I'm watching the Lions spread it out and pass ALL OVER the Vikings...

htismaqe · 09-21-2007, 07:22 PM

But you can bet you're ass we won't do anything close to it...

htismaqe · 09-21-2007, 07:51 PM

They just cut away to show Hester's TD return and then the announcer of the Vikes/Lions game made a comment about how much easier it was for the Bears to score now that they're playing the Chiefs. Jayice Pearson just laughed. He knows how bad the Chiefs suck...

Hammock Parties · 09-21-2007, 07:53 PM

I watched both of their games. Their LBs suck for a Cover 2 defense...but we won't take advantage of it. We're gonna pound Larry's dick into Casey Wiegmann's ass 40 times until Dustin Colquitt's leg falls off.

And they are going to blitz the HELL out of us. We might see Brodie, because there's a very good chance Huard gets hurt.

I'm predicting a loss.

htismaqe · 09-21-2007, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

I watched both of their games. Their LBs suck for a Cover 2 defense...but we won't take advantage of it. We're gonna pound Larry's dick into Casey Wiegmann's ass 40 times until Dustin Colquitt's leg falls off.

Henderson is faster and superior to Nap in both run support and pass coverage.

And Greenway is absolutely as good as DJ.

We have Donnie Edwards, but their tackles are infinitely better than ours are.

That being said, they run Cover 2. They're vulnerable up the seems and the Lions exploited it up to the point where Kitna got hurt. We won't be doing any of that.

Direckshun · 09-21-2007, 07:57 PM

This season has so far been a repeat of the 2006 season; I don't see why this won't be the same as the San Francisco game.

1st game -- Disappointing loss that was a perceived opportunity for victory.
2nd game -- Surprisingly close loss that was a perceived opportunity to get blown out.
3rd game -- Offense at home against iffy defense finally opens up and Chiefs roll big.

It's entirely possible the Chiefs open up their offense and put up some points. And the Vikings LITERALLY have ONE weapon on offense.

I'm predicting a win, even though I don't have those fancy press credentials and people don't pay to read my opinion.

Hammock Parties · 09-21-2007, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Henderson is faster and superior to Nap in both run support and pass coverage.

And Greenway is absolutely as good as DJ.

We have Donnie Edwards, but their tackles are infinitely better than ours are.

That being said, they run Cover 2. They're vulnerable up the seems and the Lions exploited it up to the point where Kitna got hurt. We won't be doing any of that.

They don't run Cover 2 like they used to....there's a ton of blitzing going on. Although there was more in the Atlanta game. They played Detroit more conservatively.

I'm sure you've noticed how they don't give up anything on inside runs...and I mean ANYTHING. It's a nightmare.

Hammock Parties · 09-21-2007, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

I don't see why this won't be the same as the San Francisco game.

Because Minnesota has a great defense.

Direckshun · 09-21-2007, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Henderson is faster and superior to Nap in both run support and pass coverage.

And Greenway is absolutely as good as DJ.

We have Donnie Edwards, but their tackles are infinitely better than ours are.

The Vikings' D is largely untalented, but looks a lot better than it is because they have the best DT tandemn in the NFL. Henderson looks great in run coverage compared to Nap because the Williams' brothers absorb the entire OL. Greenway doesn't have DJ's physical tools, but he does seem to have a lick of talent.

Direckshun · 09-21-2007, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

Because Minnesota has a great defense.

Minnesota has a decent defense with one of the best DT tandems in the history of the NFL.

**Buehler445** · 09-21-2007, 08:00 PM

I agree with htismaq. I posted it in another thread. I think in order to be successful, we need to pass the ball effectively (more than a pass in the flat to Wilson). I don't think LJ can pound it against 9 man fronts anymore. He just can't do it and win games.

I honestly think Brodie with or without turnovers gives us the best chance to win the game. He is more mobile, he isn't scared to the point that he starts the throw to his checkdown before he finishes his drop, he throws the ball better, especially downfield, seems to be making better decisions, and most importantly CAN MOVE THE CHAINS.

Huard isn't playing mistake free this year. I would rather watch Croyle take sacks and throw INTs than Huard. To compound that, 4 first downs and an INT gives the defense a lot more rest than a 3 and out.

Hammock Parties · 09-21-2007, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

The Vikings' D is largely untalented

You're on crack. Dwight Smith, Darren Sharper, Antoine Winfield...i like Henderson and Greenway, and their DEs are solid.

Minnesota will have the best defense on the field Sunday.

htismaqe · 09-21-2007, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

They don't run Cover 2 like they used to....there's a ton of blitzing going on. Although there was more in the Atlanta game. They played Detroit more conservatively.

I'm sure you've noticed how they don't give up anything on inside runs...and I mean ANYTHING. It's a nightmare.

They don't run the Tampa 2, but they do run cover 2. Whether they're blitzing or not, the 2 safeties are always deep.

htismaqe · 09-21-2007, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

The Vikings' D is largely untalented, but looks a lot better than it is because they have the best DT tandemn in the NFL. Henderson looks great in run coverage compared to Nap because the Williams' brothers absorb the entire OL. Greenway doesn't have DJ's physical tools, but he does seem to have a lick of talent.

Top to bottom, their defense is more talented than ours...

Hammock Parties · 09-21-2007, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

They don't run the Tampa 2, but they do run cover 2. Whether they're blitzing or not, the 2 safeties are always deep.

Watch the Atlanta game. They'll send the house on a blitz. They were sending safeties at times.

Their DC played on the '85 Bears....he's much more agressive. I was reminded of our gunther/herm hybrid a great deal.

htismaqe · 09-21-2007, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

Watch the Atlanta game. They'll send the house on a blitz. They were sending safeties at times.

Their DC played on the '85 Bears....he's much more agressive. I was reminded of our gunther/herm hybrid a great deal.

In the Atlanta game, they sent Sharper once. They play aggressive, but it's still Cover 2...

09-21-2007, 07:22 PM
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $10269900	I'm watching the Lions spread it out and pass ALL OVER the Vikings... But you can bet you're ass we won't do anything close to it...
Posts: 100,022

09-21-2007, 07:51 PM	#2
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $10269900	They just cut away to show Hester's TD return and then the announcer of the Vikes/Lions game made a comment about how much easier it was for the Bears to score now that they're playing the Chiefs. Jayice Pearson just laughed. He knows how bad the Chiefs suck...
Posts: 100,022

09-21-2007, 07:53 PM	#3
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4620478	I watched both of their games. Their LBs suck for a Cover 2 defense...but we won't take advantage of it. We're gonna pound Larry's dick into Casey Wiegmann's ass 40 times until Dustin Colquitt's leg falls off. And they are going to blitz the HELL out of us. We might see Brodie, because there's a very good chance Huard gets hurt. I'm predicting a loss. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 278,163

09-21-2007, 07:57 PM	#5
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4303447	This season has so far been a repeat of the 2006 season; I don't see why this won't be the same as the San Francisco game. 1st game -- Disappointing loss that was a perceived opportunity for victory. 2nd game -- Surprisingly close loss that was a perceived opportunity to get blown out. 3rd game -- Offense at home against iffy defense finally opens up and Chiefs roll big. It's entirely possible the Chiefs open up their offense and put up some points. And the Vikings LITERALLY have ONE weapon on offense. I'm predicting a win, even though I don't have those fancy press credentials and people don't pay to read my opinion.
Posts: 59,288

09-21-2007, 08:00 PM	#10
Buehler445 Supporter Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Scott City KS Casino cash: $2224734	I agree with htismaq. I posted it in another thread. I think in order to be successful, we need to pass the ball effectively (more than a pass in the flat to Wilson). I don't think LJ can pound it against 9 man fronts anymore. He just can't do it and win games. I honestly think Brodie with or without turnovers gives us the best chance to win the game. He is more mobile, he isn't scared to the point that he starts the throw to his checkdown before he finishes his drop, he throws the ball better, especially downfield, seems to be making better decisions, and most importantly CAN MOVE THE CHAINS. Huard isn't playing mistake free this year. I would rather watch Croyle take sacks and throw INTs than Huard. To compound that, 4 first downs and an INT gives the defense a lot more rest than a 3 and out.
Posts: 56,835