Stafford or Sanchez?

[dj56dt58]

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan

And running backs who carried 50% of the offensive load.

right, so I say we build up our front 7 and our offensive line and get a rb that can handle a lot of carries. we already have a good change of pace guy in Charles. Thigpen is fine and can win a SB with a great defense and a great running attack IF he can learn to take snaps under center, which I believe he can

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

Thigpen is fine and can win a SB with a great defense and a great running attack IF he can learn to take snaps under center, which I believe he can

Clayton has the same shot at boinking Carrie Underwood as Thigpen winning a Super Bowl.

[dj56dt58]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Clayton has the same shot at boinking Carrie Underwood as Thigpen winning a Super Bowl.

Trent Dilfer did...he had a great defense. Defense wins championships..thats not just a saying

[smittysbar]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

Trent Dilfer did...he had a great defense. Defense wins championships..thats not just a saying

He is an exception to the rule, not the rule.

This place is getting weird.......

[Reerun_KC]

Originally Posted by smittysbar

He is an exception to the rule, not the rule.

This place is getting weird.......

Dilfer was a 1st round QB also....

[smittysbar]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Dilfer was a 1st round QB also....

And...........

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

Trent Dilfer did...he had a great defense. Defense wins championships..thats not just a saying

Trent Dilfer was also a top 10 draft pick.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

right, so I say we build up our front 7 and our offensive line and get a rb that can handle a lot of carries. we already have a good change of pace guy in Charles. Thigpen is fine and can win a SB with a great defense and a great running attack IF he can learn to take snaps under center, which I believe he can

If I've learned ONE THING from "The Tragedy of Darth LaDanian The Douche", it's that TWO SOLID RB's performing Running Back By Committee is something better established early rather than LATE.

That position is a beater. Hell, look at Terrell Davis. I've advocated and will CONTINUE to advocate the Two-Back Set. Used properly in the "I" formation, and with a QB who's misdirection skills are top-notch( Mark Sanchez, thank you ), it provides extra blocking/hole opening. and enough hesitation on the part of even the best defense to turn a two-yard gain in to 4 or 5.
Let's get Mike Cox involved, and rotate our Tailbacks.

[dj56dt58]

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan

If I've learned ONE THING from "The Tragedy of Darth LaDanian The Douche", it's that TWO SOLID RB's performing Running Back By Committee is something better established early rather than LATE.

That position is a beater. Hell, look at Terrell Davis. I've advocated and will CONTINUE to advocate the Two-Back Set. Used properly in the "I" formation, and with a QB who's misdirection skills are top-notch( Mark Sanchez, thank you ), it provides extra blocking/hole opening. and enough hesitation on the part of even the best defense to turn a two-yard gain in to 4 or 5.
Let's get Mike Cox involved, and rotate our Tailbacks.

not a rbbc, something like the Chargers have with LT and Sproles the Giants have with Jacobs and Ward, the Cowboys have with Barber and Jones, what we originally started with Priest and LJ

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

not a rbbc, something like the Chargers have with LT and Sproles the Giants have with Jacobs and Ward, the Cowboys have with Barber and Jones, what we originally started with Priest and LJ

That's what I meant. That said, having the Full Back in there makes all the difference.
He has to be able to match or excel initial burst/speed with your Tailback though. When you run a 30-base, he's your lead blocker. Your linemen open the hole, and your Fullback takes out at least one Safety.

But you know this shit, so I'll just shut up now.