Chiefs 3-3 after six games.

**Bearcat** · 09-17-2009, 10:14 AM

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season.

I don't remember a pass being deflected by the corner and ending up in the hands of our WR.

That's a lucky break.

I saw a lot of guys keep scratching and fighting and finding a way to stand in against a more talented team.

That isn't luck.

The punt block was the right call at the right time.

The interception was a ridiculously great catch from a fully extended player.

Luck isn't losing your starting QB in the preseason. Luck isn't having your best defensive player out.

KCrockaholic · 09-17-2009, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

I guess you dont have the mind of a scout. Or understand the importance of it.

Rooster · 09-17-2009, 10:26 AM

**Bearcat** · 09-17-2009, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

I don't remember a pass being deflected by the corner and ending up in the hands of our WR.

That's a lucky break.

I saw a lot of guys keep scratching and fighting and finding a way to stand in against a more talented team.

That isn't luck.

The punt block was the right call at the right time.

The interception was a ridiculously great catch from a fully extended player.

Luck isn't losing your starting QB in the preseason. Luck isn't having your best defensive player out.

Eh, call it luck or capitalizing off the Ravens' mistakes or whatever... my point was geared much more towards the part about how, if we played like that every week, we won't be tied with 5 minutes to go in the game. I don't care if it was the mighty Ravens last week and the lowly Raiders this week... let's do that again and see how it turns out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

I guess you dont have the mind of a scout. Or understand the importance of it.

Guess that's why I said...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

And, no, I'm not a scout or a coach or a player, so unless I wanted to go back and focus on specific players, why would I want to watch that game again? So I can start overanalyzing and seeing things that weren't there?

KCrockaholic · 09-17-2009, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Eh, call it luck or capitalizing off the Ravens' mistakes or whatever... my point was geared much more towards the part about how, if we played like that every week, we won't be tied with 5 minutes to go in the game. I don't care if it was the mighty Ravens last week and the lowly Raiders this week... let's do that again and see how it turns out.

Guess that's why I said...

And, no, I'm not a scout or a coach or a player, so unless I wanted to go back and focus on specific players, why would I want to watch that game again? So I can start overanalyzing and seeing things that weren't there?

Thats a fair statement considering your not interested in breaking down a game. Usually people dont just go back to watch a game for "specific" players. Usually its to see what your team did wrong in certain circumstances. And to see what they could do better to improve upon. No, your opinion wont matter to the Chiefs. But its still fun IMO to go back and break it down. I see why someone would want to do this. You just need to have the right mindset to WANT to do it.

**Bearcat** · 09-17-2009, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

Thats a fair statement considering your not interested in breaking down a game. Usually people dont just go back to watch a game for "specific" players. Usually its to see what your team did wrong in certain circumstances. And to see what they could do better to improve upon. No, your opinion wont matter to the Chiefs. But its still fun IMO to go back and break it down. I see why someone would want to do this. You just need to have the right mindset to WANT to do it.

Oh, I totally understand... I love Ron Jaworski and what he brings to ESPN. I wish they would fire all the talking heads like Kornheiser and give Jaws an hour a day on ESPN to break down film. Of course, he obviously has all the camera angles, all the tools, previous film, etc; and has the time to really analyze all of it.

As far as circumstances in Chiefs games though, I do that during the game... watch it a few times, then move on. The thread starter said 'watched the game a few times', and that just sounds odd to me... yeah, you'll see things you didn't see the first time, but I'd just end up FF through most of it.

Guess I'd rather just have someone else do the work for me for every game.

KCrockaholic · 09-17-2009, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Oh, I totally understand... I love Ron Jaworski and what he brings to ESPN. I wish they would fire all the talking heads like Kornheiser and give Jaws an hour a day on ESPN to break down film. Of course, he obviously has all the camera angles, all the tools, previous film, etc; and has the time to really analyze all of it.

As far as circumstances in Chiefs games though, I do that during the game... watch it a few times, then move on. The thread starter said 'watched the game a few times', and that just sounds odd to me... yeah, you'll see things you didn't see the first time, but I'd just end up FF through most of it.

Guess I'd rather just have someone else do the work for me for every game.

Understandable

09-17-2009, 10:14 AM	#1
Bearcat Would an idiot do that? Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Arizona Casino cash: $-1055069	I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing. Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season.
Posts: 59,606

09-17-2009, 10:26 AM	#4
Rooster Draft a QB Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: JoCo Casino cash: $9951689	Yeah.....That's the ticket . Attached Thumbnails __________________ When Reno Hightower was a prick he was the best damn quarterback in the history of Kern County.
Posts: 5,753