Football Peyton Manning - Page 22

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 09:31 AM

So...

Do you guys still think Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning?

Everyone always said that he played with the better supporting cast...which is why Tom was better.

Now Peyton is playing behind a terrible offensive line and throwing to the likes of Austin Collie and Pierre Garcon...having arguably his best year ever...just like I always said...it wasn't the OTHER players...it was Peyton Manning.

So...

Is Brady still better than Manning?

Just curious.

Hootie · 02-08-2010, 02:20 AM

(does that mean I'm taking anything away from Drew Brees and the Saints?)

Nope.

I thought the Cardinals were better than the Steelers last year, and clearly the Patriots were better than the Giants the year before.

It's the NFL...the best team doesn't always win. That's why the Chiefs win a few games every now and then.

**jjchieffan** · 02-08-2010, 02:20 AM

OK. Look at it this way. Take out the INT. Manning still was only able to put up 7 points through 3 quarters of play. Tyler Thigpen could have done that. I dont care about his amazing passes if he couldn't put together enough short, long, amazing or whatever passes to get his team in the endzone. 17 points in the Superbowl is not a spectacular performance. 31 points on the other hand, with a practically non existent running game to take the pressure of Dwight Freeney off of you is spectacular.

rolstrol · 02-08-2010, 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

The only OMG pass I remember was the pass to Clark. My jaw dropped on that one. Other than that, what other passes were there?

I can't recall who he hit on each play...

but the three that really stood out to me was the pass where three or 4 guys were in the area, the pass off his back foot and the pass on the run.

L.A. Chieffan · 02-08-2010, 02:21 AM

using the supporting cast argument is hilarious.

wayne, clark, garcon, collie.

colston, shockey, henderson, meachem et al.

id take the colts

Mecca · 02-08-2010, 02:21 AM

Sean Payton did a solid job after puking on himself in the Vikings game, he learned from that, they deserve credit for having a good gameplan and not being super conservative like Caldwell was.

However I don't see how that entitles a "haha Manning sucks" reaction.

Hootie · 02-08-2010, 02:21 AM

and I'm out.

Can't wait to see Hamas and Milkman come in tomorrow with whatever they want to add...and hopefully we'll see ol' Amnorix chime in again! I almost forgot he existed!

(I'm sure that had nothing to do with Brady suddenly transforming into the 4th or 5th best QB in the game...)

-King- · 02-08-2010, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

All I said was Reggie Wayne picked the Super Bowl to have the worst game I've ever seen him play, that doesn't remotely imply that couldn't possibly win that way, just that he was ****ing awful when he's suppose to be a star.

I don't know how that implies they couldn't possibly win with Wayne sucking or that it somehow compares to Robert Meachem who isn't even a starter.

Saints are regularly in a 3WR package. He is basically a starter.

Titty Meat · 02-08-2010, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

(does that mean I'm taking anything away from Drew Brees and the Saints?)

Nope.

I thought the Cardinals were better than the Steelers last year, and clearly the Patriots were better than the Giants the year before.

It's the NFL...the best team doesn't always win. That's why the Chiefs win a few games every now and then.

lol yea Clancy Pendergast defense was better then Pittsburghs

salame · 02-08-2010, 02:22 AM

Mecca · 02-08-2010, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

OK. Look at it this way. Take out the INT. Manning still was only able to put up 7 points through 3 quarters of play. Tyler Thigpen could have done that. I dont care about his amazing passes if he couldn't put together enough short, long, amazing or whatever passes to get his team in the endzone. 17 points in the Superbowl is not a spectacular performance. 31 points on the other hand, with a practically non existent running game to take the pressure of Dwight Freeney off of you is spectacular.

They scored 24 on offense lets be fair.

Hootie · 02-08-2010, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

OK. Look at it this way. Take out the INT. Manning still was only able to put up 7 points through 3 quarters of play. Tyler Thigpen could have done that. I dont care about his amazing passes if he couldn't put together enough short, long, amazing or whatever passes to get his team in the endzone. 17 points in the Superbowl is not a spectacular performance. 31 points on the other hand, with a practically non existent running game to take the pressure of Dwight Freeney off of you is spectacular.

god damnit

I want to be done with this freaking topic

Peyton Manning basically sat out the 2nd quarter...

and he had 1.5 drives in the 3rd quarter...1 of them resulting in a TD...

the reason the Colts had such a high T.O.P. WAS...like usual...

every one of their drives was super clock consuming...I think they punted once (Garcon drop)...

Peyton Manning's TEAM managed to put up 7 points in 3 quarters...I'll give you taht.

-King- · 02-08-2010, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Sean Payton did a solid job after puking on himself in the Vikings game, he learned from that, they deserve credit for having a good gameplan and not being super conservative like Caldwell was.

Doesn't Manning run his own plays? Wouldn't he be the reason for the Colts offensive gameplan.

Quote:

However I don't see how that entitles a "haha Manning sucks" reaction.

Nobody is saying that. They're saying "haha Manning chokes".

Mecca · 02-08-2010, 02:24 AM

Uh dude even if you think Manning is calling every play, I don't think he wanted to kick a 50 yard FG with a 100 year old kicker.

Hootie · 02-08-2010, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay

lol yea Clancy Pendergast defense was better then Pittsburghs

where did I say that?

Kurt Warner threw a 14 point INT with no time remaining in the 1st half...well...at least a 10 point INT...maybe a 14 point INT...

either way...

I'm entitled to my opinion. I thought the postseason Cardinals were the best team in the NFL last year.

-King- · 02-08-2010, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Uh dude even if you think Manning is calling every play, I don't think he wanted to kick a 50 yard FG with a 100 year old kicker.

Yeah that was a dumb coaching decision.

10-18-2009, 09:31 AM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Peyton Manning So... Do you guys still think Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning? Everyone always said that he played with the better supporting cast...which is why Tom was better. Now Peyton is playing behind a terrible offensive line and throwing to the likes of Austin Collie and Pierre Garcon...having arguably his best year ever...just like I always said...it wasn't the OTHER players...it was Peyton Manning. So... Is Brady still better than Manning? Just curious.
Posts: 56,356

02-08-2010, 02:20 AM	#316
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	(does that mean I'm taking anything away from Drew Brees and the Saints?) Nope. I thought the Cardinals were better than the Steelers last year, and clearly the Patriots were better than the Giants the year before. It's the NFL...the best team doesn't always win. That's why the Chiefs win a few games every now and then.
Posts: 56,356

02-08-2010, 02:20 AM	#317
jjchieffan Supporter Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Highlandville, MO Casino cash: $-147752	OK. Look at it this way. Take out the INT. Manning still was only able to put up 7 points through 3 quarters of play. Tyler Thigpen could have done that. I dont care about his amazing passes if he couldn't put together enough short, long, amazing or whatever passes to get his team in the endzone. 17 points in the Superbowl is not a spectacular performance. 31 points on the other hand, with a practically non existent running game to take the pressure of Dwight Freeney off of you is spectacular. __________________ Genesis 1:1 In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth. Following the historical accounts and the genealogy from that point on, the age of the Earth is approximately 6000-7000 years old. The Big Bullshit Theory is a lie. It and the evolution theory go against real science. Satan has used our public school system to brainwash everyone into believing these lies. Be not decieved.
Posts: 13,353

02-08-2010, 02:21 AM	#319
L.A. Chieffan PLAY GOOD FOOTBALL Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: American Gardens Building Casino cash: $2688654	using the supporting cast argument is hilarious. wayne, clark, garcon, collie. colston, shockey, henderson, meachem et al. id take the colts
Posts: 17,400

02-08-2010, 02:21 AM	#320
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-742950	Sean Payton did a solid job after puking on himself in the Vikings game, he learned from that, they deserve credit for having a good gameplan and not being super conservative like Caldwell was. However I don't see how that entitles a "haha Manning sucks" reaction.
Posts: 115,387

02-08-2010, 02:21 AM	#321
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	and I'm out. Can't wait to see Hamas and Milkman come in tomorrow with whatever they want to add...and hopefully we'll see ol' Amnorix chime in again! I almost forgot he existed! (I'm sure that had nothing to do with Brady suddenly transforming into the 4th or 5th best QB in the game...)
Posts: 56,356

02-08-2010, 02:22 AM	#324
salame Under the Sofa Join Date: Apr 2009 Casino cash: $10010607
Posts: 4,907

02-08-2010, 02:24 AM	#328
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-742950	Uh dude even if you think Manning is calling every play, I don't think he wanted to kick a 50 yard FG with a 100 year old kicker.
Posts: 115,387

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode