Chiefs 3-3 after six games. - Page 3

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 09:37 AM

I am going to post this now, because I think there will be a lot of optimism following the Raiders game.

I have watched the Ravens game a few times. The more I watch it, the better I feel about this team.

The Chiefs will win against the Raiders. Not just win, but be in control of the game.

Basically, Oakland's offense is not balanced enough to stretch the Chiefs defense like last week.

Now, that is just one win.... after which we go to Philly, then have the Giants at home, then the Cowboys and then the Redskins.

So, with those quality teams, how can I predict the Chiefs winning two of them.

Okay, well lets look at the Eagles first. The Eagles looked great against Carolina. But, that was after Delhome shat himself. He began to hold the ball longer as the game went along. I don't think the defense is 'that' good.

The Eagles like to bring the blitz alot, but are not huge up front. I think the Chiefs can get the run game going. I don't think McNabb will be back and I think the Eagles will try to work Vick in too much. It will be a detriment to the offense.

Chiefs have a much better shot at that game than if they had McNabb.

Even still, I am predicting this as a loss.

Next up is the Giants at home. As much as I would like to spin this as a win.... I can't. The Giants are a great team. The Chiefs put up a good fight because it is at home, but I can't see them pulling this game out.

So, loss again. So far I am not looking too good.

Luckily.... we have the Cowboys coming in. The Cowboys will be playing their second straight road game. It will be a high scoring game. But the Chiefs will pull it out as the Cowboys look towards their bye week and take the Chiefs lightly.

So, looking a little better at 2-3.

Next up: Washington Redskins. Chiefs catch the Skins in between two conference games. The game before is Carolina. But, more importantly, the game the following week is Philly.

Chiefs won't put up a ton of points, but won't allow many either. Luckily Clinton Portis is on the tail end of his career and NOT playing behing a great Broncos line.

Campbell won't get it done in front of the home crowd and the Chiefs pull out the victory.

.......

Or, the Chiefs could be 0-6..... WTF do I know, I thought Sanchez was Pennington at best and he pulls a freaking Joe Montana in Houston (exageration intended)

**Bearcat** · 09-17-2009, 10:14 AM

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd

I watched the Oakland/San Diego game, the Oakland lines of scrimmage looked like a heck of a challenge for our boys.

We shall see. It will give us a good barometer as to how good San Diego is, or whether they may be a little overated.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog

I agree with the three wins

but I think they'll have three after seventeen games, not six

Wow, so we are going to win the opener next year? Awesome.

**Old Dog** · 09-17-2009, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Wow, so we are going to win the opener next year? Awesome.

Seventeen WEEKS....but the point remains.

Of course if your dumb ass was SENSIBLE you would have already been able to figure that out for yourself.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season.

I don't remember a pass being deflected by the corner and ending up in the hands of our WR.

That's a lucky break.

I saw a lot of guys keep scratching and fighting and finding a way to stand in against a more talented team.

That isn't luck.

The punt block was the right call at the right time.

The interception was a ridiculously great catch from a fully extended player.

Luck isn't losing your starting QB in the preseason. Luck isn't having your best defensive player out.

KCrockaholic · 09-17-2009, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

I guess you dont have the mind of a scout. Or understand the importance of it.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 10:24 AM

Man, you guys take things waaaay too seriously.

Look, I picked out two games that I think the Chiefs have a better chance to win than most think. There are specific reasons I picked those games....but, I won't be 'shocked' if the Chiefs don't win.

But, what fun is it to predict something that everyone else is predicting?

Besides, this board is so negative all the time, the homers merely balance it out a little.

And, predicting 0-16 or even 2-14 isn't 'realistic'..... it is pessimistic. Just like 3-3 is optimistic.

**The Franchise** · 09-17-2009, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Thanks for the update. Sheesh, I had no idea.... wait... I did.

His average rushing per game in Denver was.... drumroll... 106 yards

His average rushing game in Washington has been.... 85 yards.

For those of you who struggle with math, that is 20% more yards per game.

Additionally, his yards per carry average in Denver was 5.5. His yards per carry average in Washington has been..... 4.09 yards per carry. He averaged a yard and a half more per carry in Denver.

Now, who is the dumbass? You have to look a little deeper... but it sounds like that might be hard for you.

Read this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

I think the problem is we havent proven to be able to stop the running game. Skins can control the clock and pound away at 4 yards a carry and pick up first down after first down. Sure, he may not break out a 75 yard run like he did in Denver. But he can still pick up 10 runs of 75 yards and it all adds up the same way.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-17-2009, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

**** Dallas. That team will either soar this season or drop to the bottom of an ocean crevasse. There is NO middle ground with the Cowboys this year.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog

Seventeen WEEKS....but the point remains.

Well, crap.... here I was thinking we were going undefeated next year......lol.

Rooster · 09-17-2009, 10:26 AM

**Bearcat** · 09-17-2009, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

I don't remember a pass being deflected by the corner and ending up in the hands of our WR.

That's a lucky break.

I saw a lot of guys keep scratching and fighting and finding a way to stand in against a more talented team.

That isn't luck.

The punt block was the right call at the right time.

The interception was a ridiculously great catch from a fully extended player.

Luck isn't losing your starting QB in the preseason. Luck isn't having your best defensive player out.

Eh, call it luck or capitalizing off the Ravens' mistakes or whatever... my point was geared much more towards the part about how, if we played like that every week, we won't be tied with 5 minutes to go in the game. I don't care if it was the mighty Ravens last week and the lowly Raiders this week... let's do that again and see how it turns out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

I guess you dont have the mind of a scout. Or understand the importance of it.

Guess that's why I said...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

And, no, I'm not a scout or a coach or a player, so unless I wanted to go back and focus on specific players, why would I want to watch that game again? So I can start overanalyzing and seeing things that weren't there?

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Read this.

Again, he was better in Denver, dumbass.... MUCH better... that was my point.

If you didn't mean to imply otherwise, you should have probably done a better job of not being a dumbass with all your dumbassery.

Don't be a dumbass....dumbass.

Portis with Broncos MUCH better. Know it, learn it, love it.... sleep with it.... make babies with it, grow old with it.... but quit being a dumbass.

Not even sure what all that means..... but I was on a roll.

**The Franchise** · 09-17-2009, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Again, he was better in Denver, dumbass.... MUCH better... that was my point.

If you didn't mean to imply otherwise, you should have probably done a better job of not being a dumbass with all your dumbassery.

Don't be a dumbass....dumbass.

Portis with Broncos MUCH better. Know it, learn it, love it.... sleep with it.... make babies with it, grow old with it.... but quit being a dumbass.

Not even sure what all that means..... but I was on a roll.

Dude.....that was 5 ****ing years ago. It's not like he JUST got traded last year.

Dumbass.

Dumbass.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-17-2009, 10:32 AM

"That thread's got a lot of quit in him".

09-17-2009, 09:37 AM
SenselessChiefsFan MVP Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $10005450	3-3 after six games. I am going to post this now, because I think there will be a lot of optimism following the Raiders game. I have watched the Ravens game a few times. The more I watch it, the better I feel about this team. The Chiefs will win against the Raiders. Not just win, but be in control of the game. Basically, Oakland's offense is not balanced enough to stretch the Chiefs defense like last week. Now, that is just one win.... after which we go to Philly, then have the Giants at home, then the Cowboys and then the Redskins. So, with those quality teams, how can I predict the Chiefs winning two of them. Okay, well lets look at the Eagles first. The Eagles looked great against Carolina. But, that was after Delhome shat himself. He began to hold the ball longer as the game went along. I don't think the defense is 'that' good. The Eagles like to bring the blitz alot, but are not huge up front. I think the Chiefs can get the run game going. I don't think McNabb will be back and I think the Eagles will try to work Vick in too much. It will be a detriment to the offense. Chiefs have a much better shot at that game than if they had McNabb. Even still, I am predicting this as a loss. Next up is the Giants at home. As much as I would like to spin this as a win.... I can't. The Giants are a great team. The Chiefs put up a good fight because it is at home, but I can't see them pulling this game out. So, loss again. So far I am not looking too good. Luckily.... we have the Cowboys coming in. The Cowboys will be playing their second straight road game. It will be a high scoring game. But the Chiefs will pull it out as the Cowboys look towards their bye week and take the Chiefs lightly. So, looking a little better at 2-3. Next up: Washington Redskins. Chiefs catch the Skins in between two conference games. The game before is Carolina. But, more importantly, the game the following week is Philly. Chiefs won't put up a ton of points, but won't allow many either. Luckily Clinton Portis is on the tail end of his career and NOT playing behing a great Broncos line. Campbell won't get it done in front of the home crowd and the Chiefs pull out the victory. ....... Or, the Chiefs could be 0-6..... WTF do I know, I thought Sanchez was Pennington at best and he pulls a freaking Joe Montana in Houston (exageration intended)
Posts: 5,540

09-17-2009, 10:14 AM	#31
Bearcat Would an idiot do that? Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Arizona Casino cash: $-1055069	I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing. Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season.
Posts: 59,606

09-17-2009, 10:24 AM	#37
SenselessChiefsFan MVP Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $10005450	Man, you guys take things waaaay too seriously. Look, I picked out two games that I think the Chiefs have a better chance to win than most think. There are specific reasons I picked those games....but, I won't be 'shocked' if the Chiefs don't win. But, what fun is it to predict something that everyone else is predicting? Besides, this board is so negative all the time, the homers merely balance it out a little. And, predicting 0-16 or even 2-14 isn't 'realistic'..... it is pessimistic. Just like 3-3 is optimistic.
Posts: 5,540

09-17-2009, 10:26 AM	#41
Rooster Draft a QB Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: JoCo Casino cash: $9951689	Yeah.....That's the ticket . Attached Thumbnails __________________ When Reno Hightower was a prick he was the best damn quarterback in the history of Kern County.
Posts: 5,753

09-17-2009, 10:32 AM	#45
Sweet Daddy Hate Unsparing Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	"That thread's got a lot of quit in him". __________________ 1. Merciless, severe. 2. Given freely and generously. 100% refusal to overrate 20 year Head Coaches with ZERO **ing rings as a Head Coach. CP's Official Professor of 'Dem Blues for 2019/2020!**
Posts: 77,135

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode