Things I think it's time for:

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

The post-Hill rationalization was being deeper at WR was better than having one generational superstar WR.

We shall see how that turns out as the season progresses.

It all depends on the math.

Let's quantify it a little bit. Let's say we see players as being 'worth' 1-10.

We had a WR room of Hill, Robinson, Pringle, Hardman, Fountain. The idea was that Hill (10), Pringle (5), Hardman (5), Robinson (3), Fountain (3) (Grand total 26) could be outnumbered by a higher average.

So you figure JJSS (7), MVS (6), A developing Hardman (6), Moore (5), Watson (4) gets you a better total overall at 28. And it does so cheaper and with the addition of significant draft capital from the Hill trade.

The problem is that to this point JJSS and MVS haven't been 7/6 respectively, Hardman hasn't seemed to develop much and Moore has an N/A next to his name. Watson's the only guy who's met or exceeded the thresholds needed for the 'depth' experiment to work.

I think it's a decent plan but so far the execution hasn't gone to script.