Curry

[Mecca]

Mel Kiper basically think Curry is going to be Keith Bulluck which well means he's a bad fit for a 3-4.

[bdeg]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Mel Kiper basically think Curry is going to be Keith Bulluck which well means he's a bad fit for a 3-4.

Care to elaborate on this? why couldn't Bulluck play in a 34

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by bdeg

Care to elaborate on this? why couldn't Bulluck play in a 34

As an inside backer sure...outside backer not so much.

Guys like Bulluck are nice pieces to have but would you use a top 5 pick on the guy?

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by Mecca

As an inside backer sure...outside backer not so much.

Guys like Bulluck are nice pieces to have but would you use a top 5 pick on the guy?

This explained in no way, shape or form how Bullock is a bad fit in the 3-4. Ok now explain why he is a bad fit in the 3-4.

[philfree]

So at 6' 242 lbs James Harrison can play ROLB and learn to rush the passer as his career progresses but a guy like Curry can't? Harrison doesn't have alot of pass rush moves either but he had how many sacks the last two years compared to his first years in the league? 8.5 in 2007 and 16 in 2008. Before that he had 4 sacks in 3 years.

PhilFree

[Reaper16]

Originally Posted by philfree

So at 6' 242 lbs James Harrison can play ROLB and learn to rush the passer as his career progresses but a guy like Curry can't? Harrison doesn't have alot of pass rush moves either but he had how many sacks the last two years compared to his first years in the league? 8.5 in 2007 and 16 in 2008. Before that he had 4 sacks in 3 years.

PhilFree

You're comparing an undrafted free agent who didn't start until his fourth season in the league to a prospect being considered for the #3 pick overall?

Oh, my.

[Reerun_KC]

Originally Posted by philfree

So at 6' 242 lbs James Harrison can play ROLB and learn to rush the passer as his career progresses but a guy like Curry can't? Harrison doesn't have alot of pass rush moves either but he had how many sacks the last two years compared to his first years in the league? 8.5 in 2007 and 16 in 2008. Before that he had 4 sacks in 3 years.

PhilFree

IF Curry is drafted #3 overall, he better have more impact than UDFA had in his first 3 years...

Maybe we should compare apples to apples and not apples to hazzlenuts...

Curry better ****ing set the defense on fire, lead the team in almost every defensive category for years to come if we are going to waste a Top #3 and reach for him... Other wise, he will be labeled a bust from day one.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by philfree

So at 6' 242 lbs James Harrison can play ROLB and learn to rush the passer as his career progresses but a guy like Curry can't? Harrison doesn't have alot of pass rush moves either but he had how many sacks the last two years compared to his first years in the league? 8.5 in 2007 and 16 in 2008. Before that he had 4 sacks in 3 years.

PhilFree

Well, let's see.

James Harrison is JUST NOW getting his big money deal, AFTER he proved that he could rush the passer.

You're wanting to pay Curry MORE than Harrison will get AFTER HE PROVED IT, before Curry has played a single down.

Sounds like a great plan.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Well, let's see.

James Harrison is JUST NOW getting his big money deal, AFTER he proved that he could rush the passer.

You're wanting to pay Curry MORE than Harrison will get AFTER HE PROVED IT, before Curry has played a single down.

Sounds like a great plan.

Every single rookie is getting paid before they have played a single down.