|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2016
Casino cash: $-699600
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 17,559
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Old, not Dead
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Where the Buffalo Roam...
Casino cash: $9160400
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 817
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2016
Casino cash: $-699600
|
Quote:
Their turnover issues have defied the odds. I don't see how anybody could expect that to continue. The offense had moved the ball as well as ever until a bump in the road Sunday. Even if the defense struggles all year, that's no different than 2018. |
|
Posts: 17,559
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Out Gunning CP's Fandom Police
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Galveston, TX
Casino cash: $-1496873
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Do we have time to run WASP?" |
|
Posts: 37,114
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2016
Casino cash: $-699600
|
Quote:
It's a little different when you're talking about 4 TOs to 0, or a fumble when you're already in position for a game-winning FG. |
|
Posts: 17,559
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Out Gunning CP's Fandom Police
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Galveston, TX
Casino cash: $-1496873
|
Absolutely, it was the timing of it. Cleveland was marching down the field going to go up by double digits again. And they fumbled. So yes, that was a big factor in why the Chiefs won that game. Had they gone down by double digits again, I bet the chances were very slim the Chiefs could have come back from that. That's the thing, everybody is so quick to say because of the turnovers this and that, but again, it goes both ways.
__________________
"Do we have time to run WASP?" |
Posts: 37,114
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2016
Casino cash: $-699600
|
Quote:
But if you want to say KC "should" be 4-3, fine. 4-3 vs one of the toughest schedules isn't what bad teams do. Yeah, they looked pretty bad on Sunday, but Tampa looked even worse in week 9 last year. Even a loaded roster can look like dogshit at times. I think they've looked like a contender in 5 of the 7 games. Having a turnstile LT is a worry, but I still think they'll get back to scoring a lot of points, and I think we'll see incremental improvement by the D. I don't agree with the people saying that Spags has lost the players. We've seen a huge improvement (and quality D, actually) in the 2nd half of the last three games. I think you have to look at it this way: What's the most likely outcome for each player or position group? Is it likely that Chris Jones continues to be a non-factor? I'd say no. Is it likely that the offense continues to turn the ball over at a high rate? No. Is it likely that Clark is completely worthless all year? Debatable, but I'd say no. He's had stretches like this before, but I think he's bound to give us a little more. I think the likeliest scenario is that the turnovers go way down, and we have a team that is highly efficient and high-scoring offensively, with a defense that can't stop a good offense (but is able to get a few more stops than we've seen thus far). That's a team that can still win a lot of games and possibly make a run. |
|
Posts: 17,559
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
Casino cash: $-1435090
|
Quote:
And then go back to loafing on defense. I think Spags has lost the defense. I don't think it's necessarily his fault, but I don't see Clark, Jones, or Reed suddenly deciding to go all out every play the rest of the season. They got paid, Two of them got their rings. |
|
Posts: 19,477
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2016
Casino cash: $-699600
|
Quote:
It'll be interesting to see the response. They've never been in this circumstance. They took some criticism after the Buffalo loss, but very few people were actually calling them a bad team or declaring their season over. They're getting a lot of disrespect right now and I'm sure they're aware of it. |
|
Posts: 17,559
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
Casino cash: $-1435090
|
Quote:
SEE? WE'RE STILL GREAT! And then we'll lose to The Cowboys, and The Packers, and The Bengals, and probably the Raiders twice, and to the Chargers again. Because we're spending a quarter of our cap on the defensive line, which is soft, overpaid, and loafing. |
|
Posts: 19,477
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $740478
|
Quote:
__________________
Chiefs game films |
|
Posts: 297,591
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Out Gunning CP's Fandom Police
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Galveston, TX
Casino cash: $-1496873
|
You can't realistically believe that.
__________________
"Do we have time to run WASP?" |
Posts: 37,114
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $740478
|
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 297,591
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Would an idiot do that?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Arizona
Casino cash: $-1135069
![]() |
Quote:
Also interested to see the Packers/Cardinals, because the Packers' offense hasn't been the juggernaut that this thread would indicate. At least the Cowboys' offense has performed well against garbage teams... the Pack have been pretty mediocre across the board. And that's not to say the Chiefs can beat either team right now regardless of whether they're SB contenders or pretenders... it's tough for me to pick 10+ wins at this point. |
|
Posts: 59,656
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|