|
08-28-2000, 09:35 AM | #2 |
Guest
Casino cash: $
|
I believe this is true... to a point. You [i]must[/i] have a solid OL & DL if you wish to be successful. However, investing everything into great 'trench' positions w/o bringing in great talent in 'skill positions' (QB, WR, RB) = recipie for mediocrity. We all can see it... why can't Carl/Gun?
|
Posts: n/a
|
08-28-2000, 09:36 AM | #3 |
The Lurkiest
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Wichita, KS.
Casino cash: $4485999
|
100% concur! Lineplay is where it all begins! That's why we're carrying 10 O-linemen. Gaz should be on this topic shortly, requesting a QB crushing DE.
Phil saving Gaz some typing.... [This message has been edited by KPhobia (edited 08-28-2000).] |
Posts: 2,747
|
08-28-2000, 09:40 AM | #4 |
Stram was Cav
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $9044010
|
Not to steal Gaz' thunder [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/smile.gif[/img]
I agree that it is won in the trenches. I think that the Titans turnaround from perennial mediocrity to [i]almost[/i] SB champs was mainly due to Jevon Kearse. That's proof enough for me. |
Posts: 5,233
|
08-28-2000, 09:40 AM | #5 |
Guest
Casino cash: $
|
Eric -
I don't know. Great offenses - are they made by the line or the impact players? The Chiefs had great OL's over the years, but it never really got us past the 1st rd. playoffs (except when Montanna and Allen were in the same backfield). I think a great OL makes you a competitive team, but without a playmaker, you're not a contender, IMO. On the defensive side of the ball, I think it makes all the difference in the world. A great front four makes a weak secondary look good. Pass rush and the ability to penetrate on the run makes a defense (Smith, Saleamua and Thomas lining up on the line was imposing for anyone). Without it, your secondary has to be counted on too much. A good DL can get you a lot of 3 and out's. This is something the Chiefs need desperately this year. |
Posts: n/a
|
08-28-2000, 09:46 AM | #6 |
The Lurkiest
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Wichita, KS.
Casino cash: $4485999
|
You forgot Phillips, Chitown.
|
Posts: 2,747
|
08-28-2000, 09:49 AM | #7 |
THE RED MENACE
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Casino cash: $4968410
|
ChiTown,
I think you have to have balance, but I don't think you can get to the SB without good to great lines. Can you do it without a good to great QB and/or RB? 49er's have no oline, so it didn't matter that they had Young, Rice, Owens, etc. In Dullass their O-line depletions hurt them more than anything else IMO. Green Bay? Same deal. Then I look at Indianpolis. Everybody talks about James, Peyton, and Harrison, but I look at an O-line that is special. The Rams recently built a great Oline. The Jags and Titans have them as well. Even the SB Broncos had a very effective line (I stop short of great becasue they were more a scheme line). Tampa Bay has picked up some of the best O-linemen from the Vikes to play opposite what many consider the best D-line in the nation. |
Posts: 32,387
|
08-28-2000, 09:50 AM | #8 |
Guest
Casino cash: $
|
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Helvetica, verdana, ariel">quote:</font><HR>Smith, [i]Saleamua[/i] and Thomas<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Good to see others who appreciated Big Dan's contribution to our early-90s DL! [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/smile.gif[/img] IMHO, DT & Smith got most of the credit, but players like Saleamua(big-play, motor-running non-stop, locker room clown) are what solidify a line. We have Grunny on our OL -- he's the anchor... the catalyst. We don't have a guy like that on our DL. McGlockton fills that role from a physical standpoint, but he doesn't have the leadership ability. None of our other DL are leaders IMO. We need a charasmatic DT/DE like Saleamua again! |
Posts: n/a
|
08-28-2000, 09:50 AM | #9 |
Guest
Casino cash: $
|
Thanks, Phil, you're right.
He was a big part of anchoring that DL, and certainly deserves his due. |
Posts: n/a
|
08-28-2000, 09:58 AM | #10 |
THE RED MENACE
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Casino cash: $4968410
|
Yea, Dr. Z put Saleamua on his All 90's team. He was quite the player.
|
Posts: 32,387
|
08-28-2000, 09:59 AM | #11 |
9.89
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, TX
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Yes I think that you need very good play in the trenches to get anywhere at all. Look at the pats. Great QB, but with no o-line he is ineffectual.
On the balance side I believe that you need the playmakers also. That is why we drafted the cat. Gun said right up front that he wanted either a RB or WR. I think that means that He feels that we need both. This year we got the WR. If someone doesn't step up this year at RB we will fill that hole next year. Personally I'm glad to see the youth movement in full swing! ------------------ IDAHO CHIEF FAN!!! GO CHIEFS!!! it all counts now. |
Posts: 3,327
|
08-28-2000, 10:13 AM | #12 |
Feeling Victorian
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Nebraska/Wyoming/Colorado
Casino cash: $1546436
|
What Phil said.
xoxo~ gaz saving precious fingertip skin. |
Posts: 33,659
|
08-28-2000, 10:27 AM | #13 |
THE RED MENACE
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Casino cash: $4968410
|
To be fair to that early 90's D-line, Albert Lewis and Kevin Ross were pretty good at hiding receivers from the QB.
|
Posts: 32,387
|
08-28-2000, 10:28 AM | #14 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Kansas City MO
Casino cash: $10004900
|
You need both, but I'll take a pro-bowl QB over a pro-bowl left tackle in a heartbeat.
A good/great QB can get by with an average O-line (Marino, Elway), but a great line can't do much for an average/below average QB (Grbac). Elvis is living proof that having 3 or 4 potential Pro Bowlers on your line isn't enough. IMO, making the O-line the highest priority is a cop-out...a way for Carl to keep from admitting that he doesn't have the ability to select good skill position players. ------------------ This is my signature!! There are many like it but this one is mine!! |
Posts: 3,899
|
08-28-2000, 10:30 AM | #15 |
Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Well stated Jonesy:
You could argue that almost all sacks have an element of coverage. Not that many sacks happen in less than two seconds from the snap. You MUST have Dbacks that can stick to recievers for a while at least to give the front guys a chance to get there. B^2 |
Posts: 428
|
|
|