|
|
View Poll Results: Touchdown or Interception? | |||
TD - Seahawks win | 19 | 7.12% | |
INT - Packers win | 248 | 92.88% | |
Voters: 267. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-24-2012, 11:13 PM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Casino cash: $6993463
|
I vote homerun
|
Posts: 15,709
|
09-24-2012, 11:13 PM | #3 |
GBM 8-12-15
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dayton, Oh.
Casino cash: $10052154
|
Foul ball
__________________
2015 Adopt-a-Chief: Tamba Hali |
Posts: 59,997
|
09-24-2012, 11:13 PM | #4 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
INT.
Easy call. |
Posts: 88,960
|
09-24-2012, 11:14 PM | #5 |
Livin' in the Pacer
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $5916499
|
GOOAALLL!
But yeah, INT. |
Posts: 425
|
09-24-2012, 11:14 PM | #6 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Plano, TX
Casino cash: $9999900
|
INT unless you're a Seahawks fan, I would think. Even then you might say it was an INT and know that you stole one,
|
Posts: 22,188
|
09-24-2012, 11:15 PM | #7 |
Admitted Planet Junky
Join Date: Oct 2000
Casino cash: $651627
|
Paging Joe Seahawk.
__________________
Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism. |
Posts: 19,371
|
09-24-2012, 11:15 PM | #8 |
Roy E.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Olathe, KS
Casino cash: $10549646
|
Looks like an INT to me.
|
Posts: 23,013
|
09-24-2012, 11:16 PM | #9 |
Bazinga
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Springfield, MO
Casino cash: $3364507
|
No roughing the qb..... interception should have stood or PI on Seattle's WR and it 4th and 30.... should have not come down to the hailmary. But IMO that was and INT.
__________________
|
Posts: 10,198
|
09-24-2012, 11:17 PM | #10 |
Kind of a mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Donkey Land
Casino cash: $546899
|
In case there are any people who haven't seen it:
|
Posts: 52,317
|
09-24-2012, 11:18 PM | #11 | ||
Mindful Taoist German
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $7491662
|
I know a "tie ball" goes to the WR.
Looked like the DB only needed to touch dirt to have possession. So I guess my question is does it qualify as a "tie ball?"
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 74,925
|
09-24-2012, 11:20 PM | #12 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
But the defensive back touched the ball first, then the receiver tried to claim possession. In this case, it's an interception. The ref and replay official got it wrong. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
09-24-2012, 11:21 PM | #13 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $7642645
|
Quote:
The rule says that they must have simultaneous control and that does not include a player coming in after the fact. The Packer player clearly caught the ball. Tate didn't have any kind of control until the they were on the ground which would have been down by contact and an INT. |
|
Posts: 24,370
|
09-24-2012, 11:21 PM | #14 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Mar 2006
Casino cash: $3649900
VARSITY
|
Quote:
At this point, I wouldn't of been surprised if they announced it was first down for the Ravens. |
|
Posts: 22,274
|
09-24-2012, 11:21 PM | #15 |
-Bicho Grande-
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Florida
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Intentional grounding on the point guard, 2 minute penalty, replay 6th inning
__________________
Courtesy Of BoneKrusher |
Posts: 728
|
|
|