Chiefs Mike and Mike Talking about Geno going #1 overall - Page 29

Hoover · 03-15-2013, 07:48 AM

It was just a matter of time. Obviously the Chiefs don't need him

but they are helping create a market for a trade.

Apparently Jaws loves the kid.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-18-2013, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie

Choco-Penii Thunder FTW.
Posted via Mobile Device

That's gay.

NTTATWWT.

**RealSNR** · 03-18-2013, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan

enough, but the one i did watch, aka the kansas state game, how did he look? when he had to move, he didnt look very good did he?

Apparently you didn't watch the Kansas State game. Kansas State probably blitzed Geno Smith only once or twice. Most of the time they were doing a good job getting pressure on him using only 3 or 4 down linemen. They beat Holgorson's offensive attack by dropping everybody into coverage and letting all the short throws happen without any room to run after the catch.

That was a game where Geno should have tried to beat KState with his legs so stuff down the field would open up. That was his biggest problem in that game along with Holgorson being a ****ing terrible coach.

**The Franchise** · 03-18-2013, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan

enough, but the one i did watch, aka the kansas state game, how did he look? when he had to move, he didnt look very good did he?

So is it enough or one?

Dante84 · 03-18-2013, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapist

Apparently you didn't watch the Kansas State game. Kansas State probably blitzed Geno Smith only once or twice. Most of the time they were doing a good job getting pressure on him using only 3 or 4 down linemen. They beat Holgorson's offensive attack by dropping everybody into coverage and letting all the short throws happen without any room to run after the catch.

That was a game where Geno should have tried to beat KState with his legs so stuff down the field would open up. That was his biggest problem in that game along with Holgorson being a ****ing terrible coach.

Coupled with his defense shitting down their leg again. Dude pressed all season because of that, and no one seems to account for it in the national media.

Saccopoo · 03-18-2013, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan

enough, but the one i did watch, aka the kansas state game, how did he look? when he had to move, he didnt look very good did he?

Here you go cheese...here is Geno versus about seven first round NFL players. Most NFL teams don't have this much talent on the defensive side of the ball.

By the way, I love your "enough, but the one I did watch..." comment. Enough is one then? Idiot.

B14ckmon · 03-18-2013, 04:30 PM

Imagine Geno in those tight black/gold/teal jerseys next year. I can't even do it because I don't know what our new jerseys will look like.

I bet it will look good

Sorter · 03-18-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

The chances of settling the Chiefs' QB situation for a significant period of time.

In that case, I'd definitely roll the dice on one of the QBs coming out.

Alex has a 2 year contract. Hypothetically, KC doesn't give him a new contract. If he doesn't play well or even regresses, KC either turns to Chase Daniel or Stanzi or has to in all likelihood trade up for a QB.

It is better to use 1.1 on a QB that even if he doesn't play immediately, might secure long term stability rather than trying to trade up for a QB in the future.

Saccopoo · 03-18-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

Imagine Geno in those tight black/gold/teal jerseys next year. I can't even do it because I don't know what our new jerseys will look like.

I bet it will look good

Shuddup.

Everyone has you drafting Eric Fisher.

B14ckmon · 03-18-2013, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Shuddup.

Everyone has you drafting Eric Fisher.

That's because no one bothers to research our team and just guesses. That's why no one ever gets our pick right in their mocks. As soon as we sign a free agent RT they will wise up.

**The Franchise** · 03-18-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

That's because no one bothers to research our team and just guesses. That's why no one ever gets our pick right in their mocks. As soon as we sign a free agent RT they will wise up.

New GM and New HC.....even YOU have no ****ing clue what they're going to do.

B14ckmon · 03-18-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

New GM and New HC.....even YOU have no ****ing clue what they're going to do.

Of course not. It's exciting

.

Saccopoo · 03-18-2013, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

That's because no one bothers to research our team and just guesses. That's why no one ever gets our pick right in their mocks. As soon as we sign a free agent RT they will wise up.

Nobody gets your picks correctly because you morons take guys like Tyson Alualu three rounds before anyone else had him going off their boards. How can you predict stupidity of that magnitude?

And you'll be using Khan Jr.'s team of saber metricians to draft this year.

It will probably be an offensive tackle in all likelihood to be honest.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 03-18-2013, 04:40 PM

Sweet Chocolate Penii-Twinkies.
Posted via Mobile Device

patteeu · 03-18-2013, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish

You're trying to apply "Equality" to two different aspects of the draft simultaneously.

The QB position is the most important position on offense. The QB and LT positions with regards to offensive production are not equal.

The bust potential of the LT and QB positions in the draft are equal.

Two different things. Both are relevant in their respective ways.

That's not true, unless you ignore the individuals being considered. (And even then, I'm not sure whether it's true or not, but that's beside the point). That's what I'm accusing you of doing and you keep confirming it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish

So if the Chiefs are deciding between QB and LT with the first pick, and neither position has a candidate that appears to be vastly better, and the risk of bust is relatively equal, then it's smarter to go with the one who's position is more important to the overall production of the team.

Sure it is, but you can't impose that bolded assumption on everyone else.

patteeu · 03-18-2013, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception

In that case, I'd definitely roll the dice on one of the QBs coming out.

Alex has a 2 year contract. Hypothetically, KC doesn't give him a new contract. If he doesn't play well or even regresses, KC either turns to Chase Daniel or Stanzi or has to in all likelihood trade up for a QB.

It is better to use 1.1 on a QB that even if he doesn't play immediately, might secure long term stability rather than trying to trade up for a QB in the future.

The important part of this is how well they end up playing, not how long their contract is. If Alex Smith performs, he's going to sign an extension.

03-15-2013, 07:48 AM
Hoover Rufus Dawes Jr. Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $-231821	Mike and Mike Talking about Geno going #1 overall It was just a matter of time. Obviously the Chiefs don't need him but they are helping create a market for a trade. Apparently Jaws loves the kid.
Posts: 17,594

03-18-2013, 04:30 PM	#426
B14ckmon Jagwire Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA Casino cash: $10004900	Imagine Geno in those tight black/gold/teal jerseys next year. I can't even do it because I don't know what our new jerseys will look like. I bet it will look good __________________ Luke Joeckel - Chiefs LT of the Future!
Posts: 2,316

03-18-2013, 04:40 PM	#433
Sweet Daddy Hate Unsparing Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	Sweet Chocolate Penii-Twinkies. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 77,135