Chiefs Devil's advocate-Chiefs shouldn't have signed Cassel & should've waited & signed Vick

kcbubb · 07-28-2009, 10:44 AM

The Chiefs offense in the last 7 games of the year improved greatly and was performing in the top half the league using Gailey's modified spread offense. This offense used a running QB who threw primarily short, quick passes and the QB lead the league in rushing for his position.

This offense would have been perfect for Michael Vick, who led the league in QB rushing several times. Vick has never been a great passer or decision maker, but Gailey's offense which relied on easy decision making, mostly short passes and the QB running the ball would have fit Vick perfectly. And this offense is more suited to the Chiefs current offensive line which has and will struggle. The Chiefs could have allowed Thigpen and Vick to compete but obviously Thigpen would have the job for at least the first 6 games.

This would have also allowed the Chiefs to use their draft differently to fill many gaping holes and obvious lack of depth with the offensive line, linebacker, a pass rusher, TE and wide receiver.

The Chiefs could have stuck with the 4-3 and tried to overhaul their defense with Curry, Everette Brown or Ray Malaugua (Brown & Malaugua were both available in the 2nd round), or Michael Johnson (available in the 3rd round).

Or they could have mixed that in with trying to revamp their offensive line with the many players that were available or with a TE like Jared Cook who was available in the 3rd round who would have complimented our big TE, Cottam.

Instead we are stuck with watching a young QB play behind a weak offensive line and throw to receivers that drop many passes or can't stay healthy with out the best pass catching option from last year. And the only significant improvement to one of the worst defenses in the league was to the defensive line and a couple of old linebackers.

**Lzen** · 07-28-2009, 10:46 AM

Shut up, you!

88TG88 · 07-28-2009, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Vick has never been a great passer or decision maker,

Then why sign him ?

sedated · 07-28-2009, 10:49 AM

nice attempt, though.

**The Franchise** · 07-28-2009, 10:49 AM

Umm.....what?

Dumbest.

Thread.

Evar!!

**Bwana** · 07-28-2009, 10:49 AM

What the......

Bad Noob!

**Reaper16** · 07-28-2009, 10:50 AM

Man, the child-safety locks on playpins aren't shit these days.

FAX · 07-28-2009, 10:50 AM

Well ... there's a thought.

Vick could have made yardage with the Sloption, that's true. But, how were we to know that Vick would be available? I mean, before the draft and/or at the time we made the deal for Cassel?

FAX

kcbubb · 07-28-2009, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 88TG88

Then why sign him ?

Vick would have excelled in Gailey's offense. He's probably a better passer and runner than Thigpen. And Thiggy did pretty good in the offense.

Mr. Wizard · 07-28-2009, 10:51 AM

This thread sucks without pictures

http://www.abovethelaw.com/images/en...Law%20blog.jpg

Fish · 07-28-2009, 10:53 AM

Are you forgetting that the spread offense we ran... which Thigpen did well in... still only netted us 2 wins?

If we waited on Vick, we would have essentially wasted the season. The first (very important) season for the new GM, Coach, and coaching staff.....

Just Passin' By · 07-28-2009, 10:55 AM

WTF does Vick have to do with the 3-4 or 4-3 and any theoretical decision not to overhaul the defense? All Cassel cost the Chiefs was a second round pick, for crying out loud.

kcbubb · 07-28-2009, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX

Well ... there's a thought.

Vick could have made yardage with the Sloption, that's true. But, how were we to know that Vick would be available? I mean, before the draft and/or at the time we made the deal for Cassel?

FAX

you couldn't have known for sure, but I thought he was going to be around this year. And he will be cheap.

just look at last year from the Jets game to the end of the season. There are 10 games there. And if the Chiefs defense and QB play were a little better, they could probably have one at least five or six of those games.

If Vick could play a little better than Thigpen and the defense could have improved, we would be much better than we are right now.

Fish · 07-28-2009, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb

you couldn't have known for sure, but I thought he was going to be around this year. And he will be cheap.

just look at last year from the Jets game to the end of the season. There are 10 games there. And if the Chiefs defense and QB play were a little better, they could probably have one at least five or six of those games.

If Vick could play a little better than Thigpen and the defense could have improved, we would be much better than we are right now.

A few wins better? What good would that have done? Most of us want more than a few wins better.

Vick is not the answer. Not no way, not no how....

kcbubb · 07-28-2009, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

WTF does Vick have to do with the 3-4 or 4-3 and any theoretical decision not to overhaul the defense? All Cassel cost the Chiefs was a second round pick, for crying out loud.

Do you know what players were available with that 2nd pick???

07-28-2009, 10:44 AM
kcbubb Veteran Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $5156719	Devil's advocate-Chiefs shouldn't have signed Cassel & should've waited & signed Vick The Chiefs offense in the last 7 games of the year improved greatly and was performing in the top half the league using Gailey's modified spread offense. This offense used a running QB who threw primarily short, quick passes and the QB lead the league in rushing for his position. This offense would have been perfect for Michael Vick, who led the league in QB rushing several times. Vick has never been a great passer or decision maker, but Gailey's offense which relied on easy decision making, mostly short passes and the QB running the ball would have fit Vick perfectly. And this offense is more suited to the Chiefs current offensive line which has and will struggle. The Chiefs could have allowed Thigpen and Vick to compete but obviously Thigpen would have the job for at least the first 6 games. This would have also allowed the Chiefs to use their draft differently to fill many gaping holes and obvious lack of depth with the offensive line, linebacker, a pass rusher, TE and wide receiver. The Chiefs could have stuck with the 4-3 and tried to overhaul their defense with Curry, Everette Brown or Ray Malaugua (Brown & Malaugua were both available in the 2nd round), or Michael Johnson (available in the 3rd round). Or they could have mixed that in with trying to revamp their offensive line with the many players that were available or with a TE like Jared Cook who was available in the 3rd round who would have complimented our big TE, Cottam. Instead we are stuck with watching a young QB play behind a weak offensive line and throw to receivers that drop many passes or can't stay healthy with out the best pass catching option from last year. And the only significant improvement to one of the worst defenses in the league was to the defensive line and a couple of old linebackers.
Posts: 2,549

07-28-2009, 10:46 AM	#2
Lzen Banded Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Oz Casino cash: $-529308	Shut up, you! __________________ Conversation would be vastly improved by the constant use of four simple words: I do not know.
Posts: 42,458

07-28-2009, 10:49 AM	#5
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2085047	Umm.....what? Dumbest. Thread. Evar!!
Posts: 92,316

07-28-2009, 10:49 AM	#6
Bwana It's Five O'Clock Somewhere Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Billings, Montana Casino cash: $2136043647	What the...... Bad Noob! Attached Thumbnails __________________ Adventure is dangerous....but monotony can kill you.
Posts: 70,473

07-28-2009, 10:50 AM	#8
FAX testing ... 1, 2, 3 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Tennessee Casino cash: $6753759	Well ... there's a thought. Vick could have made yardage with the Sloption, that's true. But, how were we to know that Vick would be available? I mean, before the draft and/or at the time we made the deal for Cassel? FAX
Posts: 44,492

07-28-2009, 10:51 AM	#10
Mr. Wizard "I'm with you fellers" Join Date: Oct 2008 Casino cash: $3410446	This thread sucks without pictures http://www.abovethelaw.com/images/en...Law%20blog.jpg __________________ "I'm with you fellers"
Posts: 772

07-28-2009, 10:53 AM	#11
Fish Ain't no relax! Join Date: Sep 2005 Casino cash: $-1231081	Are you forgetting that the spread offense we ran... which Thigpen did well in... still only netted us 2 wins? If we waited on Vick, we would have essentially wasted the season. The first (very important) season for the new GM, Coach, and coaching staff..... __________________
Posts: 48,803

07-28-2009, 10:55 AM	#12
Just Passin' By In Search of a Life Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $5450524	WTF does Vick have to do with the 3-4 or 4-3 and any theoretical decision not to overhaul the defense? All Cassel cost the Chiefs was a second round pick, for crying out loud.
Posts: 69,748