"Alex Smith makes your defense better"

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by ViperVisor

Nonsense.

You can't read. you Alex Smith cock-gobbling psychopath,

That was a later post. It was in response to this post of yours:

Originally Posted by ViperVisor

You have no substantial refute to the core point so classic tactic is attack the messenger.

What you imply is the OL wasn't that bad. That is the joke. Only a dimwit would say that. We watched the games. They were a pile of crap.

Notice, here, that you accuse him of attacking the messenger (you), when he hadn't. You also claim an implication about the offensive line, and toss an insult towards him within that statement.

In other words, dumbass, you started the name calling and personal attacks.

[ViperVisor]

So if someone posts something utterly without value or flat out stupid pat them on the head and say you gave it try, you'll do a good one next time?

You are either a liar or an idiot if you don't admit the O-Line pass blocking really sucked.

Don't do the BS context about 'but Alex Smith X Y Z' It's been hashed out before and those counter-points do not hold up.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by ViperVisor

So if someone posts something utterly without value or flat out stupid pat them on the head and say you gave it try, you'll do a good one next time?

You are either a liar or an idiot if you don't admit the O-Line pass blocking really sucked.

Don't do the BS context about 'but Alex Smith X Y Z' It's been hashed out before and those counter-points do not hold up.

Posting something utterly without value? That's what you did when you posted the numbers without a link or any context.

[ViperVisor]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Posting something utterly without value? That's what you did when you posted the numbers without a link or any context.

Numbers have value. His words are hollow.
You don't like the link or context. Because mostly of a preconceived bias.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by ViperVisor

Numbers have value. His words are hollow.
You don't like the link or context. Because mostly of a preconceived bias.

You didn't publish a link, and you didn't put the numbers in any context, which was Sorter's point in the first place, you idiot.

First rule of holes