Late night bullshit: drafting the Chiefs in the CP Mock.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

It's worth mentioning that virtually all the WRs Dane advocated I select in the first round were still available.

They all should be available in the second. But that doesn't justify taking a center at #18.

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

They all should be available in the second. But that doesn't justify taking a center at #18.

They all should be available, and Erving almost certainly won't be, because he is virtually universally recognized to be the better and/or more valuable player.

And yet you preferred a handful of blatantly inferior WRs in the 1st.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

They all should be available, and Erving almost certainly won't be, because he is virtually universally recognized to be the better and/or more valuable player.

And yet you preferred a handful of blatantly inferior WRs in the 1st.

Blatantly inferior? To whom?

The best center in the world is less valuable than even an average NFL wide receiver and to argue otherwise would further prove that you're talking out of your ass.

Perimeter players are ALWAYS regarded with a higher premium than interior offensive lineman. Hell, the Chiefs just grabbed a two time Pro Bowler for a 5th round pick!

Your philosophy, as always, is flawed.

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Blatantly inferior? To whom?

The best center in the world is less valuable than even an average NFL wide receiver and to argue otherwise would further prove that you're talking out of your ass.

Perimeter players are ALWAYS regarded with a higher premium than interior offensive lineman. Hell, the Chiefs just grabbed a two time Pro Bowler for a 5th round pick!

Your philosophy, as always, is flawed.

The Grubbs trade is largely irrelevant, and it firmly illustrates how you're muddling the waters here:

• Grubbs came with a high cap hit (which the Chiefs smartly fixed).
• Grubbs was being sold in a fire sale.
• Grubbs is 31.
• His play was decidedly NOT Pro Bowl caliber in 2014.
• HE WAS A FIRST ROUND PICK WHEN HE WAS DRAFTED.

Other than that, you're doing great.

If virtually nobody thinks Erving will last as long as ANY of the WRS you were advocating in the 1st, than he is a more valued asset.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

The Grubbs trade is largely irrelevant

A center? Or a WR that can provide 800 yards and 5 TD's?

IMO, that's a no brainer, especially for a team that had zero TD's from it's entire wide receiving corp a year earlier.

You're reaching when there's no reason to reach.