Chiefs I was impressed with Cassel - Page 11

**petegz28** · 09-09-2012, 01:53 PM

He didn't start to look like the old Cassel until the game was out of reach. His passes were crisp, ontime, to the correct receiver and he went through progressions. He marched us into scoring position until Moeaki decided to make a weak attempt at catching a ball which ended up tipped and picked. It was not Cassel's fault. The fumble was not Cassel's fault. The 2nd INT was the old Cassel though he was trying to make a play in a game that we were out of but nonetheless was a bad decision.

All in all he looked good. He was put in a position that he was literally forced to score on every drive and was doing a good job of it until some others started choking.

I'm not down on him yet. If our defense was worth half a **** today we most likley stomp Atlanta.

**Ming the Merciless** · 09-09-2012, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

Come on my Homoerotic friend..

Into the sunset we ride....

Just macho guys

not ashamed to be macho

in a non gay way

Just working out, sparring, and living life together

watching football and getting macho all the time

like bros

R8RFAN · 09-09-2012, 02:36 PM

Thats hawt

tredadda · 09-09-2012, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

Mother ****er looked like Aaron Rodgers first half and yall bash his ass..... Play some Mother ****ing defense and protect Matt and he can perform.. This is the mother ****ing NFL Dawg

Defense played like crap both halves, someone else not so much.

The Mayor · 09-09-2012, 02:37 PM

Matt Cassel can't perform when we need him to step up. He is a decent guy but horrible QB.

Red Dawg · 09-09-2012, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mayor

Matt Cassel can't perform when we need him to step up. He is a decent guy but horrible QB.

Good post and dead on target. This is the bottom line with him. Pure and simple.

tredadda · 09-09-2012, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mayor

Matt Cassel can't perform when we need him to step up. He is a decent guy but horrible QB.

That's what some don't get. He is not solely to blame for the loss today, but when we get behind he is not capable of leading us back, especially against playoff teams.

R8RFAN · 09-09-2012, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

Defense played like crap both halves, someone else not so much.

The DEFENSE gave up 40 not Matt, when you get down a team knows you have to throw, so they play the pass.... When they play the pass and they know what you are going to do it's very hard to succeed in the NFL.... this Matt bashing shit is stupid

RINGLEADER · 09-09-2012, 02:38 PM

RGIII is for real.

139.9 passer rating.

Damn.

**DeezNutz** · 09-09-2012, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER

RGIII is for real.

139.9 passer rating.

Damn.

Washington gave up too much in that trade.

**Ming the Merciless** · 09-09-2012, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mayor

Matt Cassel can't perform when we need him to step up. He is a decent guy but horrible QB.

You are the mayor of Greasy DIngleberry, in the country of Anusland, on the planet Tard VII, orbiting a star called Major QUeerbait Centauri,in a galaxy called Spazz-Gasm...in an alternate universe known as SHUT THE **** UP

Chiefnj2 · 09-09-2012, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER

RGIII is for real.

139.9 passer rating.

Damn.

Can't give up multiple first and 2nds for that. No way. We need the impact of Powe and Baldwin.

Pasta Little Brioni · 09-09-2012, 02:39 PM

They played D like the Raiders today. I'm embarrased.

jd1020 · 09-09-2012, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Can't give up multiple first and 2nds for that. No way. We need the impact of Powe and Baldwin.

We just needed a pick that the Rams actually wanted.

Sooner or later people will realize that RG3 wasn't going to happen. Look at what the Redskins gave up and they had a pick that allowed the Rams a chance at one of the 3 players they wanted.

Marcellus · 09-09-2012, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Washington gave up too much in that trade.

I don't know who all said that but the fact is Washington gave up better picks than KC even had.

Megbert · 09-09-2012, 02:40 PM

I was 'impressed' with Matt for the first half. But he did regress. Sure the D couldn't stop anyone. Neither could Falcons D for most of the game. So the fact this was turning into a shoot out and Matt C couldn't keep it up tells me I may have been hasty in being impressed with him in the first half. A good QB is gonna be able to say OK it's this kind of game (shoot out) and then not shit the bed. Which he did.

First half he was hitting receivers in stride, making good decisions. Even the first drive of second half he looked good. But after Suckup missed that FG it's like just reverted to his old self. Oh were down 10 pts there's no way I can do anything except shit my pants and make poor decision after poor decision.

I think last year Cassel had games like this as well though his good drives weren't all in a row for a game they would be sprinkled in with 2-3 3 and outs then a good drive 1-2 2 and outs then good drive. He can't keep it together for a whole game. It's that simple.

09-09-2012, 01:53 PM
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $2434127	I was impressed with Cassel He didn't start to look like the old Cassel until the game was out of reach. His passes were crisp, ontime, to the correct receiver and he went through progressions. He marched us into scoring position until Moeaki decided to make a weak attempt at catching a ball which ended up tipped and picked. It was not Cassel's fault. The fumble was not Cassel's fault. The 2nd INT was the old Cassel though he was trying to make a play in a game that we were out of but nonetheless was a bad decision. All in all he looked good. He was put in a position that he was literally forced to score on every drive and was doing a good job of it until some others started choking. I'm not down on him yet. If our defense was worth half a **** today we most likley stomp Atlanta.
Posts: 128,306

09-09-2012, 02:36 PM	#152
R8RFAN Molôn Labé Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: North Carolina Casino cash: $8566872	Thats hawt
Posts: 23,166

09-09-2012, 02:37 PM	#154
The Mayor Starter Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: NJ Casino cash: $9997072	Matt Cassel can't perform when we need him to step up. He is a decent guy but horrible QB.
Posts: 363

09-09-2012, 02:38 PM	#158
RINGLEADER In Search of a Life Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Confusion, USA Casino cash: $8590503	RGIII is for real. 139.9 passer rating. Damn.
Posts: 46,708

09-09-2012, 02:39 PM	#162
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $3628880	They played D like the Raiders today. I'm embarrased. __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 68,980

09-09-2012, 02:40 PM	#165
Megbert New and shiny. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: KC KS Casino cash: $9270260	I was 'impressed' with Matt for the first half. But he did regress. Sure the D couldn't stop anyone. Neither could Falcons D for most of the game. So the fact this was turning into a shoot out and Matt C couldn't keep it up tells me I may have been hasty in being impressed with him in the first half. A good QB is gonna be able to say OK it's this kind of game (shoot out) and then not shit the bed. Which he did. First half he was hitting receivers in stride, making good decisions. Even the first drive of second half he looked good. But after Suckup missed that FG it's like just reverted to his old self. Oh were down 10 pts there's no way I can do anything except shit my pants and make poor decision after poor decision. I think last year Cassel had games like this as well though his good drives weren't all in a row for a game they would be sprinkled in with 2-3 3 and outs then a good drive 1-2 2 and outs then good drive. He can't keep it together for a whole game. It's that simple.
Posts: 10,198