Fantasy Football Russel Wilson and Friends agree to deal. - Page 14

Mr_Tomahawk · 07-31-2015, 07:46 AM

Russell Wilson and the Seahawks have agreed to a 4-year, $87.6-million extension, per source.

— Peter King (@SI_PeterKing) July 31, 2015

**SAUTO** · 08-01-2015, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

would be different if it was 5/88 and not 4/88

I was off by a year, I was dead on with money. Unless you think Russell won't be in the NFL in 2020.

It is actually 5-89.5 you weren't even close in guarantees unless 50 MILLION off is close in your mind

Hootie · 08-01-2015, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

There is nobody in the world who would have taken a comment about a new contract to have included the last year of the current deal. Anyone pretending otherwise is flat out lying. The new contract/extension/whatever talk was 100% in reference to additional years and additional money beyond the current contract. He got four additional years. He's getting 88 million additional dollars. That's $22,000,000 per year for four years. Hootie guessed $22,000,000 per year for five years. If anything, that would have been a better deal for Seattle because adding a fifth year to the contract would have been the most expensive year and likely would have made the extension more like 5/$115,000,000.

Quoted for JASONSAUTO, who is a ****ing moron.

Hootie · 08-01-2015, 11:02 AM

for the 19th time ...

AARON RODGERS SIGNED AN EXTENSION ...
ALEX SMITH SIGNED AN EXTENSION ...
TONY ROMO SIGNED AN EXTENSION ...

The only ****ing QB that is a "franchise" QB that didn't sign an extension in the last 5 years is Joe Flacco, and that's because he ****ing sucked, and Baltimore was going to move on from him before his miracle postseason.

ThaVirus · 08-01-2015, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

30 to 50 MILLION is minutiae in your mind? Damn man what's your net worth?

I was referring to the scope of this entire silly debate.

Technically what you, Dane and Cochise are arguing is correct, but you're also playing dumb in an effort to "win" the argument. No one ever discusses contracts with the inclusion of the final year of the old contract. We discuss things purely with new money in mind. And Hootie's prediction, though technically wrong, was actually pretty close, especially if you extrapolate by adding another year, which they could have easily done.

NB4 BUT THEY DIDNT SO HOOTIES RONG!!!11!!!

Hootie · 08-01-2015, 11:04 AM

How in the **** are people even arguing this? I should learn how to be a bigger person, but I'm stubborn. I mean, what the ****.

**Rausch** · 08-01-2015, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

dude, Russell Wilson was NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER, EVER, EVER going to be traded. They could have offered two drafts for the guy and Seattle still would have said no.

It was typical negotiation bullshit by both sides.

You know, the same kind of thing that happened with us and Houston.

Only ... we're talking franchise QB here. Franchise QB's don't get traded. It's not possible. It was never a realistic scenario. Hilariously, we had a conglomerate of folk who wouldn't give up two 1st round picks for the guy. You know, a franchise that hasn't had a franchise QB since Len Dawson.

Smart fan base.

I'd agree and be sure to sign him if it were my team.

People forget that Brady was a game manager his first 3 years. They won 5 playoff games by 7 pts or less.

EVEN LAST YEAR Brady threw for 11ty billion yards in the SB and won by how many pts?...

**SAUTO** · 08-01-2015, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

Quoted for JASONSAUTO, who is a ****ing moron.

Who cares what someone assumes what a five year deal WOULD been?

You were also 50 MILLION off in guaranteed money, which you were sure crowning about earlier.

And his ****ing deal is a 5 year 89.5 million dollar deal. This year isn't even the same as it was going to be money-wise, base or cap hit.

They tore up his old deal and made a new 5 year deal. He was going to make 1.5 million, now it is 700k with a 6.something cap hit.

**Rausch** · 08-01-2015, 11:08 AM

It's a win-win.

Wilson will definitely get his money and Seattle can restructure later on and trade if they have to.

I don't think they will and I think Wilson will continue to evolve into the real deal...

**SAUTO** · 08-01-2015, 11:12 AM

Basically all this means to me is that the Seahawks aren't as sold on Wilson as Hootie seems to think they should be

Hootie · 08-01-2015, 11:18 AM

I'm just going to throw this out there, because I know this is what will happen:

Before the 2018 season, Russell Wilson is going to sign another contract [extension]. It's going to be for 5 years, $130 million with $90 million guaranteed and a $40 million dollar signing bonus. It is going to take on 5 years to his EXISTING deal which is set to expire after 2019.

Russell is going to be a Seahawk for life. He is going to win at least 1 more Super Bowl. And he's going to make a metric shit ton of money. This new deal was a brilliant deal for him because now, no matter what, he has $60M dollars (because they aren't going to cut Russell Wilson any time soon). But more than likely, this deal gives him more leverage to extend his deal even further after 2017.

**notorious** · 08-01-2015, 11:18 AM

Hootie · 08-01-2015, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

They tore up his old deal and made a new 5 year deal. He was going to make 1.5 million, now it is 700k with a 6.something cap hit.

please give me an example of this happening

who's deal was ever "torn" up?

**Rausch** · 08-01-2015, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Basically all this means to me is that the Seahawks aren't as sold on Wilson as Hootie seems to think they should be

They are big money sold for 4 years of hit.

They can tailor that by play if he $3its the bed after 2 or 3 years...

Hootie · 08-01-2015, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Basically all this means to me is that the Seahawks aren't as sold on Wilson as Hootie seems to think they should be

what in the **** are you talking about?

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/92...cording-source

Rodgers signed AN EXTENSION for 5/110/62.5 guaranteed according to that link
Wilson signed AN EXTENSION for 4/88/60 guaranteed according to what I read

I guess the Packers aren't sold on Rodgers.

**BigMeatballDave** · 08-01-2015, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

what in the **** are you talking about?

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/92...cording-source

Rodgers signed AN EXTENSION for 5/110/62.5 guaranteed according to that link
Wilson signed AN EXTENSION for 4/88/60 guaranteed according to what I read

I guess the Packers aren't sold on Rodgers.

Rodgers is 5 years older. Huge difference.

07-31-2015, 07:46 AM
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $-169474	Russel Wilson and Friends agree to deal. Russell Wilson and the Seahawks have agreed to a 4-year, $87.6-million extension, per source. — Peter King (@SI_PeterKing) July 31, 2015
Posts: 18,621

08-01-2015, 11:02 AM	#198
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	for the 19th time ... AARON RODGERS SIGNED AN EXTENSION ... ALEX SMITH SIGNED AN EXTENSION ... TONY ROMO SIGNED AN EXTENSION ... The only **ing QB that is a "franchise" QB that didn't sign an extension in the last 5 years is Joe Flacco, and that's because he **ing sucked, and Baltimore was going to move on from him before his miracle postseason.
Posts: 56,356

08-01-2015, 11:04 AM	#200
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	How in the ** are people even arguing this? I should learn how to be a bigger person, but I'm stubborn. I mean, what the **.
Posts: 56,356

08-01-2015, 11:12 AM	#204
SAUTO Shit Join Date: Jun 2008 Casino cash: $10039067	Basically all this means to me is that the Seahawks aren't as sold on Wilson as Hootie seems to think they should be
Posts: 55,715

08-01-2015, 11:18 AM	#205
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	I'm just going to throw this out there, because I know this is what will happen: Before the 2018 season, Russell Wilson is going to sign another contract [extension]. It's going to be for 5 years, $130 million with $90 million guaranteed and a $40 million dollar signing bonus. It is going to take on 5 years to his EXISTING deal which is set to expire after 2019. Russell is going to be a Seahawk for life. He is going to win at least 1 more Super Bowl. And he's going to make a metric shit ton of money. This new deal was a brilliant deal for him because now, no matter what, he has $60M dollars (because they aren't going to cut Russell Wilson any time soon). But more than likely, this deal gives him more leverage to extend his deal even further after 2017.
Posts: 56,356

08-01-2015, 11:18 AM	#206
notorious Supporter Join Date: May 2005 Location: Who knows? Casino cash: $-1024116
Posts: 88,597