More Clinton Slim - Page 3

NaptownChief · 06-28-2001, 09:28 PM

I have not verified the truth to this but I received this email. Knowing Sick Willie and Hillary as we all do, this does not seem like a stretch....Pretty disgusting if it is true.

"Talking about the Clinton's, it's common knowledge that, in order
for her to establish NYS residency, they purchased a million + house in upscale Chappaqua, NY. Makes sense. Now, they are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense? Here is where it becomes interesting. A residency had to be built in order to house the Secret Service agents. The Clinton's now charge the Secret Service rent for the use of said residence, and that rent is just about equal to their mortgage payment, meaning that we, the tax payers, are paying the Clinton's mortgage and it's all perfectly legal."

bkkcoh · 07-02-2001, 06:37 AM

I find it absolutely amazing that people thought this was true about the Clintons. This is a sad state when something like this could be perceived as true. I think this clearly states what some people think of the leader of the administration.

Jim Hunter · 07-02-2001, 07:13 AM

I'm not sure about the logic of this argument. If a residency hadn't been built by the Clintons to house the Secret Service personell what would have been done instead? Most likely the Government would have paid outright to build a residency for them. Would that have saved the tax-payers any money? With the Governments past penchant for overspending, the residency might have cost many times more than what they will pay in rent. I can't call the kettle black either, as I take advantage of every tax break and angle that I can to maximize my returns each year. Who doesn't ???

06-28-2001, 09:28 PM
NaptownChief Football Pimp Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Indianapolis,IN Casino cash: $9974900	More Clinton Slim I have not verified the truth to this but I received this email. Knowing Sick Willie and Hillary as we all do, this does not seem like a stretch....Pretty disgusting if it is true. "Talking about the Clinton's, it's common knowledge that, in order for her to establish NYS residency, they purchased a million + house in upscale Chappaqua, NY. Makes sense. Now, they are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense? Here is where it becomes interesting. A residency had to be built in order to house the Secret Service agents. The Clinton's now charge the Secret Service rent for the use of said residence, and that rent is just about equal to their mortgage payment, meaning that we, the tax payers, are paying the Clinton's mortgage and it's all perfectly legal."
Posts: 4,357

07-02-2001, 06:37 AM	#31
bkkcoh MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Lewis Center, Ohio USA Casino cash: $9805595	Isn't Amazing people thought this was true I find it absolutely amazing that people thought this was true about the Clintons. This is a sad state when something like this could be perceived as true. I think this clearly states what some people think of the leader of the administration. __________________ Brian K. Aspire to Inspire before you Expire
Posts: 5,506

07-02-2001, 07:13 AM	#32
Jim Hunter Rookie Join Date: May 2001 Location: Colorado - Western Slope Casino cash: $10004900	I'm not sure about the logic of this argument. If a residency hadn't been built by the Clintons to house the Secret Service personell what would have been done instead? Most likely the Government would have paid outright to build a residency for them. Would that have saved the tax-payers any money? With the Governments past penchant for overspending, the residency might have cost many times more than what they will pay in rent. I can't call the kettle black either, as I take advantage of every tax break and angle that I can to maximize my returns each year. Who doesn't ???
Posts: 19