Chiefs The Myths of Why We Shouldn't Play Croyle..

**petegz28** · 10-10-2010, 07:25 PM

Myth #1: He will just get hurt.

If that's the case WTF is he our #2 then? If Cassel gets hurt he is going in, so what then?

Myth #2: He is 0-9 as a starter so he can't do the job.

What ****ing job? Hand the ball off? What is it that Cassel does that makes some think Brodie can't do the same if not better?

Nevermind that 8 of Croyle's losses came behind one of the worst offensive lines in Chiefs history with absolutely 0 pass protection and 0 running game.

The 1 game Brodie started under Haley he did ok in until late. I firmly believe had he had more time with the starters the 4 TD's he overthrew against Baltimore would have turned out different

Myth #3: He isn't the long term answer.

I agree, but neither is ****ing Cassel. As much as I like what we are doing right now is actually not a bad time to change QB's.

When it comes down to it you have to look at things this year. Cassel has taken 2 sacks in 4 games. Meaning the O-line is much better in protection and we have a great running game to help him. Croyle, while not a long term answer, can actually throw the ****ing ball with some zip on it for more than 5 yards.

**DeezNutz** · 10-10-2010, 07:26 PM

Why are you worried about QB play, pete?

We have a solid D and run game, and these are more important.

**petegz28** · 10-10-2010, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Why are you worried about QB play, pete?

We have a solid D and run game, and these are more important.

I would like at least average QB play. I think that is just a minimum on any team. With our defense and running game an average QB would suffice for the time being.

**DeezNutz** · 10-10-2010, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

I would like at least average QB play. I think that is just a minimum on any team. With our defense and running game an average QB would suffice for the time being.

Define "suffice"? It's entirely possible that we're going to take our current sack of shit to the post season. Could we win it all with "average"?

**petegz28** · 10-10-2010, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Define "suffice"? It's entirely possible that we're going to take our current sack of shit to the post season. Could we win it all with "average"?

If the defense and running game continue as they have then I think "average" would give us a better shot than Cassel.

Pablo · 10-10-2010, 07:27 PM

Trade Bowe and a bag of Arthur Bryant's to Miami for Thigpen.

BRING BACK HOPE.

**Bane** · 10-10-2010, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

Trade Bowe and a bag of Arthur Bryant's to Miami for Thigpen.

BRING BACK HOPE.

Thig Lyfe · 10-10-2010, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

Trade Bowe and a bag of Arthur Bryant's to Miami for Thigpen.

BRING BACK HOPE.

KEEP HOPE ALIVE!!!

Marcellus · 10-10-2010, 07:27 PM

Croyle being 0-9 as a starter isn't a myth.

How about this, the guy has never been impressive. He isn't accurate he isn't mobile. I say that as a person who rooted like hell for him after we drafted him.

He throws the ball hard. That's all he has got.

At this point I don't give a shit, start him but he is nothing special.

**petegz28** · 10-10-2010, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Croyle being 0-9 as a starter isn't a myth.

How about this, the guy has never been impressive. He isn't accurate he isn't mobile. I say that as a person who rooted like hell for him after we drafted him.

He throws the ball hard. That's all he has got.

At this point I don't give a shit, start him but he is nothing special.

I never said he was "special". But considering the alternative he doesn't look so bad if you ask me.

Pablo · 10-10-2010, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Croyle being 0-9 as a starter isn't a myth.

How about this, the guy has never been impressive. He isn't accurate he isn't mobile. I say that as a person who rooted like hell for him after we drafted him.

He throws the ball hard. That's all he has got.

At this point I don't give a shit, start him but he is nothing special.

Sounds an awful lot like our #1 QB, except for the whole throwing the ball hard thing.

prhom · 10-10-2010, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Croyle being 0-9 as a starter isn't a myth.

How about this, the guy has never been impressive. He isn't accurate he isn't mobile. I say that as a person who rooted like hell for him after we drafted him.

He throws the ball hard. That's all he has got.

At this point I don't give a shit, start him but he is nothing special.

I don't think you can say he's not accurate. Football is a little like poker, you don't always have to complete a pass over 20 yards, but if the other team thinks you might you've accomplished something. I think that alone would help the run game continue to be successful.

Marcellus · 10-10-2010, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prhom

I don't think you can say he's not accurate. Football is a little like poker, you don't always have to complete a pass over 20 yards, but if the other team thinks you might you've accomplished something. I think that alone would help the run game continue to be successful.

Yea I can say that, he throws the ball hard when the receiver is 4 yards from him. He has no touch an he isn't accurate. That's the facts.

**petegz28** · 10-10-2010, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Yea I can say that, he throws the ball hard when the receiver is 4 yards from him. He has no touch an he isn't accurate. That's the facts.

Sadly that is still better than Cassel

**BigMeatballDave** · 10-10-2010, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Yea I can say that, he throws the ball hard when the receiver is 4 yards from him. He has no touch an he isn't accurate. That's the facts.

You are completely missing the point of all this. No one here thinks Brodie could be the future here. People just want to see something different. Croyle has a live arm, Cassel does not. They need to try something. Its obvious this Cassel experiment is not working.

10-10-2010, 07:25 PM	Topic Starter
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $2574127	The Myths of Why We Shouldn't Play Croyle.. Myth #1: He will just get hurt. If that's the case WTF is he our #2 then? If Cassel gets hurt he is going in, so what then? Myth #2: He is 0-9 as a starter so he can't do the job. What **ing job? Hand the ball off? What is it that Cassel does that makes some think Brodie can't do the same if not better? Nevermind that 8 of Croyle's losses came behind one of the worst offensive lines in Chiefs history with absolutely 0 pass protection and 0 running game. The 1 game Brodie started under Haley he did ok in until late. I firmly believe had he had more time with the starters the 4 TD's he overthrew against Baltimore would have turned out different Myth #3: He isn't the long term answer. I agree, but neither is ing Cassel. As much as I like what we are doing right now is actually not a bad time to change QB's. When it comes down to it you have to look at things this year. Cassel has taken 2 sacks in 4 games. Meaning the O-line is much better in protection and we have a great running game to help him. Croyle, while not a long term answer, can actually throw the **ing ball with some zip on it for more than 5 yards.
Posts: 128,221

10-10-2010, 07:27 PM	#6
Pablo Ultrabanned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $1799356	Trade Bowe and a bag of Arthur Bryant's to Miami for Thigpen. BRING BACK HOPE.
Posts: 40,520

10-10-2010, 07:27 PM	#9
Marcellus Diablo Negro Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $2872662	Croyle being 0-9 as a starter isn't a myth. How about this, the guy has never been impressive. He isn't accurate he isn't mobile. I say that as a person who rooted like hell for him after we drafted him. He throws the ball hard. That's all he has got. At this point I don't give a shit, start him but he is nothing special.
Posts: 69,424