Stafford or Sanchez?

[luv]

Originally Posted by milkman

Okay, let's say, for the sake of argument, that Bradford is as good as some seem to think he is.

And for the sake of argument, the Chiefs improve their lines, and get better play all around and finish with 5 or 6 wins and are picking around 8th or 9th overall in next years draft.

How do you suppose they are going to get a shot at Bradford, who will be a top 5 pick if he's as good as some think?

It looks like people are expecting great things from Pioli, yet still think we'll absolutely suck next year while others improve. I don't know what they're on, but I certainly don't want any of it. I think they've fried their brains.

[Mr. Kotter]

Originally Posted by Molitoth

I say go after Bradford in 2010. Use Thigpen in 2009 and draft OL and DL.

Bradford is a bit young right now; too bad....otherwise Sanchez would have some real competition....

[Pablo]

I voted Stafford, but I'm totally cool with either one.

I won't shed a single tear if we have to draft Sanchez.

[dj56dt58]

Aikman and Elway had defenses

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

Aikman and Elway had defenses

And running backs who carried 50% of the offensive load.

[dj56dt58]

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan

And running backs who carried 50% of the offensive load.

right, so I say we build up our front 7 and our offensive line and get a rb that can handle a lot of carries. we already have a good change of pace guy in Charles. Thigpen is fine and can win a SB with a great defense and a great running attack IF he can learn to take snaps under center, which I believe he can

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

Thigpen is fine and can win a SB with a great defense and a great running attack IF he can learn to take snaps under center, which I believe he can

Clayton has the same shot at boinking Carrie Underwood as Thigpen winning a Super Bowl.

[dj56dt58]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Clayton has the same shot at boinking Carrie Underwood as Thigpen winning a Super Bowl.

Trent Dilfer did...he had a great defense. Defense wins championships..thats not just a saying

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

right, so I say we build up our front 7 and our offensive line and get a rb that can handle a lot of carries. we already have a good change of pace guy in Charles. Thigpen is fine and can win a SB with a great defense and a great running attack IF he can learn to take snaps under center, which I believe he can

If I've learned ONE THING from "The Tragedy of Darth LaDanian The Douche", it's that TWO SOLID RB's performing Running Back By Committee is something better established early rather than LATE.

That position is a beater. Hell, look at Terrell Davis. I've advocated and will CONTINUE to advocate the Two-Back Set. Used properly in the "I" formation, and with a QB who's misdirection skills are top-notch( Mark Sanchez, thank you ), it provides extra blocking/hole opening. and enough hesitation on the part of even the best defense to turn a two-yard gain in to 4 or 5.
Let's get Mike Cox involved, and rotate our Tailbacks.

[dj56dt58]

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan

If I've learned ONE THING from "The Tragedy of Darth LaDanian The Douche", it's that TWO SOLID RB's performing Running Back By Committee is something better established early rather than LATE.

That position is a beater. Hell, look at Terrell Davis. I've advocated and will CONTINUE to advocate the Two-Back Set. Used properly in the "I" formation, and with a QB who's misdirection skills are top-notch( Mark Sanchez, thank you ), it provides extra blocking/hole opening. and enough hesitation on the part of even the best defense to turn a two-yard gain in to 4 or 5.
Let's get Mike Cox involved, and rotate our Tailbacks.

not a rbbc, something like the Chargers have with LT and Sproles the Giants have with Jacobs and Ward, the Cowboys have with Barber and Jones, what we originally started with Priest and LJ

[Frankie]

Between the two mentioned I'd take Sanchez. But I still insist neither has shown enough to be worth the 3rd pick of the draft.

[Pablo]

It's great that when I watch either one of these guys highlight videos..I'm saying "holy shit" over and over again at some of the great plays and throws.

I love the way Sanchez looks off safeties and uses the pump to beat coverage...pretty nice shit..

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88

It's great that when I watch either one of these guys highlight videos..I'm saying "holy shit" over and over again at some of the great plays and throws.

I love the way Sanchez looks off safeties and uses the pump to beat coverage...pretty nice shit..

Master of Misdirection. I have to say that I'm thankful to you ****tards for riding my ass and thereby pushing me to look deeper in to these matters. I probably would have missed Mark altogether were it not for my burning hatred of being chumped at The Planet.
Enough of that; let's go to class again!

[Mecca]

Ok first and foremost to clear this up quicky..Sanchez did not injure his knee throwing a pass...he was playing catch with a LB, a tradition at the school and jumped up to catch a pass and came down awkwardly, it turned out to be nothing as he missed no game time..

That is his 1 injury and he's never missed time due to injury now we have people calling him injury prone it just makes 0 sense...

As far as decision making, last year we had people going apeshit that Matt Ryan is a bad decision maker because he threw 17 or 18 INT's, there's a hell of alot more than the INT stat that reflects decision making.

[smittysbar]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ok first and foremost to clear this up quicky..Sanchez did not injure his knee throwing a pass...he was playing catch with a LB, a tradition at the school and jumped up to catch a pass and came down awkwardly, it turned out to be nothing as he missed no game time..

That is his 1 injury and he's never missed time due to injury now we have people calling him injury prone it just makes 0 sense...

As far as decision making, last year we had people going apeshit that Matt Ryan is a bad decision maker because he threw 17 or 18 INT's, there's a hell of alot more than the INT stat that reflects decision making.

My post may have sounded wrong, I think it is absurd to call him injury prone. It shocked me when the guy at the bar said it. I didn't know were he got his info, because he is ussually a well informed, smart, Chiefs fan.

Then I come on here when I gt home and realize 810 was sayin it..........and he was listening to 810 yesterday.