Drafting for D

King_Chief_Fan · 04-22-2005, 07:04 AM

Is it really wise to put the d in the hands of the same people who have been evaluating talent, spouting we have good players, and making draft decisions on potential instead of results?

Simms drafted on potential -- hasn't proved poop just yet
Jr Siavai -- played very little college ball was the first choice of Chiefs and he has not shown much...yet. Imagine him being picked ahead of Allen.

I just think the evaluators might not know what the heck they are doing.

I am all for Gunther having the only say....Tell DV and CP to

and STFD.

**petegz28** · 04-22-2005, 07:07 AM

But our 2nd round pick is to valuabe to give away for Surtain.

jspchief · 04-22-2005, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan

Is it really wise to put the d in the hands of the same people who have been evaluating talent, spouting we have good players, and making draft decisions on potential instead of results?

Simms drafted on potential -- hasn't proved poop just yet
Jr Siavai -- played very little college ball was the first choice of Chiefs and he has not shown much...yet. Imagine him being picked ahead of Allen.

I just think the evaluators might not know what the heck they are doing.

I am all for Gunther having the only say....Tell DV and CP to

and STFD.

Petersom mentioned in an interview earlier this week that their most successful defensive draft picks have been Gunther's choices. Hopefully they remember that this weekend.

Cormac · 04-22-2005, 07:17 AM

I keep reading that Sims was drafted on potential. IIRC, he was said to be the most complete DT, and most ready to start of all the DTs in his draft. I think that's why he was brought in. For immediate performance.......

htismaqe · 04-22-2005, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cormac

I keep reading that Sims was drafted on potential. IIRC, he was said to be the most complete DT, and most ready to start of all the DTs in his draft. I think that's why he was brought in. For immediate performance.......

Yep. He was the "safe" pick. Well-rounded and ready, just not special.

keg in kc · 04-22-2005, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan

I am all for Gunther having the only say....

Name "William Bartee" ring a bell?

whoman69 · 04-22-2005, 07:45 AM

Somebody needs to tell them to

. Keg you can mention Bartee, but its not certain that pick came from Gunther. Check out the '97 draft when Cunningham came here as DC. I don't think its any coincidence that the number of reaches and tweeners increased when DV got here. He needs to have very little say in the type defensive players we get this year or we'll have another repeat.

04-22-2005, 07:04 AM
King_Chief_Fan Praise Him Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: none ya Casino cash: $4755486	Drafting for D Is it really wise to put the d in the hands of the same people who have been evaluating talent, spouting we have good players, and making draft decisions on potential instead of results? Simms drafted on potential -- hasn't proved poop just yet Jr Siavai -- played very little college ball was the first choice of Chiefs and he has not shown much...yet. Imagine him being picked ahead of Allen. I just think the evaluators might not know what the heck they are doing. I am all for Gunther having the only say....Tell DV and CP to and STFD.
Posts: 12,362

04-22-2005, 07:07 AM	#2
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-1115873	But our 2nd round pick is to valuabe to give away for Surtain.
Posts: 132,504

04-22-2005, 07:17 AM	#4
Cormac Haley sceptic.... Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: waiting it out....... Casino cash: $10004900	I keep reading that Sims was drafted on potential. IIRC, he was said to be the most complete DT, and most ready to start of all the DTs in his draft. I think that's why he was brought in. For immediate performance.......
Posts: 2,406