Chiefs Should they have called this unnecessary roughness

-King- · 12-08-2019, 11:25 PM

They would call this if it was on Brady #KCvsNE pic.twitter.com/Ml8caUNpxG
— Koro (@nonsmoknlifboat) December 8, 2019

This is an argument I'm having in another thread. Supposedly this hit should have been flagged because Mahomes was heading out of bounds even though he asnt officially out of bounds yet. IMO, there's no way this should be flagged. A player in bounds is a player in bounds and can get hit. As much as I'd love for Mahomes to be protected, objectively there's no way they should call a penalty here.

Also it's weird how people hate the refs but want to add even more subjectivity to how they rule. So now they have to guess if a player is clearly going out of bounds on not? Makes no sense to me but hey...I'm CPs chief contrarian so I may be way off...

eDave · 12-08-2019, 11:26 PM

There should have been a brawl after that. Defend your guy, linemen.

KC_Connection · 12-08-2019, 11:27 PM

I've never seen a hit like this not called unnecessary roughness on an elite QB. And I can guarantee that if Mahomes was playing a different team in a different context, it absolutely would have been.

LiL stumppy · 12-09-2019, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

I've never seen a hit like this not called unnecessary roughness on an elite QB. And I can guarantee that if Mahomes was playing a different team in a different context, it absolutely would have been.

These are comments that are so ignorant. No, it wouldn’t have been called simply if he played for a different team and it wasn’t missed because the NFL has some vandeta against the Chiefs. It was a close, missed call. That’s all it is.

The Chiefs were handed this game by the refs, yet people still think the Patriots get all the love. It’s getting Ridiculous

burt · 12-09-2019, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiL stumppy

it wasn’t missed because the NFL has some vandeta against the Chiefs.

No...refs have been terrible for at least 2 years. NOT a vendetta against the Chiefs...they are just bad. Even when they can correct a call through a coaches challenge or mandated instant replay...they don't. The NFL must address this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiL stumppy

The Chiefs were handed this game by the refs,

I agree. BUT....there were so many bad calls. BOTH ways. so. very. bad.

crayzkirk · 12-09-2019, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

I've never seen a hit like this not called unnecessary roughness on an elite QB. And I can guarantee that if Mahomes was playing a different team in a different context, it absolutely would have been.

Last year, Justin Houston hit Andrew Luck much later than this out of bounds in the playoff game. There was no flag and there really could have been one.

These guys aren't playing checkers and at some point, quarterbacks are going to need to start being treated like other runners.

Was it cheap? Yes. Was Mahomes still inbounds? Yes.

To me, it's the selective enforcement based on whom is being hit and whom is doing the hitting that's the problem.

Rasputin · 12-08-2019, 11:27 PM

It would have been called against Tom Brady.

-King- · 12-08-2019, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

It would have been called against Tom Brady.

So, it should or shouldn't be called a penalty?

-King- · 12-08-2019, 11:27 PM

Messed up on the 3rd poll choice, I really am a dumbass

. Should be "No it's not a penalty..."

KS Smitty · 12-08-2019, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Messed up on the 3rd poll choice, I really am a dumbass

. Should be "No it's not a penalty..."

Yes you are.

**DaFace** · 12-08-2019, 11:28 PM

Should it be? No. Do they often call that? Absolutely.

-King- · 12-08-2019, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

Should it be? No. Do they often call that? Absolutely.

Can you fix the 3rd poll choice?

BWillie · 12-09-2019, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

Should it be? No. Do they often call that? Absolutely.

This is the correct answer. No sure why it should be a penalty to push a guy while he's still in bounds.

KS Smitty · 12-08-2019, 11:30 PM

Imon Yourside · 12-08-2019, 11:30 PM

meant to vote the ORIGINAL #3 but happy with 1 now that the poll changed.

View Poll Results: Should this be a penalty
Yes it's a penalty	117	80.69%
No it's not a penalty	18	12.41%
No it's not a penalty but -King- is still a dumbass	10	6.90%
Voters: 145. You may not vote on this poll

12-08-2019, 11:25 PM	Topic Starter
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $2205743	Should they have called this unnecessary roughness They would call this if it was on Brady #KCvsNE pic.twitter.com/Ml8caUNpxG — Koro (@nonsmoknlifboat) December 8, 2019 This is an argument I'm having in another thread. Supposedly this hit should have been flagged because Mahomes was heading out of bounds even though he asnt officially out of bounds yet. IMO, there's no way this should be flagged. A player in bounds is a player in bounds and can get hit. As much as I'd love for Mahomes to be protected, objectively there's no way they should call a penalty here. Also it's weird how people hate the refs but want to add even more subjectivity to how they rule. So now they have to guess if a player is clearly going out of bounds on not? Makes no sense to me but hey...I'm CPs chief contrarian so I may be way off...
Posts: 63,910

12-08-2019, 11:26 PM	#2
eDave Banned Join Date: Jan 2013 Casino cash: $9998560	There should have been a brawl after that. Defend your guy, linemen.
Posts: 53,803	12 0

12-08-2019, 11:27 PM	#7
Rasputin Tip of the hat LIV Champs Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: ks Casino cash: $3245421	It would have been called against Tom Brady.
Posts: 54,981	11 0

12-08-2019, 11:27 PM	#9
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $2205743	Messed up on the 3rd poll choice, I really am a dumbass . Should be "No it's not a penalty..." __________________ 🏁
Posts: 63,910	1 0

12-08-2019, 11:27 PM	#3
KC_Connection Perpetual Mediocrity Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $5102783	I've never seen a hit like this not called unnecessary roughness on an elite QB. And I can guarantee that if Mahomes was playing a different team in a different context, it absolutely would have been.
Posts: 49,249	19 0

12-08-2019, 11:28 PM	#11
DaFace Kind of a mod Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Donkey Land Casino cash: $1746899	Should it be? No. Do they often call that? Absolutely.
Posts: 51,964	4 1

12-08-2019, 11:30 PM	#14
KS Smitty Cool as a Cucumber Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: on the edge Casino cash: $3666717	Yes. __________________ A D with Sneed is a D indeed.
Posts: 3,822

12-08-2019, 11:30 PM	#15
Imon Yourside WhatUneed2Hear Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: AllSoulsMatter Casino cash: $2393181	meant to vote the ORIGINAL #3 but happy with 1 now that the poll changed. __________________ "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour" Peter 5:8 "Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter's clay" Isaiah 29:16 "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." Revelation 3:20 Last edited by Imon Yourside; 12-09-2019 at 12:50 AM..
Posts: 44,392