Chiefs Why not Brandon Marshall.

CrazyHorse · 03-09-2010, 08:54 AM

If you want a no brainer slam dunk 1st round talent, who better than Marshall? It's not like we dont have the cap room to sign him to a deal Denver couldn't match. All we would have to do is out bid Seattle. Like the Ravens did us for Boldin.

Yeah the #5 is a high pick that you dont want to give to a division rival. But they are likely to get it from somewhere else.

At least we know we wouldn't be "missing" on our 1st rounder for a change. That would be nice. Not to mention, you would get an immediate return on investment instead of the developmental cyrve we would have to go through with a rook.

Just a thought.

tymania · 03-09-2010, 09:01 AM

F all that.. dont want to give the Donkeys a top 5 pick.. maybe if we could trade down and then trade our 1st round pick.. either way i think we need our first pick to fill other holes on the squad

MOhillbilly · 03-09-2010, 09:04 AM

Garcia Bronco · 03-09-2010, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tymania

F all that.. dont want to give the Donkeys a top 5 pick.. maybe if we could trade down and then trade our 1st round pick.. either way i think we need our first pick to fill other holes on the squad

You guys will waste that top pick like you do every year when you draft about right there.

**morphius** · 03-09-2010, 09:02 AM

I think he has proven to be enough of a head case that there is no way our coaching staff touches him, and only a team that believes they are a WR short would.

thecoffeeguy · 03-09-2010, 09:02 AM

He is a head case.

**DeezNutz** · 03-09-2010, 09:02 AM

I'm a big fan of Marshall. Special talent.

That said, no chance I'd trade #5 overall if Clausen and Berry are on the board. Would I rather take Marshall than Tyson Jackson (I or II)? Every single day.

But I'd rather draft Clausen, and package our high 2nd, plus Cassel to Denver for Marshall in return.

Crush · 03-09-2010, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

I'm a big fan of Marshall. Special talent.

That said, no chance I'd trade #5 overall if Clausen and Berry are on the board. Would I rather take Marshall than Tyson Jackson (I or II)? Every single day.

But I'd rather draft Clausen, and package our high 2nd, plus Cassel to Denver for Marshall in return.

McDaniels is stupid enough to do it. To the milk truck!!!

Hog's Gone Fishin · 03-09-2010, 09:04 AM

CoMoChief · 03-09-2010, 09:09 AM

You make a trade like this if you're needing that one player to take you over the hump to make your team a legit SB contender.

The Chiefs have way too many holes to be giving up prime draft picks. Maybe in a couple years I'd make a trade like this. But we need a player like safety Eric Berry. I thought we would do better in FA than what we've been doing. With Haley ties in ARZ, I would have thought we'd go after Dansby hard. Maybe he did, and just wanted to play in MIA instead I dunno.

But Marshall is worth a top 5 pick? Probably, he's a top WR in this league. Are we in a position to sacrafice the 5th overall pick......probably not.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 03-09-2010, 09:13 AM

Why not?

Because this organization values nice guys with marginal talent over talented guys that aren't boy scouts.

I wouldn't trade our 1st round pick for him, but I'd definitely package Cassel and a pick for him.

Eh, what am I thinking? We have Chris Chambers. We're set at WR.

MOhillbilly · 03-09-2010, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I wouldn't trade our 1st round pick for him, but I'd definitely package Cassel and a pick for him.

crazy talk.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 03-09-2010, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Why not?

Because this organization values nice guys with marginal talent over talented guys that aren't boy scouts.

I wouldn't trade our 1st round pick for him, but I'd definitely package Cassel and a pick for him.

Eh, what am I thinking? We have Chris Chambers. We're set at WR.

Ouch. That's some painful truth, Kimosabbe!

Hootie · 03-09-2010, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Why not?

Because this organization values nice guys with marginal talent over talented guys that aren't boy scouts.

I wouldn't trade our 1st round pick for him, but I'd definitely package Cassel and a pick for him.

Eh, what am I thinking? We have Chris Chambers. We're set at WR.

I think the Broncos are over Matt Cassel.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 03-09-2010, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

I think the Broncos are over Matt Cassel.

After seeing him play last year, you can understand why.

Trust me, I know that even mentioning trading Cassel is a ****ing dream scenario. Pioli won't admit his mistake.

03-09-2010, 08:54 AM	Topic Starter
CrazyHorse All Motor! Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Why not Brandon Marshall. If you want a no brainer slam dunk 1st round talent, who better than Marshall? It's not like we dont have the cap room to sign him to a deal Denver couldn't match. All we would have to do is out bid Seattle. Like the Ravens did us for Boldin. Yeah the #5 is a high pick that you dont want to give to a division rival. But they are likely to get it from somewhere else. At least we know we wouldn't be "missing" on our 1st rounder for a change. That would be nice. Not to mention, you would get an immediate return on investment instead of the developmental cyrve we would have to go through with a rook. Just a thought.
Posts: 2,118

03-09-2010, 09:01 AM	#2
tymania Love it or Leave it USA#1 Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Council Bluffs, Iowa Casino cash: $10004900	F all that.. dont want to give the Donkeys a top 5 pick.. maybe if we could trade down and then trade our 1st round pick.. either way i think we need our first pick to fill other holes on the squad
Posts: 813

03-09-2010, 09:04 AM	#3
MOhillbilly Mama Tried Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Missouri Casino cash: $9949903	wut? __________________ True Son of Liberty
Posts: 23,371

03-09-2010, 09:02 AM	#6
thecoffeeguy That Rascally wabbit! Join Date: Aug 2009 Casino cash: $10001564	He is a head case.
Posts: 1,565

03-09-2010, 09:04 AM	#9
Hog's Gone Fishin Fish are scared of me Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $-1539523	Pass
Posts: 40,649

03-09-2010, 09:02 AM	#5
morphius World's finest morphius Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $5735027	I think he has proven to be enough of a head case that there is no way our coaching staff touches him, and only a team that believes they are a WR short would.
Posts: 26,023

03-09-2010, 09:09 AM	#10
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $7672254	You make a trade like this if you're needing that one player to take you over the hump to make your team a legit SB contender. The Chiefs have way too many holes to be giving up prime draft picks. Maybe in a couple years I'd make a trade like this. But we need a player like safety Eric Berry. I thought we would do better in FA than what we've been doing. With Haley ties in ARZ, I would have thought we'd go after Dansby hard. Maybe he did, and just wanted to play in MIA instead I dunno. But Marshall is worth a top 5 pick? Probably, he's a top WR in this league. Are we in a position to sacrafice the 5th overall pick......probably not.
Posts: 39,245

03-09-2010, 09:13 AM	#11
OnTheWarpath15 MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Casino cash: $2051115	Why not? Because this organization values nice guys with marginal talent over talented guys that aren't boy scouts. I wouldn't trade our 1st round pick for him, but I'd definitely package Cassel and a pick for him. Eh, what am I thinking? We have Chris Chambers. We're set at WR.
Posts: 60,758