Chiefs Andy Reid tried to trade for Alex Smith 'multiple times' in the past - Page 11

ShowtimeSBMVP · 08-10-2013, 01:27 PM

Just a heads up: You may want to pick up a copy of the New York Times tomorrow and open up to the sports page. Your KC Chiefs will be featured.

Nate Taylor of the New York Times writes this piece, which includes some very interesting tidbits. You need to read the entire thing but here's what jumped out at me:

Reid: Starters will play more next week

1. Reid confirmed that he called the 49ers "multiple times" to try and trade for Alex Smith. We had heard this before, first from Trent Dilfer who labeled it a "courtship" at one point earlier, but this is the first time (as far as I know) that Reid has acknowledged it.

Just today I was talking with another media member about the game and I made note that I don't think enough people realize that Reid has wanted Smith for a while now, like he's been envisioning what he could do.

This little nugget of information makes me feel good about Reid's vision.

Also interesting: Is this why the price on Alex Smith was so high? A second round pick in 2013 and another high conditional pick in 2014. Because the 49ers knew that Reid had wanted him in the past? That sure would explain it.

2. Great quote from Alex Smith: "We'd love to stick it to everybody who thought we couldn't do it, he and I included." Alex Smith isn't the type of say anything controversial but he also doesn't give your stock answers. He puts some thought into it, which is why I like listening to him talk.

3. Reid goes over every play of every practice with the offense. He did not do that last year in Philly. That's part of this theme that Reid is back to coaching this year, and not worrying about the front office stuff.

http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2013/8...e-49ers-eagles

Here is a link to NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/11/sp...seid=auto&_r=0

Jakemall · 08-10-2013, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579

That isn't right in the least......

He had throws alone to Fasano, and McCluster for longer than that. So prolly about 12 yards of air yards. But still. Who gives a crap as long as the chains move and points go on the board.

They're subtracting yards behind the line of scrimmage. So screen -5..other pass -4 yards...ect. but yeah it was two total yards when you calculate it like that.

So what.

Titty Meat · 08-10-2013, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

The issue isn't whether it's sustainable. The issue is whether one preseason drive is enough of a sample size to definitively say "this is what we're going to do". A statement that's just as valid for the touchdown scoren as it is for the short passing...

That's why I think that, for real analysis, we'll need to look at what they do during game three, when the the offensive starters will be on the field until the early 2nd half.

Right. We'll have a better idea when the dink and dunks put defenses to sleep then Smith either hits or misses a guy up top. Or how he handles getting blitzed.

Hammock Parties · 08-10-2013, 08:05 PM

The issue isn't even if it's sustainable (it's not, and everyone knows we'll need to see more from Alex).

The issue is fans praising him like he did something awesome. As if we've never seen a friggin swing pass or a bootleg before. And yes, we've seen them in stride too, kiddies!

You'd think it was 1935 and we just saw the first forward pass completed by a Chiefs QB.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 08-10-2013, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

Is it really that hard to understand the difference between "So far, so good." and "That's good enough for me!"?

Perhaps you should go back and read that game thread.

keg in kc · 08-10-2013, 08:10 PM

No, the issue is that we have a bunch of people (myself included, I hated and still hate the trade) who have a preconceived image of Alex Smith. So even when they score a touchdown we have to find something to hate about it.

milkman · 08-10-2013, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

No, the issue is that we have a bunch of people (myself included, I hated and still hate the trade) who have a preconceived image of Alex Smith. So even when they score a touchdown we have to find something to hate about it.

The issue is that everyone is claiming proof for their side of the argument, regardless of side, when, in fact, we really learned absolutely nothing, and nothing was proven or disproven.

Fat Elvis · 08-10-2013, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clayton Bibsby

You're one of the few saying the former

You and Sweet Daddy Hate/Lil Chiefy are neck and neck for the dumbest people on the planet. As in planet Earth, not just ChiefsPlanet.

keg in kc · 08-10-2013, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

The issue is that everyone is claiming proof for their side of the argument, regardless of side, when, in fact, we really learned absolutely nothing, and nothing was proven or disproven.

Exactly!

Titty Meat · 08-10-2013, 08:23 PM

Does the dumbass know its clayton GRIGSBY?

**SAUTO** · 08-10-2013, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

The issue is that everyone is claiming proof for their side of the argument, regardless of side, when, in fact, we really learned absolutely nothing, and nothing was proven or disproven.

Perfect post here
Posted via Mobile Device

**SAUTO** · 08-10-2013, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

Does the dumbass know its clayton GRIGSBY?

Why you calling phobia dumb?
Posted via Mobile Device

**DaneMcCloud** · 08-10-2013, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

The issue is that everyone is claiming proof for their side of the argument, regardless of side, when, in fact, we really learned absolutely nothing, and nothing was proven or disproven.

What would be nice is a civil discussion about the Chiefs instead of the anticipated/invariable "I TOLD YOU SO!" bullshit that has permeated this site.

It's a good goddamned thing I don't own this website because if I did, GoAnus and his Clan would be banned for at least a year.

I'm ****ing sick of it and I guarantee I'm not the only one.

**mlyonsd** · 08-10-2013, 08:27 PM

He didn't obviously suck. That was my only concern.

Hammock Parties · 08-10-2013, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

What would be nice is a civil discussion.

Coming from you, King of Ad Hominem, that's hilarious.

**DaneMcCloud** · 08-10-2013, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER

Coming from you, King of Ad Hominem, that's hilarious.

**** you,

My shits no more about football than your stupid ****ing twat.

08-10-2013, 01:27 PM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3426009	Andy Reid tried to trade for Alex Smith 'multiple times' in the past Just a heads up: You may want to pick up a copy of the New York Times tomorrow and open up to the sports page. Your KC Chiefs will be featured. Nate Taylor of the New York Times writes this piece, which includes some very interesting tidbits. You need to read the entire thing but here's what jumped out at me: Reid: Starters will play more next week 1. Reid confirmed that he called the 49ers "multiple times" to try and trade for Alex Smith. We had heard this before, first from Trent Dilfer who labeled it a "courtship" at one point earlier, but this is the first time (as far as I know) that Reid has acknowledged it. Just today I was talking with another media member about the game and I made note that I don't think enough people realize that Reid has wanted Smith for a while now, like he's been envisioning what he could do. This little nugget of information makes me feel good about Reid's vision. Also interesting: Is this why the price on Alex Smith was so high? A second round pick in 2013 and another high conditional pick in 2014. Because the 49ers knew that Reid had wanted him in the past? That sure would explain it. 2. Great quote from Alex Smith: "We'd love to stick it to everybody who thought we couldn't do it, he and I included." Alex Smith isn't the type of say anything controversial but he also doesn't give your stock answers. He puts some thought into it, which is why I like listening to him talk. 3. Reid goes over every play of every practice with the offense. He did not do that last year in Philly. That's part of this theme that Reid is back to coaching this year, and not worrying about the front office stuff. http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2013/8...e-49ers-eagles Here is a link to NY Times http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/11/sp...seid=auto&_r=0
Posts: 23,755

08-10-2013, 08:05 PM	#153
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4310478	The issue isn't even if it's sustainable (it's not, and everyone knows we'll need to see more from Alex). The issue is fans praising him like he did something awesome. As if we've never seen a friggin swing pass or a bootleg before. And yes, we've seen them in stride too, kiddies! You'd think it was 1935 and we just saw the first forward pass completed by a Chiefs QB. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 279,111

08-10-2013, 08:10 PM	#155
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	No, the issue is that we have a bunch of people (myself included, I hated and still hate the trade) who have a preconceived image of Alex Smith. So even when they score a touchdown we have to find something to hate about it.
Posts: 58,682

08-10-2013, 08:23 PM	#159
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $1877558	Does the dumbass know its clayton GRIGSBY?
Posts: 75,558

08-10-2013, 08:27 PM	#163
mlyonsd Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Spink, SD Casino cash: $1273762	He didn't obviously suck. That was my only concern.
Posts: 38,935