketball's jumping into the defender to draw a foul, and baseball's acting as if hit by pitch.

/not my own video

|Zach| · 08-19-2011, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

http://nflfootballnow.com/2011/05/25...-changes-2011/

I do understand whats written. I think enforcement where the head and neck is not involved will be rare.

Just Passin' By · 08-19-2011, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

I do understand whats written. I think enforcement where the head and neck is involved will be rare.

I quoted that because you were saying that leading with the shoulder would make it alright. A shoulder to the head/neck is also illegal.

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:37 AM

Defenseless, Unless he chooses to not catch it. Grr.

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

There are 3 things that need to be true for the hit to be illegal.

1) The player being hit must be "defenseless."

2) Contact must be made with the defenseless player's head or neck.

3) Contact must be made with the hitter's head or arm.

If any of those things are not true, the hit is legal.

BS.
One not 3.

That's before last "year" quotes, dumbass.

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:40 AM

[QUOTE=MagicHef;7835109]There are 3 things that need to be true for the hit to be illegal.

1) The WR being hit must be "defenseless."

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:42 AM

[QUOTE=Smed1065;7835125]

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

There are 3 things that need to be true for the hit to be illegal.

1) The WR being hit must be "defenseless."

No other 2 apply? You watch football?

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

I do understand whats written. I think enforcement where the head and neck is involved will be rare.

Yes you did....

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

This is a great way of putting it.

Yeah 2 years ago? WTF

|Zach| · 08-19-2011, 03:47 AM

Smed is incredible in that never once has he posted on this board sober.

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Smed is incredible in that never once has he posted on this board sober.

Really. Why I brought facts and you brought shit?

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Smed is incredible in that never once has he posted on this board sober.

Wow, I have no facts and messed up but I will attack his drinking from before (while lying) while I am eating more.

See last year and this year so far. Oh, I got sand in your mouth and assgina with facts not sucking off a previous nonfactual post...

You have never posted anything skinny here.

|Zach| · 08-19-2011, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smed1065

Wow, I have no facts and messed up but I will attack his drinking from before (while lying) while I am eating more.

See last year and this year so far. Oh, I got sand in your mouth and assgina with facts not sucking off a previous nonfactual post...

You have never posted anything skinny here.

I don't have a decoder ring for this post.

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

I don't have a decoder ring for this post.

It means you were wrong. Hit against a WR was last year, so the other 2 had to be there. NO

You just jumped another dick and sucked it without knowing and I am sad. Oh yeah been sober for like 18 months, how long you been skinny?

You said no post sober but no facts, just jaw work for sucking others dickrection.

**Smed1065** · 08-19-2011, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

I don't have a decoder ring for this post.

I have no decoder lips for your sucking off a misinformed post earlier....

But now attack instead of provide proof of that belief.

Just ball wallow now.

Oh, so you have not changed even if others do. I see.

|Zach| · 08-19-2011, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smed1065

It means you were wrong. Hit against a WR was last year, so the other 2 had to be there. NO

You just jumped another dick and sucked it without knowing and I am sad. Oh yeah been sober for like 18 months, how long you been skinny?

You said no post sober but no facts, just jaw work for sucking others dickrection.

I think you were better off when the excuse for your confusing posts was the drinking.

08-18-2011, 11:13 PM
pr_capone THREEPEAT!!! Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NWMO Casino cash: $9948214	This hit is illegal? Foster v Ocho I may be wrong but it looks like Foster lit him up square in the chest well after Ocho had caught the ball. I understand protecting a WR with this defenseless receiver rule but this looks clean. Does the NFL expect defenders to concede the catch? If so, prepare for the NFL equivalent of a soccer flop, basketball's jumping into the defender to draw a foul, and baseball's acting as if hit by pitch. /not my own video
Posts: 19,897

08-19-2011, 03:37 AM	#33
Smed1065 Supporter Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Returning From Hell Casino cash: $4873673	Defenseless, Unless he chooses to not catch it. Grr.
Posts: 10,200

08-19-2011, 03:40 AM	#35
Smed1065 Supporter Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Returning From Hell Casino cash: $4873673	[QUOTE=MagicHef;7835109]There are 3 things that need to be true for the hit to be illegal. 1) The WR being hit must be "defenseless."
Posts: 10,200

08-19-2011, 03:47 AM	#39
\|Zach\| For The Glory Of The City Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $3126768	Smed is incredible in that never once has he posted on this board sober.
Posts: 54,711