Why does everyone keep saying we don't need a Tackle at #3?

[orange]

Originally Posted by Mecca

LOL, you don't have any interest in the Chiefs being good so cmon now.

Strangely enough, I do. They've been my #2 team from back in AFL days.

But let's say you're right and I wish them ill...

Your scenario still doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't I prefer them to draft Sanchez - which I've said would be a mistake - then have him suck so I can laugh at you guys and say "I told you so" for the next three years?

As it is, if the Chiefs draft Curry, I have to hope he works out so I don't have egg on my face.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by orange

Strangely enough, I do. They've been my #2 team from back in AFL days.

But let's say you're right and I wish them ill...

Your scenario still doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't I prefer them to draft Sanchez - which I've said would be a mistake - then have him suck so I can laugh at you guys and say "I told you so" for the next three years?

Ok let me ask you this question..

Why would you draft Curry 3 when that pick would mean you'd have to pay him more than you could get Dansby for in FA, hell if you take Curry 3 you might be able to get Dansby and Leroy Hill cheaper combined.

[orange]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ok let me ask you this question..

Why would you draft Curry 3 when that pick would mean you'd have to pay him more than you could get Dansby for in FA, hell if you take Curry 3 you might be able to get Dansby and Leroy Hill cheaper combined.

First, I'm not that high on Curry personally, but he IS the one guy everyone says is a can't miss prospect in this draft, so like I said above a couple pages, it wouldn't surprise me to see the Chiefs draft him.

Second, I don't think Dansby gets past the Broncos.

[edit] to save you having to dig back, I think the Chiefs will (and should*) take a DL.

*unless Stafford is there, but I don't see any way that happens.

[Ebolapox]

Originally Posted by orange

First, I'm not that high on Curry personally, but he IS the one guy everyone says is a can't miss prospect in this draft, so like I said above a couple pages, it wouldn't surprise me to see the Chiefs draft him.

Second, I don't think Dansby gets past the Broncos.

[edit] to save you having to dig back, I think the Chiefs will (and should*) take a DL.

*unless Stafford is there, but I don't see any way that happens.

THERE.IS.NO.SUCH.THING.AS.A.CAN'T.MISS.PROSPECT.IN.ANY.****ING.DRAFT.

funny slightly related/pointless anecdote? I remember when I was younger and I collected football cards hardcore. in the 1997 press pass football set there was in insert (with varying odds of pulling the cards)... it had six cards in the collection. they were cards of yatil green, warrick dunn, orlando pace, jim druckenmiller, peter bouleware and rae carruth. the 'can't miss' prospects of the 1997 draft. of all of those guys, you have a convicted murderer, an abject injury bust, a solid RB (but not all-world 'can't miss!'), a solid OLB/de (bouleware was never the feared sack-master you want in the top five), a qb who sucked (druckenmiller never lived up to the hype), and ONE guy who lived up to the billing (if you ignore his injury issues for the last several years)... orlando pace.

so the lesson? can't miss doesn't exist. there is no such thing as a safe pick. I don't want safe. I want the pick that will net us a lombardi or two my lifetime.

BTW: you can't truly be a broncos AND chiefs' fan. wtf is this 'second team' bullshit? pick one team and go with it.

[orange]

Mecca:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ok let me ask you this question..

Why would you draft Curry 3 when that pick would mean you'd have to pay him more than you could get Dansby for in FA, hell if you take Curry 3 you might be able to get Dansby and Leroy Hill cheaper combined.

Originally Posted by orange

Second, I don't think Dansby gets past the Broncos.

It doesn't look like Dansby's going anywhere after all.

Arizona is expected to make Dansby its franchise player by Wednesday, meaning QB Kurt Warner will not receive the tag and can test the free-agent market if he doesn’t re-sign with the team before then... Ordinarily, the franchise tag entitles a player to earn the average of the five highest-paid players at his position or 20 percent more than last year’s salary — whichever is greater. The 20 percent rule for Dansby is greater, meaning his franchise tag with Arizona will be worth a cool $9.6 million. But it also will limit Dansby from signing with another team. http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/02/16/card...ise-lb-dansby/

In any case - do you think the third pick will cost more than $9.6 million/year?