Pats Cheating Comfirmed

[PizzaDoughz]

According to the report, the league sources say the NFL determined 11 of the 12 footballs used by the Patriots were under-inflated by two pounds per square inch each. Per NFL rules, footballs are required to be inflated between 12.5 and 13.5 PSI and weigh between 14 and 15 ounces.

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/1/2...bill-belichick

Discuss.

[PizzaDoughz]

Originally Posted by Katipan

**** Laz, I said that a long time ago.

Im just kidding, Laz.

**** Pawn.

Pawn gave me neg rep for attacking the Pats dude is a huge Cheatriots homer

[Easy 6]

Air pressure aside, I'm leaning towards agreement with the recent Madden simulation... Patriots win 24-28.

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by Katipan

**** Laz, I said that a long time ago.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by Katipan

**** Laz, I said that a long time ago.

Im just kidding, Laz.

**** Pawn.

would

and

would find and worship your gspot

giving you the most massive orgasms



is using a dildo "cheating" ???

dildo gate

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by PizzaDoughz

Pawn gave me neg rep for attacking the Pats dude is a huge Cheatriots homer

yes , I gave you neg rep for making bad comments about the pats

not because you are a ****ing douche nozzle, most likely mult

its because I love tom brady

[PizzaDoughz]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

yes , I gave you neg rep for making bad comments about the pats

not because you are a ****ing douche nozzle, most likely mult

its because I love tom brady

Yeah this site is just so awesome that I feel the need to create multiple accounts . Care to explain how I'm a "****ing douche nozzle?" Me and Hootie argue about Russel Wilson and Peyton Manning all the time and he doesn't act like a little bitch about it

[manchambo]

Originally Posted by Mr. Butthurt

For all the people out there saying this is no big deal, please read this article and then tell me; A. It's no big deal, B. Why it's not, and C. Whether or not you're okay with cheating.

At the outset of this, I didn't think deflation was that much of an advantage.

Based on the statistics, I am astounded at the evil genius of this scheme. A few propositions: (1) Turnover differential is the most important determinant of wins; (2) playoff and seeding races generally come down to a couple of games; (3) home-field advantage is a tremendous advantage in the playoffs. So, we have a team that figured out how to greatly decrease fumbles, which will lead to more wins, which will lead to better playoff seeding.

This minor cheating tweak is responsible for an astounding effect on the Patriots' success.

[Mr. Flopnuts]

Originally Posted by manchambo

At the outset of this, I didn't think deflation was that much of an advantage.

Based on the statistics, I am astounded at the evil genius of this scheme. A few propositions: (1) Turnover differential is the most important determinant of wins; (2) playoff and seeding races generally come down to a couple of games; (3) home-field advantage is a tremendous advantage in the playoffs. So, we have a team that figured out how to greatly decrease fumbles, which will lead to more wins, which will lead to better playoff seeding.

This minor cheating tweak is responsible for an astounding effect on the Patriots' success.

Exactly. Very well started.

[Baby Lee]

Originally Posted by Dayze

you're not just telling us what we want to hear are ya, H.I.?

No

'Cause we just want you to tell the truth


Wellllll, then I guess. . . .

[ClevelandBronco]

Originally Posted by manchambo

At the outset of this, I didn't think deflation was that much of an advantage.



Based on the statistics, I am astounded at the evil genius of this scheme. A few propositions: (1) Turnover differential is the most important determinant of wins; (2) playoff and seeding races generally come down to a couple of games; (3) home-field advantage is a tremendous advantage in the playoffs. So, we have a team that figured out how to greatly decrease fumbles, which will lead to more wins, which will lead to better playoff seeding.



This minor cheating tweak is responsible for an astounding effect on the Patriots' success.

It's ****ing ingenious. I tip my hat to them. Well done.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by GoChargers

And Faulk has since given evidence that the walkthrough thing may have been true after all:



http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-a-super-bowl/

That's EXACTLY what Haley was pissed about after the game against Josh McDaniels Broncos.

Same old pats...oh and look at who is running NEs offense these days...

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by manchambo

At the outset of this, I didn't think deflation was that much of an advantage.

It's really a mental thing with the QBs and about confidence. They all hate shiny new balls. They like them prepared a certain way. If it is different there is a chance mental games kick in.

[manchambo]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

It's really a mental thing with the QBs and about confidence. They all hate shiny new balls. They like them prepared a certain way. If it is different there is a chance mental games kick in.

That has nothing to do with anything I said or any of the evidence that has emerged about the remarkable decrease in fumbles for the Patriots.

[GloryDayz]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

Yeah, between MIT, Harvard, the other universities here (and their many inventions)and the many companies here, we have hardly contributed anything to America at all since we led the way in declaring independence from England and led the fight to end slavery in the lead up to the Civil War.

You forgot a world-class TSA group working at you airport!

Most of those things are from the past and universities don't move, but in the last few decades the place has gone to shit because the people suck balls.

[Katipan]

I was reading Patriots Planet which sent me to Orange Mane which led me to their deflate gate thread, which led me to click to the last post... And because I had to do all that, you get no linky.

Men fight a constant battle with the animal nature inside of us. All of us. Some fight it better than others. But as men it's our responsibility to at least damn well try to fight our darker urges.

It doesn't help that society today urges us to embrace our animal side and pushes the narrative that women are nothing but a warm place to put your pecker and it doesn't help that the narrative coming form's women's groups sounds oddly similar all in the name of "sexual freedom" and "women's empowerment".

Why do you need to empower women in a place they've always had the power? What on earth does empowerment have to do with the bedroom and the ability to be just as much of a cheating dog as men have always been accused of being? Not sure why some women are fighting so hard to become what they claim to loathe. Turn on "Reality TV" and you'll see what I mean.

In my Polly Anna opinion, the world is a better place when a man is strong enough to harness the wild side of his nature to push him to be a strong provider and protector (realizing that strength doesn't always equate with violence) of both his family and his community and a woman embraces the softer side of her nature to be a nurturer (and nurturing doesn't equate with weakness) and voice of wisdom for both her family and community. They realize that there needs to be less "ME" in the world and more "US" and they work together to make their little portion of the world a better place in whatever way they can. We all have it in us.

It's damn hard to harness and even when we can it's not always consistent. But I admire people that at least try.

Don't ever leave ChiefsPlanet, people. It's ****ing scary out there.