USA Today: Ranking the decision makers: Who is best at the NFL draft?

[Amnorix]

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

So, having established that he ****ed up on Cassel, would it be even more of a **** up to not address the most important position on the team, and to extend that even further, mortgage the future by making selections to try and cover up the fact that you ****ed up in the first place?

Your post makes no sense on several levels.

First, it hasn't been determined that Cassell is a f'up.

Second, are you saying that a good QB doesn't need talent around him? You only need talent on offense if your QB sucks. So if you draft good offensive players you can't actually use them when you get a good QB?

Does that make any frickin' sense at all?