KSU KSU v MU - 2-27-10 - Page 30

**ChiTown** · 02-26-2010, 07:48 AM

Discuss

Sure-Oz · 02-27-2010, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer bacon

Our team is used to bailing out Safford after he takes our first three shots and bricks them all. They were befuddled at what to do with an early lead.

Is it me or did Safford seem like a better shooter last year?

**petegz28** · 02-27-2010, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

Mizzou deserved to lose period....im just surprised ksu didnt kill us the way we shot and played

Hold the phone a second. KSU shot 19% in the 1st half. That isn't exactly what I call a deserving performance.

**KcMizzou** · 02-27-2010, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

In MU's defense, not having Safford for the first time on the road I think caused them a little mental anxiety.

I don't think that had much to do with it. I mean, sure.. Safford being there would have helped, but I dunno if it would have resulted in a win.

And honestly, I don't think Mizzou needs defending. They played on the road against one of the best teams in the country, and gave them all they could handle.

They just need to take care of business at ISU... that's suddenly a very important game.

kstater · 02-27-2010, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

Mizzou deserved to lose period....im just surprised ksu didnt kill us the way we shot and played

I'll give MU some credit. The win in Columbia intimidated KSU's team enough to play quite possibly the worst half off ball I've seen them play all year. They held(through intimidation and tough D) to 19% in the first half.

Sure-Oz · 02-27-2010, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Hold the phone a second. KSU shot 19% in the 1st half. That isn't exactly what I call a deserving performance.

Yeah, they should've made more FT's honestly and well both teams shot 32% just KSU had higher percentage attempts, hence the ft attempts

**petegz28** · 02-27-2010, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou

I don't think that had much to do with it. I mean, sure.. Safford being there would have helped, but I dunno if it would have resulted in a win.

And honestly, I don't think Mizzou needs defending. They played on the road against one of the best teams in the country, and gave them all they could handle.

They just need to take care of business at ISU... that's suddenly a very important game.

But when you starting lineup changes on a road game like this it can sit in the back of the players' minds. Especially the ones that have to replace him. We are still a young team.

**KcMizzou** · 02-27-2010, 09:34 PM

It's weird how when teams don't shoot well, people say they're playing poorly. Maybe both teams were playing excellent defense.

Sure-Oz · 02-27-2010, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

I'll give MU some credit. The win in Columbia intimidated KSU's team enough to play quite possibly the worst half off ball I've seen them play all year. They held(through intimidation and tough D) to 19% in the first half.

KSU's a really good team, i just hate losing like we did tonight

**KcMizzou** · 02-27-2010, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

KSU's a really good team, i just hate losing like we did tonight

That's the long and short of it...lol

And I agree.

Sure-Oz · 02-27-2010, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou

That's the long and short of it...lol

And I agree.

Probably why im bitching more than usual lol...gotta focus on ISU now, gotta win that.

beer bacon · 02-27-2010, 09:37 PM

I get upset anytime one of my teams lose. I don't understand the Kansas fans talking about how their loss today was a "good loss." There is no such thing.

**petegz28** · 02-27-2010, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou

It's weird how when teams don't shoot well, people say they're playing poorly. Maybe both teams were playing excellent defense.

We looked good on offense until the spurt where Paul and Dixon forgot WTF they were doing. After that we never really got back into a groove.

beer bacon · 02-27-2010, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

We looked good on offense until the spurt where Paul and Dixon forgot WTF they were doing. After that we never really got back into a groove.

The reason Paul and Dixon were out there so long was because Taylor and Tiller both got in foul trouble. Paul turned into an idiot after he hit a couple threes.

Sure-Oz · 02-27-2010, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer bacon

I get upset anytime one of my teams lose. I don't understand the Kansas fans talking about how their loss today was a "good loss." There is no such thing.

I was talking about this earlier after watching the loss of ku that their fans would say this would help them. Of course it does....now they arent in cruise control and more focused, losses ****ing suck, period!

'Hamas' Jenkins · 02-27-2010, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer bacon

The reason Paul and Dixon were out there so long was because Taylor and Tiller both got in foul trouble. Paul turned into an idiot after he hit a couple threes.

Paul's always been a ****ing idiot.

02-26-2010, 07:48 AM
ChiTown Stroking to the SB Champs! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Flatlands of Kansas Casino cash: $2923962	KSU v MU - 2-27-10 Discuss
Posts: 39,381

02-27-2010, 09:34 PM	#442
KcMizzou Supporter Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Parkville MO Casino cash: $10005170	It's weird how when teams don't shoot well, people say they're playing poorly. Maybe both teams were playing excellent defense.
Posts: 54,695

02-27-2010, 09:37 PM	#446
beer bacon WHAT Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Kansas City, MO Casino cash: $10019545	I get upset anytime one of my teams lose. I don't understand the Kansas fans talking about how their loss today was a "good loss." There is no such thing.
Posts: 9,301