Reid/Dorsey safe for 2016.

[Al Bundy]

#Chiefs chairman Clark Hunt says he will stick with Andy Reid and John Dorsey for 2016, even if they end up with a top 5, top 10 pick.

— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) November 1, 2015

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Do you know this for a fact or is it your conjecture? I'm cynical, but that's pretty out there.

The 2004 Chiefs started pretty terrible and then rattled off a bunch of wins in route to a 7-9 record.

Instead of taking a QB, Vermeil / Carl opted to make a win-now draft pick by getting DJ because the defense was so bad that a rookie could start at MLB.

Yeah, sure, we still have DJ, but they could have had Aaron ****ing Rodgers sitting the bench for at least one season and possibly two. The team drafted for a defensive need because the year prior the team was 7-9 but won more games than they lost to close the year out after the halfway mark. People were scoreboard watching at the end of November hoping enough other outcomes could go KC's way so they could get into the playoffs with an 8-8/9-7 record though they couldn't get the job done in the last two weeks of the season.

The same shit is happening now with people looking at the schedule going "You knowwwwww, the only good team the Chiefs have to play is Denver.. the AFC is pretty shitty this year... 8-8 might actually get you in the playoffs, and the Chiefs can easily go 7-1 to end the year with a 9-7 record..."


Two wins against absolute dumpster fire teams, one win against a one-dimensional team missing the key piece to why that one-dimension to the team is good and five losses -two to actual AFC title contenders and one to an NFC title contender, one loss on the road to a team that is about equal to KC and a HOME loss to a dumpster fire team.

It's almost comical that people are hoping to back into the playoffs by being just slightly less shitty than the rest of a shitty conference if it weren't so ****ing predictable.

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Bridgewater ran for 170 yards.....in his entire college career.

And he had over 200 yds last year for the Vikings....go figure. The one game I recall watching him last year he ran quite a bit. I havent watched him this year.

Originally Posted by O.City

Bridgewater did none of those things. He was a pure pocket passer at Louisville

Great...sorry, didnt catch any of his games at Louisville.

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

The 2004 Chiefs started pretty terrible and then rattled off a bunch of wins in route to a 7-9 record....

Im sorry, I'm not going to bother reading all that. Did you answer my question about whether or not your version of the 'narrative' was your conjecture or not? I tend to think it is.

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by O.city

You aren't going to consistently move the ball against a defense as good as the Broncos, no?

With a QB in his 9th year in the league, an offensive-minded HC who's been to a SB and several conference championship games, a supposedly great WR, a good young TE and a hall of fame running back there should be no excuses.

Not against Denver and not against Green Bay yet here were are.

[Rausch]

Originally Posted by O.city

Well, did we move the ball against the Broncos defense this year?

I'd be curious to see where we stand in line with their other opponents in terms of offensive production.

If you remember one of our scoring drives was kept alive by 3 Denver penalties and one of our TD's came on a defensive TD.

So we scored one TD we weren't gifted on offense, at home, WITH Jamal Charles...

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by O.city

Well, did we move the ball against the Broncos defense this year?

I'd be curious to see where we stand in line with their other opponents in terms of offensive production.

We put up the 2nd most yards against them with 314 total yards. The Vikings actually put up the most with 325.

We had 167 passing yards (5th out of 7 teams). Most was the Lions with 262. The least was 50 from Green Bay.

We had 147 rushing yards.....the most out of the 7 teams they've played. 28 from the Lions was the least.

Gave up the most turnovers out of the 7 teams.....obviously.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

And he had over 200 yds last year for the Vikings....go figure. The one game I recall watching him last year he ran quite a bit. I havent watched him this year.



Great...sorry, didnt catch any of his games at Louisville.

Go figure what?

Yeah....you didn't watch any of his games....but go ahead and continue talking about him like you have.

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Im sorry, I'm not going to bother reading all that. Did you answer my question about whether or not your version of the 'narrative' was your conjecture or not? I tend to think it is.

They're not winning more than nine games. They'll lose at Denver, at Baltimore and at Oakland. 8-8 with a good chance they'll get swept by Oakland and go to 7-9.

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by Rausch

If you remember one of our scoring drives was kept alive by 3 Denver penalties and one of our TD's came on a defensive TD.

So we scored one TD we weren't gifted on offense, at home, WITH Jamal Charles...

Meh...only thing I can remember from that game was that KC lost it moreso than Denver won. Especially after going up 14.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

They're not winning more than nine games. They'll lose at Denver, at Baltimore and at Oakland. 8-8 with a good chance they'll get swept by Oakland and go to 7-9.

I'm going with 6-10.

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Go figure what?

Yeah....you didn't watch any of his games....but go ahead and continue talking about him like you have.

I didnt think I needed your permission, but thanks, Boss.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

With a QB in his 9th year in the league, an offensive-minded HC who's been to a SB and several conference championship games, a supposedly great WR, a good young TE and a hall of fame running back there should be no excuses.

Not against Denver and not against Green Bay yet here were are.

Supposedly great WR? So I'm guessing your on the side that he isn't an improvement over Bowe, but thats a separate argument.

It took 5 turnovers for their to be any semblance of an excuse and a loss that day. Blame that on the coaching staff, players, etc however, but from the eye test, the Chiefs had a conference contender beat at home. Of course, this doens't match your natural tendency here at CP, so spin it however I guess.

Either way, at some point you've got to start winning said games, but the Chiefs haven't so it is what it is.

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

They're not winning more than nine games. They'll lose at Denver, at Baltimore and at Oakland. 8-8 with a good chance they'll get swept by Oakland and go to 7-9.

Ok...I dont have any argument with that. I'm not willing to assign some sort of narrative or motive in that regard. I was curious if you had some sort of inside information in regard to behind the scenes because I dont really believe the 'butts in seats' meme.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

They're not winning more than nine games. They'll lose at Denver, at Baltimore and at Oakland. 8-8 with a good chance they'll get swept by Oakland and go to 7-9.

10 and 6. 5th seed.


Put your tenure here at CP on it.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by O.city

10 and 6. 5th seed.


Put your tenure here at CP on it.

We're beating everyone but the Broncos? Or do you have us beating the Broncos and losing to someone else?