Mock Me, Mock Me Hard!!!

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Woodson's throwing motion was the same in October as it was in April. Nothing changed.

Everyone knew that Brohm was injury prone in October, just like they did in April. Nothing changed.

Sorry, you have to do better than this.

Are you just upset that Croyle blows?

I knew your post would somehow infer that we shouldn't be drafting a QB though since that's your stance.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by Mecca

we shouldn't be drafting a QB though since that's your stance.

I must have missed this. Given our current situation, why would any Chiefs fan hold this position?

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

I must have missed this. Given our current situation, why would any Chiefs fan hold this position?

Dude it's coming, it'll become more pronounced as the draft approaches there is a faction of posters which OTW is a part of that think drafting a QB with the top pick unless he's Manning or Elway reincarnated in other words a perfect prospect they aren't worth it and will "cripple your franchise"

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Dude it's coming, it'll become more pronounced as the draft approaches there is a faction of posters which OTW is a part of that think drafting a QB with the top pick unless he's Manning or Elway reincarnated in other words a perfect prospect they aren't worth it and will "cripple your franchise"

Wow, that's about as blatant a lie as you might find here.

There's a HUGE difference in what you just posted, and my ACTUAL position, which is that I don't believe in taking a QB just for the sake of taking one.

I'm not of the opinion you pass up 15 better players to take a QB just because you need one, especially when you're not even sold on the QB you're taking.

Apparently people have already forgotten the Vermeil era, where it was common place to reach badly for players based on need alone.

That worked out well...

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Are you just upset that Croyle blows?

I knew your post would somehow infer that we shouldn't be drafting a QB though since that's your stance.

No, that's not my stance at all, you just choose to blow right over it EVERY ****ing time it comes up.

Your attitude towards taking a QB with a Top 5 pick has become cartoonish.

This time last year, you were up in arms that if we had a chance to take Brohm and we didn't, well, you'd turn in your fan card. Last straw, I believe you said.

Well....we did, and we didn't.

And it turns out that Brohm is so ****ing phenomenal he can't beat out a 7th round pick for a backup job.

It's the same song and dance this year with Stafford.

"He's got all the physical attributes you look for"

"He can make all the throws"

Blah, blah and blah.

Same shit, different guy.

I'm all for taking a QB, provided he's worth the value of that pick at the time.

Forgive me for not genuflecting at the Altar of Stafford 6 months before the draft, when he hasn't looked that impressive to begin with this year.

This team has WAY too many holes to put in stone, six months before the draft, that we MUST take a QB in R1, or else. That's ****ing reeruned.

[ILChief]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

No, that's not my stance at all, you just choose to blow right over it EVERY ****ing time it comes up.

Your attitude towards taking a QB with a Top 5 pick has become cartoonish.

This time last year, you were up in arms that if we had a chance to take Brohm and we didn't, well, you'd turn in your fan card. Last straw, I believe you said.

Well....we did, and we didn't.

And it turns out that Brohm is so ****ing phenomenal he can't beat out a 7th round pick for a backup job.

It's the same song and dance this year with Stafford.

"He's got all the physical attributes you look for"

"He can make all the throws"

Blah, blah and blah.

Same shit, different guy.

I'm all for taking a QB, provided he's worth the value of that pick at the time.

Forgive me for not genuflecting at the Altar of Stafford 6 months before the draft, when he hasn't looked that impressive to begin with this year.

This team has WAY too many holes to put in stone, six months before the draft, that we MUST take a QB in R1, or else. That's ****ing reeruned.

Stafford has looked very impressive.

NAME	CMP	ATT	YDS	CMP%	YDS/A	TD	INT	RAT
Matthew Stafford	86	144	1193	59.7	8.29	7	1	144.0

I don't know what more you could want from him. 60% completion and a 7-1 TD/INT ratio and a 144 Rating.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by ILChief

Stafford has looked very impressive.



I don't know what more you could want from him. 60% completion and a 7-1 TD/INT ratio and a 144 Rating.

And he has absolute shit WR's to work with and has to routinely make NFL throws.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by ILChief

Stafford has looked very impressive.



I don't know what more you could want from him. 60% completion and a 7-1 TD/INT ratio and a 144 Rating.

He could do more in big games, against good teams to start.

Sure, he's got great stats against Georgia Southern and Central Michigan, then is back under 60% against decent defenses.

SC made him look pretty average, and he picked up a ton of numbers in the 2nd half of that ass-whooping Alabama laid on them...31-0 at half.

I'm NOT saying he sucks, but I'd sure like to see him play another 3 months before I declare him a cant-miss NFL QB, just because we happen to need one...