|
![]() |
#31 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
Quote:
For his entire career at Pitt, Donald was the only guy that opposing teams had to game plan for on that defense. Yet he still had production that was beyond the scope of anyone else in college football. 28.5 tackles for losses in a season is just ridiculous. He's one of the most productive, if not the most, DTs at the college level in recent history and ran a 4.6 at the combine at 285 pounds. His arms are longer than Timmy Jernigan's and Will Sutton's arms and they're also longer than Geno Atkins' arms. Dominique Easley, the guy in this draft that is often compared to Donald, isn't even close to Donald in terms of production and he played on defenses where he had plenty of help around him. |
|
Posts: 12,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $-785936
|
Quote:
The NFL isn't stacked with great offensive line play. Plus, the guy is so athletic and strong, that it won't matter if he's outweighed. Destroyed by NFL lineman? Nah. Teams are in the nickel more now than they are in the base set anyway. |
|
Posts: 84,266
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
Casino cash: $-1340000
|
We shall see about Aaron Donald. The strength of NFL guards is certainly cause for alarm. We're talking about guys that can pick Donald up and toss him aside like a rag doll, something he sure as **** didn't see in college very often. Donald will have to play a flawless brand of football in terms of keeping a very low base. He'll have to be in a gap shooting scheme made to maximize his quick first step and help offset his severe lack of weight. He could see solid production in a 4-3 as an UT. He certainly is a good football player, but that doesn't always transfer to the pros.
|
Posts: 14,143
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $-785936
|
You guys act as if NFL guards are the boogey man compared to NCAA level guards.
|
Posts: 84,266
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
Casino cash: $-1340000
|
Quote:
Is there a better than average chance Donald will become a good NFL player? I think so, I think his physical abilities are difficult to block in my experience. As a bigger player, it is difficult to move as fast as Donald at the snap which makes it more difficult to gain the leverage necessary to move him. However, NFL guards will get leverage and the results will not be good when they do. Like I said, Donald will have to be put in the right scheme where he can use his athleticism to win the point of attack and disrupt the backfield. He's going to be able to do that as an under tackle in a 4-3 where he's playing the 3-technique primarily against slower players. That is the whole key because he will not be able to overcome the strength of NFL guards, it just is not going to happen. He has to beat them athletically, and that he is more than capable of. He isn't going to line up on tackles and beat them in a 3-4 in my opinion. They are too in tune with smaller, faster, lineman and more ideally equipped to shut them down, so this dream some are having of him lining up as a defensive end in an odd front is laughable to me. Put him where he belongs, and there is a solid chance he's successful. |
|
Posts: 14,143
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $-785936
|
Quote:
Is there this great canyon of ability between the two? No. The NFL is all about leverage, which is something that Donald absolutely excels at. He's stronger and faster, more athletic than 90% of NFL guards. They'll have pounds on him sure, but that doesn't really translate to anything. I think hes talented enough to play the 34 end, but it would be a waste because he'd be dominant playing inside. It's also why id take him here in KC as we aren't sitting our DE's outside consistently. |
|
Posts: 84,266
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|