It won't be DeCastro. I'm still betting Kuechly. But here's a dark horse...

[SuperChief]

Originally Posted by BossChief

From what I understand, FAX has always taken these breaks from cp.

It's probably a healthy thing to do from time to time.

Mecca just had a complex that didn't allow him to ever acknowledge he was wrong and once he did and the team actually won games, he left.

It's a shame, he was a good poster, but he just couldn't take having all his knowledge blow up in his face so often.

This is what's going to happen to GoatCheese. The dude is just a constant storm of negativity and wack perception lately.

[Bewbies]

Originally Posted by SuperChief

This is what's going to happen to GoatCheese. The dude is just a constant storm of negativity and wack perception lately.

He will never leave. His position will change to whatever post whore side brings him the most attention.

Not that I'm complaining or give a shit.

[Direckshun]

I think if Barron's on the board, you gotta think he's in the running to be a Chief if we end up trading down to the late teens.

One of Barron's injuries was a double hernia, which is not a recurring thing. Barron's arrest was such a minor charge it's hard to get worked up about.

Instead, Barron brings toughness, versatility, speed, power, brains, and leadership -- he was a team captain for Bama, for chrissakes.

[Chiefshrink]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

I think if Barron's on the board, you gotta think he's in the running to be a Chief if we end up trading down to the late teens.

One of Barron's injuries was a double hernia, which is not a recurring thing. Barron's arrest was such a minor charge it's hard to get worked up about.

Instead, Barron brings toughness, versatility, speed, power, brains, and leadership -- he was a team captain for Bama, for chrissakes.

Is there room for 2 Ed Reeds in our 2ndary? I like the thought of that!

[buddha]

Originally Posted by sportsshrink

Is there room for 2 Ed Reeds in our 2ndary? I like the thought of that!

Wouldn't that be wonderful?

When the Chiefs used to have two terrific safeties, Cherry and Burress, the whole defense played at a higher level. Great safeties are a wonderful thing and it's often an undervalued position.

[xztop12]

I don't like the Barron pick because I don't like drafting defensive players in the first round that aren't very rare athletes.(I think Romeo agrees here, Pioli maybe not as much.)

Guys with Barrons size/speed/strength and hit ability are more common than guys with Poe's size that can move like him, guys that can play and have Brockers size/length, and guys that can burst like Melvin Ingram at 270-280... As a late first or early second the pick becomes more tolerable

[Bewbies]

Originally Posted by xztop12

I don't like the Barron pick because I don't like drafting defensive players in the first round that aren't very rare athletes.(I think Romeo agrees here, Pioli maybe not as much.)

Guys with Barrons size/speed/strength and hit ability are more common than guys with Poe's size that can move like him, guys that can play and have Brockers size/length, and guys that can burst like Melvin Ingram at 270-280... As a late first or early second the pick becomes more tolerable

Chapman is the NT you want in our D. Poe got a lot a tackles at Memphis, Chapman anchored the best defense in the land.

Barron and Chapman completes our top 5 D.

[xztop12]

Originally Posted by Bewbies

Chapman is the NT you want in our D. Poe got a lot a tackles at Memphis, Chapman anchored the best defense in the land.

Barron and Chapman completes our top 5 D.

theres really no way of knowing that. its possible but it could be other variables besides that, thats led to bamas success. do you ahve evidence for those 2 being the driving force to their D

[Direckshun]

There are players that made shit happen on that Bama defense, and others that coasted from it.

It's not hard to figure out.

Chapman, Barron, and Hightower made shit happen.

Menzie and Upshaw clearly benefited from that.

[Hoover]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

There are players that made shit happen on that Bama defense, and others that coasted from it.

It's not hard to figure out.

Chapman, Barron, and Hightower made shit happen.

Menzie and Upshaw clearly benefited from that.

Like Peppers vs Sims

[milkman]

Originally Posted by BossChief

@ sac still calling for ot

Actually, I agree with sac on this one.

If Albert or Winston are lost to injury, he's right, we have no one behind them to take over.

If sac's argument is that Reiff makes more sense than DeCastro or Kuechly, and that's how I understand it, then I, as I said, I agree with him on that.

Now I understand, also, that sac has had a hard on for replacing Albert for a long time, but if you take the argument he's making at face value without allowing his past dumbassery coloring your opinion, he does make a valid point.

I'd much rather look for tackle depth later, but were the Chiefs to draft Reif or Martin, that would not piss me off like taking Kuechly or DeCastro would.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by milkman

Actually, I agree with sac on this one.

If Albert or Winston are lost to injury, he's right, we have no one behind them to take over.

If sac's argument is that Reiff makes more sense than DeCastro or Kuechly, and that's how I understand it, then I, as I said, I agree with him on that.

Now I understand, also, that sac has had a hard on for replacing Albert for a long time, but if you take the argument he's making at face value without allowing his past dumbassery coloring your opinion, he does make a valid point.

I'd much rather look for tackle depth later, but were the Chiefs to draft Reif or Martin, that would not piss me off like taking Kuechly or DeCastro would.

DeCastro would be talented enough to start over Asamoah and Lilja. Reiff would be a backup. You'd rather use the #11 pick on a backup rather than a starter, even one at guard? That's messed up.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by milkman

Actually, I agree with sac on this one.

If Albert or Winston are lost to injury, he's right, we have no one behind them to take over.

If sac's argument is that Reiff makes more sense than DeCastro or Kuechly, and that's how I understand it, then I, as I said, I agree with him on that.

Now I understand, also, that sac has had a hard on for replacing Albert for a long time, but if you take the argument he's making at face value without allowing his past dumbassery coloring your opinion, he does make a valid point.

I'd much rather look for tackle depth later, but were the Chiefs to draft Reif or Martin, that would not piss me off like taking Kuechly or DeCastro would.

DeCastro (Like Matthews) can play any position on the o-line except Left Tackle.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

DeCastro would be talented enough to start over Asamoah and Lilja. Reiff would be a backup. You'd rather use the #11 pick on a backup rather than a starter, even one at guard? That's messed up.

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

DeCastro (Like Matthews) can play any position on the o-line except Left Tackle.

And Reiff could play any position on the O-Line except center.

If you draft him, you get a new starter at guard that all the dumbasses are clamoring for, but a guy that can step outside to LT if the need arises.

And yes, a good backup LT is more valuable than a starter at guard.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by milkman

And Reiff could play any position on the O-Line except center.

If you draft him, you get a new starter at guard that all the dumbasses are clamoring for, but a guy that can step outside to LT if the need arises.

And yes, a good backup LT is more valuable than a starter at guard.

He's not near the player DeCastro projects to be.