Chiefs Your opinion....Should the Chiefs move to a 3-4?

Mr. Kotter · 02-20-2009, 01:37 PM

Maybe I've missed it, and maybe it's a repost....but I'm gonna do it anyway.

I've heard and read the same rumors as everyone else...but still haven't gotten a sense of whether there is really a SERIOUS chance of it happening. My sense is, despite the rumors....that it's unlikely this year; I just don't see it. Maybe they'll head that way, but I can't see it for next year.

Thoughts??? I'm just interested in what others think/are hearing.

EyePod · 02-20-2009, 01:40 PM

This needs a poll so I can say no.

talastan · 02-20-2009, 01:41 PM

Meh....we're a couple of years away from being a complete football team IMO so we could afford to go either way. I'm fine with either scheme or a hybrid of both as long as we attack the QB and get aggresive whichever type of scheme we decide to run.

Mr. Kotter · 02-20-2009, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod

This needs a poll so I can say no.

I was gonna make it a poll, but forgot to hit the option...

**DeezNutz** · 02-20-2009, 01:47 PM

There's so much talent on this team defensively that there's almost no way you could justify the switch.

What would happen to Tamba? DJ?

kaplin42 · 02-20-2009, 01:47 PM

It's not like the defense can get much worse than last year. They can suck in a 4-3 or in a 3-4, really doesnt matter. But if they are gonna switch, this is the year to do it.

talastan · 02-20-2009, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

There's so much talent on this team defensively that there's almost no way you could justify the switch.

What would happen to Tamba? DJ?

DJ will do fine IMO, as for Tamba he is becoming more and more of a bust IMO. He defintely hasn't played up to expectations of his draft pick.

He'd probably be a rotational player in a 3-4.

BigChiefFan · 02-20-2009, 01:50 PM

In the long run, we will be better served.

King_Chief_Fan · 02-20-2009, 01:51 PM

Well, reflecting on Haley comments, he builds around the players he has. He doesn't have the players for 3-4 (unless he gets froggy in FA and the draft), so I say, it is not likely but they might try it in certain situations.

Mr. Kotter · 02-20-2009, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan

In the long run, we will be better served.

Why do you think that?

I'm serious; not being critical. Aren't 3-4 personnel more difficult to come-by?

beach tribe · 02-20-2009, 01:52 PM

I think we should use both.

Mr. Kotter · 02-20-2009, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

There's so much talent on this team defensively that there's almost no way you could justify the switch.

What would happen to Tamba? DJ?

See, THAT is the problem I see.....we have some talented, if unspectacular, players who would not thrive in a 3-4, and might actually whither on the bench if we make the switch.

beach tribe · 02-20-2009, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

Why do you think that?

I'm serious; not being critical. Aren't 3-4 personnel more difficult to come-by?

Only the nose tackle. Everything else is easier to find.

**DeezNutz** · 02-20-2009, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by talastan

DJ will do fine IMO, as for Tamba he is becoming more and more of a bust IMO. He defintely hasn't played up to expectations of his draft pick.

He'd probably be a rotational player in a 3-4.

I'd say Tamba has played up to expectations. He was a high motor guy who was pretty polished coming out. It wasn't a great selection.

There's not much to say about DJ. He's been very disappointing and has demonstrated why he was available at #15.

Obviously, I was joking. The roster is short on talent.

**DeezNutz** · 02-20-2009, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

See, THAT is the problem I see.....we have some talented, if unspectacular, players who would not thrive in a 3-4, and might actually whither on the bench if we make the switch.

I was being a smartass, as usual.

On paper, it doesn't look like the switch would fit much of the personnel. With that said, 10 ****ing sacks, 10 ****ing sacks (coupled with how many 300 yard rushing games?), suggest that these same players don't exactly thrive in the 4-3.

Carpet bomb this piece of shit and put it back together correctly.

02-20-2009, 01:37 PM
Mr. Kotter Self Ban Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: In some's minds... Casino cash: $3194285	Your opinion....Should the Chiefs move to a 3-4? Maybe I've missed it, and maybe it's a repost....but I'm gonna do it anyway. I've heard and read the same rumors as everyone else...but still haven't gotten a sense of whether there is really a SERIOUS chance of it happening. My sense is, despite the rumors....that it's unlikely this year; I just don't see it. Maybe they'll head that way, but I can't see it for next year. Thoughts??? I'm just interested in what others think/are hearing.
Posts: 46,966

02-20-2009, 01:40 PM	#2
EyePod Forgetting 2013 season end. Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Around Casino cash: $9995735	This needs a poll so I can say no. __________________ I did not believe in Mahomes until week 1. I've been woke ever since. I'm on board this freight train.
Posts: 5,800

02-20-2009, 01:41 PM	#3
talastan Manning, we're coming for you! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Springfield, Mo Casino cash: $10004950	Meh....we're a couple of years away from being a complete football team IMO so we could afford to go either way. I'm fine with either scheme or a hybrid of both as long as we attack the QB and get aggresive whichever type of scheme we decide to run. __________________ Can we please just draft AND DEVELOP a QB - est. since 1983 Check out my band: Truett and the Traitors
Posts: 4,815

02-20-2009, 01:47 PM	#6
kaplin42 Thats Right, Sniff the Glue!!! Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: tubbytronic superdome Casino cash: $10007177	It's not like the defense can get much worse than last year. They can suck in a 4-3 or in a 3-4, really doesnt matter. But if they are gonna switch, this is the year to do it.
Posts: 3,469

02-20-2009, 01:50 PM	#8
BigChiefFan MVP Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: In the Top 10 Casino cash: $9924205	In the long run, we will be better served. __________________ A 35 year drought can make you thirsty.
Posts: 15,777

02-20-2009, 01:51 PM	#9
King_Chief_Fan Praise Him Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: none ya Casino cash: $4755486	Well, reflecting on Haley comments, he builds around the players he has. He doesn't have the players for 3-4 (unless he gets froggy in FA and the draft), so I say, it is not likely but they might try it in certain situations.
Posts: 12,362

02-20-2009, 01:52 PM	#11
beach tribe Keep doubting J MFing Houston Join Date: May 2007 Location: ft.lauderdale Casino cash: $3878036	I think we should use both.
Posts: 21,429