Chiefs Peyton sour grapes - Page 9

KC-TBB · 10-07-2013, 06:21 AM

I don't want to just come off sounding like I can't stand to see Peyton with his 12" forehead sitting on the sidelines grinning (although I can't) and it's not because when you watch NFL network or ESPN all they talk about is Broncos...but sometimes I just cant help thinking Bowlen and Elway have naked pictures of NFL officials wives or something.
Is it me or do the donks get 90% of the calls going their way? One play in particular; they horsecollar Romo for a sack...no call...GUARANTEED if that had been Manning, pink flags would have flown. Holding on running plays easily picked up by replay...not called.

I'm not saying they arent a good team, just frustrating we are having the best start in a decade and so are the freaking donks, just don't think they need the 13-14th man on the field helping them. OK so maybe it's just sour grapes after all?

Beef Supreme · 10-07-2013, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo

Has nothing to do with APA format. Just general use of the English language.

Maybe you shouldn't be so quick to judge. Because you're wrong.

Quote:

There is a little confusion on how to use the words use to and used to. One reason for the confusion is that it is sometimes used as a verb, and sometimes used as an adjective. The other reason is because it seems like the tense changes. It's really quite simple when you look at it.

Used as an adjective. Use to be + used to. This means to be accustomed to. For example- I can study with the TV on. I am used to it. It means I am accustomed, adjusted, or don't mind having the TV play while I'm studying.
Or another example- Tim had a hard time living in Tokyo. He wasn't used to so many people. Tim didn't have experience being with big crowds of people before.

Used as a verb. Use to + verb is a regular verb and means something that happened but doesn't happen any more. It uses -ed to show past tense. But since it always means something that happened in the past, it should always use past tense. For example- I used to go to school in Paris. (I went to school there before, but now I don't.) Or, When Joshua was a child, he used to climb trees. (Now he doesn't climb trees.)

Remember, we always use this word when talking about the past. So when do you use use to without the d at the end? When the base form of the verb is used. Look at these examples- She didn't use to swim before noon. (Now she does swim before noon.) Or Did your father use to ride a horse? In these cases the past tense is shown with the did and didn't.

Brock · 10-07-2013, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo

Has nothing to do with APA format. Just general use of the English language.

Nobody gives a shit.

mr. tegu · 10-07-2013, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

You're joking right?

I am genuinely curious. If you don't want to participate why bother responding?

Tombstone RJ · 10-07-2013, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu

I am genuinely curious. If you don't want to participate why bother responding?

I'm seriously interested in how stupid you are?

**ptlyon** · 10-07-2013, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

So please just shut up on the Broncos oline not getting called on holding.

**** off. Don't tell us what we can and can't talk about on this board. If you don't like it, go back to your board.

Now GFY and have yourself a nice day.

mr. tegu · 10-07-2013, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

I don't want to talk about this because any response I can give is questionable at best and will be given with the same amount of confidence my wife gave on our wedding day but I also want to appear like a big man

.

Tombstone RJ · 10-07-2013, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon

**** off. Don't tell us what we can and can't talk about on this board. If you don't like it, go back to your board.

Now GFY and have yourself a nice day.

Tombstone RJ · 10-07-2013, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu

I'm a kc fan so therefore, I am a loser.

.

mr. tegu · 10-07-2013, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

.

Tap out noted.

Tombstone RJ · 10-07-2013, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu

Tap out noted.

you tapped out along time ago... maybe the day you decided to root for kc? Automatic tap out.

Randallflagg · 10-07-2013, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo

Has nothing to do with APA format. Just general use of the English language.

Well then professor, as I said before. You are an idiot. USED to is the proper usage as it is past tense. Next time - get your act together before you attack.

scorpio · 10-07-2013, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo

Anyone who says "used to agree" loses any and all credibility. Learn English and then post. Hint it is use not used...lesson number one.

He's using it the right way. And you look really stupid.

WhawhaWhat · 10-07-2013, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

I'm seriously interested in how stupid you are?

Are you asking yourself a question?

**DaFace** · 10-07-2013, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo

Anyone who says "used to agree" loses any and all credibility. Learn English and then post. Hint it is use not used...lesson number one.

This post is hilarious.

Tombstone RJ · 10-07-2013, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat

Are you asking yourself a question?

nope. I'm just wondering how someone can claim the kc secondary is superior to the Broncos when the Broncos have Bailey, Chris Harris (he has been starting all season since Bailey has been injured and playing great), DRC, Tony Carter and a rooking who's got significant playing time in Kayvon Webster. That's just the CB position.

As for the Broncos safeties, they are not as strong as the Broncos CBs but Duke Ihenacho has been surprisingly great and there is depth with Mike Adams and Bruton. Rahim Moore has been playing well too.

Now, as for kc, I'm sorry but your CBs are not as good or deep as the Broncos, period. I'm not pulling a knowmo here. Flowers, Smith, Cooper and Robinson are not better than the Broncos CBs. Sorry, they aren't. I'll give you an edge at the safety position but not much. Berry, Lewis, Demps and Abdullah are good against the run but not particulary great against the pass IMHO.

but whatever, you all are riding a high right now that is not allowing you to think objectively.

It's like when I got into another one of these arguments with a kc fan on the planet about your TEs. He was claiming that "oh, kc's TEs are soooo much better than the Broncos TEs" and I basically called BS on it.

10-07-2013, 06:21 AM
KC-TBB It is, what it is... Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Harpers Ferry, WV Casino cash: $4505719	Peyton sour grapes I don't want to just come off sounding like I can't stand to see Peyton with his 12" forehead sitting on the sidelines grinning (although I can't) and it's not because when you watch NFL network or ESPN all they talk about is Broncos...but sometimes I just cant help thinking Bowlen and Elway have naked pictures of NFL officials wives or something. Is it me or do the donks get 90% of the calls going their way? One play in particular; they horsecollar Romo for a sack...no call...GUARANTEED if that had been Manning, pink flags would have flown. Holding on running plays easily picked up by replay...not called. I'm not saying they arent a good team, just frustrating we are having the best start in a decade and so are the freaking donks, just don't think they need the 13-14th man on the field helping them. OK so maybe it's just sour grapes after all?
Posts: 1,085